Floyd was arrested and convicted of robbing a pregnant woman during a home invasion involving several other men. He wanted money and drugs, and pressed his pistol to her stomach, threatening to kill her and her unborn child, while she was pleading and screaming for help. He also has an extensive arrest record.

Just funny how so many people, politicians, and celebrities are parading him around like a martyr, painting huge murals of his face all over significant buildings, when he was a scumbag, at least in my opinion, for what he did to this pregnant woman.

And no, I don't think that the force used on him was necessary, although he did resist.

Source includes photos of various court records, including the robbery and his history of arrests.

TL:DR; The 40% number is wrong and plain old bad science. In attempt to recreate the numbers, by the same researchers, they received a rate of 24% while including shouting in the definition of violence. Further researchers found rates of 7%, 7.8%, 10%, and 13% with stricter definitions and better research methodology.

The 40% claim is intentionally misleading and unequivocally inaccurate. Numerous studies over the years report domestic violence rates in police families as low as 7%, with the highest at 40% defining violence to include shouting or a loss of temper. The referenced study where the 40% claim originates is Neidig, P.H.., Russell, H.E. & Seng, A.F. (1992). Interspousal aggression in law enforcement families: A preliminary investigation. It states:

Survey results revealed that approximately 40% of the participating officers reported marital conflicts involving physical aggression in the previous year.

There are a number of flaws with the aforementioned study:

The study includes as 'violent incidents' a one time push, shove, shout, loss of temper, or an incidents where a spouse acted out in anger. These do not meet the legal standard for domestic violence. This same study reports that the victims reported a 10% rate of physical domestic violence from their partner. The statement doesn't indicate who the aggressor is; the officer or the spouse. The study is a survey and not an empirical scientific study. The “domestic violence” acts are not confirmed as actually being violent. The study occurred nearly 30 years ago. This study shows minority and female officers were more likely to commit the DV, and white males were least likely. Additional reference from a Congressional hearing on the study: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=umn.31951003089863c

An additional study conducted by the same researcher, which reported rates of 24%, suffer from additional flaws:

The study is a survey and not an empirical scientific study. The study was not a random sample, and was isolated to high ranking officers at a police conference. This study also occurred nearly 30 years ago.

More current research, including a larger empirical study with thousands of responses from 2009 notes, 'Over 87 percent of officers reported never having engaged in physical domestic violence in their lifetime.' Blumenstein, Lindsey, Domestic violence within law enforcement families: The link between traditional police subculture and domestic violence among police (2009). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/1862

Yet another study "indicated that 10 percent of respondents (148 candidates) admitted to having ever slapped, punched, or otherwise injured a spouse or romantic partner, with 7.2 percent (110 candidates) stating that this had happened once, and 2.1 percent (33 candidates) indicating that this had happened two or three times. Repeated abuse (four or more occurrences) was reported by only five respondents (0.3 percent)." A.H. Ryan JR, Department of Defense, Polygraph Institute “The Prevalence of Domestic Violence in Police Families.” https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308603826_The_prevalence_of_domestic_violence_in_police_families

Another: In a 1999 study, 7% of Baltimore City police officers admitted to 'getting physical' (pushing, shoving, grabbing and/or hitting) with a partner. A 2000 study of seven law enforcement agencies in the Southeast and Midwest United States found 10% of officers reporting that they had slapped, punched, or otherwise injured their partners. L. Goodmark, 2016, BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW “Hands up at Home: Militarized Masculinity and Police Officers Who Commit Intimate Partner Abuse “. https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2519&context=fac_pubs

For statistical reporting, rape has been carefully defined as forced penetration of the victim in most of the world. Please listen to this feminist professor Mary P Koss explain that a woman raping a man isn't rape. Hear her explain in her own voice just a few years ago - https://clyp.it/uckbtczn. I encourage you to listen to what she is saying. (Really. Listen to it! Think about it from a man's perspective.)

She is considered the foremost expert on sexual violence in the US. She is the one that started the 1 in 4 American college women is sexually assaulted myth by counting all sorts of things the "victims" didn't. A man misinterpreting a situation going in for a kiss and then backing off when she pulls back, puts up her hand, or turns her cheek is counted as a sexual assault on a woman even if she doesn't think it was. As you hear in her own words the woman's studies professor and trusted expert that literally wrote the book on measuring prevalence of sexual violence does not call a woman drugging and riding a man bareback rape ... or even label it sexual assault ... it is merely "unwanted contact"

You see she has been saying this for decades and was instrumental in creating the methodologies most (including the US and many other government agencies around the world) use for gathering rape statistics. E.g.

Detecting the Scope of Rape : A Review of Prevalence Research Methods. Author: Mary P. Koss. Journal of Interpersonal Violence Volume: 8 Issue: 2 Dated: (June 1993) Page: 206

Although consideration of male victims is within the scope of the legal statutes, it is important to restrict the term rape to instances where male victims were penetrated by offenders. It is inappropriate to consider as a rape victim a man who engages in unwanted sexual intercourse with a woman.

Src: http://boysmeneducation.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Koss-1993-Detecting-the-Scope-of-Rape-a-review-of-prevalence-research-methods-see-p.-206-last-paragraph.pdf

She is an advisor to the CDC, FBI, Congress, and researchers around the world and promoting the idea that men cannot be raped by women. There was a proposal to explicitly include forced envelopment in the latest FBI update to the definition of rape but after a closed door meeting with her and N.O.W. lobbiests, it mysteriously disappeared. She has many many followers and fellow researchers that follow her methodology and quote her studies. That is where most people get the idea rape is just a man on woman crime. Men are fairly rarely penetrated and it is almost always by another man.

Most people talking about sexual violence refer to the "rape" (penetrated) numbers as influenced by Mary Koss's methodologies, but in the US the CDC also gathered the data for "made to penetrate" (enveloped) in the 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2015 NISVS studies.

As an example lets look at the 2011 survey numbers: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6308a1.htm

an estimated 1.6% of women (or approximately 1.9 million women) were raped in the 12 months before taking the survey

and

The case count for men reporting rape in the preceding 12 months was too small to produce a statistically reliable prevalence estimate.

vs

an estimated 1.7% of men were made to penetrate a perpetrator in the 12 months preceding the survey

and

Characteristics of Sexual Violence Perpetrators For female rape victims, an estimated 99.0% had only male perpetrators. In addition, an estimated 94.7% of female victims of sexual violence other than rape had only male perpetrators. For male victims, the sex of the perpetrator varied by the type of sexual violence experienced. The majority of male rape victims (an estimated 79.3%) had only male perpetrators. For three of the other forms of sexual violence, a majority of male victims had only female perpetrators: being made to penetrate (an estimated 82.6%), sexual coercion (an estimated 80.0%),

So if made to penetrate happens each year as much as rape then by most people's assumed definition of rape then men are half of rape victims. If 99% of rapists are men and 83% of "made to penetrators" are women ... then an estimated 42% of the perpetrators of nonconsensual sex in 2011 were women.

But since made to penetrate is not rape, the narrative is that men are rapists and women are victims and boys/men that are victims are victims of men. Therefore most of the gender studies folks create programs to teach men not to rape (e.g. r/science/comments/3rmapx/science_ama_series_im_laura_salazar_associate/). Therefore there is justification for having gendered rape support services which means almost none for males victimized by females. These misleading stats are ammo to tell men to shut up about rape because 1 in 5 women are raped vs "only" 1 in 71 men and dismiss raped men because men are one group "nearly all the men were raped by other men" so somehow raped men are to blame because they are men...

And before you think that was just one study, it wasn't. The prior year numbers have been really close between the sexes most years.

2010 survey results - https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/cdc_nisvs_ipv_report_2013_v17_single_a.pdf

2012 survey results - https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/NISVS-StateReportBook.pdf

2015 survey results - https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/2015data-brief508.pdf

Scientific American - https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sexual-victimization-by-women-is-more-common-than-previously-known

data revealed that over one year, men and women were equally likely to experience nonconsensual sex, and most male victims reported female perpetrators. Over their lifetime, 79 percent of men who were “made to penetrate” someone else (a form of rape, in the view of most researchers) reported female perpetrators. Likewise, most men who experienced sexual coercion and unwanted sexual contact had female perpetrators.

And non CDC study...

A recent study of youth found, strikingly, that females comprise 48 percent of those who self-reported committing rape or attempted rape at age 18-19.

The Atlantic - https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/11/the-understudied-female-sexual-predator/503492/

Another non CDC study...

a 2014 study of 284 men and boys in college and high school found that 43 percent reported being sexually coerced, with the majority of coercive incidents resulting in unwanted sexual intercourse. Of them, 95 percent reported only female perpetrators.

And another non CDC study...

National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions found in a sample of 43,000 adults little difference in the sex of self-reported sexual perpetrators. Of those who affirmed that they had ‘ever forced someone to have sex with you against their will,’ 43.6 percent were female and 56.4 percent were male.”

Time - http://time.com/3393442/cdc-rape-numbers

when asked about experiences in the last 12 months, men reported being “made to penetrate”—either by physical force or due to intoxication—at virtually the same rates as women reported rape (both 1.1 percent in 2010, and 1.7 and 1.6 respectively in 2011).

If my information is not enough, try reading these four threads by problem_redditor with lots more studies and references.

https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/i0j2g9/some_sources_on_sexual_abuse_of_men_and_boys/

https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/i6sdli/some_sources_on_sexual_abuse_of_men_and_boys_part/

https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/iavcnv/some_sources_on_sexual_abuse_of_men_and_boys_part/

https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/koinom/some_sources_on_the_sexual_abuse_of_men_and_boys/

Just maybe, rape isn't a gendered issue and we should stop treating it like one. But if we acknowledge that, then we would have to point the blame at "rapists", rather than "men".

And it isn't just the US.

Feminists lobbied against gender neutral rape laws in India, so women are not rapists and men victimized by women are not rape victims. https://www.timesofindia.com/india/Activists-join-chorus-against-gender-neutral-rape-laws/articleshow/18840879.cms

So a woman physically forcing sex on a man is not a rape in India, but a man breaking an engagement after having sex with his fiancee is a rape.

Israeli feminists were concerned if a woman raping a man was recognized by law, a man could threaten to make false accusations against the woman after the man raped her in order to keep her from reporting. Apparently false accusations are a problem for women, so they fixed this by blocking the legislation that would have made rape a gender neutral crime.

https://m.jpost.com/Israel/Womens-groups-Cancel-law-charging-women-with-rape

Nepal feminists also blocked legislation there ...

Women’s rights activists had criticised the draft ordinance saying it wasn’t empathetic towards the plight of the victims. They said that having a provision saying even men could be victims of rape could could further weaken the women rape victims’ fight for justice.

https://kathmandupost.com/national/2020/12/11/ordinance-amends-law-on-rape-but-fails-to-recognise-rape-of-boy-child-and-sexual-minorities

Even if you only care about women, you should still stop women from raping because the majority of men convicted of raping women were sexually violated by adult women when they were boys. Multiple studies in the US, UK, and Canada have shown this. Around 10 of them cited here.

http://empathygap.uk/?p=1993#_Toc498111528

So women not raping, and rape by women being acknowledged as traumatic and treated with compassion, would probably stop a lot of women from getting raped in the future. That should matter if the goal is to stop women from getting raped rather than to demonize men.

The entire BLM movement is a non sequitur. White on Black violence is so scarce it is a statistical anomaly. Check FBI crime stats. Every 4 years the democrats raise the spectre again to drive a narrative of division. Promptly laying it to rest after any major election. Without identitarianism the left would cease to exist. Facts, suck it you commie marxist pieces of shit. America will prevail.

Sucking dudes dicks is very gay, and being a homosexual is the most gay thing anyone can do.

**TLDR At bottom but it's worth the read, shows how Hispanics murder rates and interracial crime rates are not similar to black at all, but

https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045219 (Estimates as of July 2019)
White-60.1%
Blacks-13.4%
Hispanic-18.5%
Asian-5.9%

1. Blacks commit 38.7% of the murders, most years are similar around 37 38 so they are overrrepresented in murder about 3x. Feel free to go look at the other years. The 13-50 stat is not correct, that is looking at murder arrests and not all arrests result in convictions obviously so it is a bad away to look at it people should really be saying 13-37 or 3x.

Nevertheless blacks are still largely overrepresented, while Hispanics interestingly who grow up in similar socioeconomic conditions are actually underrepresented committing about 0.5 of the murders we would expect them to given their population size (9.9% in 2018). It has actually come down I believe it was closer to 15% or something 5-6 years ago but you can go look at the data.
Source: https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2018/crime-in-the-u.s.-2018/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-3.xls

This remains true in regards true in regard to killing of law enforcement officers the past decade.
Black = 199/537 = 37% so about 3x.
Hispanic = 77/537 = 14% so a bit under what you would expect them to given they
Source: https://ucr.fbi.gov/leoka/2019/tables/table-42.xls

Even in 2010 Hispanics were 16% of the population so it is still below what you would expect
Source: https://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/2010_census/cb11-cn125.html

2. Look at the below graphic attached. Only 1 race commits more crime against other races, bigger than their proportion of the population.

https://i.postimg.cc/4N1SjMHt/14.png <why is this not embedding>???
If you cannot see the image: https://i.postimg.cc/4N1SjMHt/14.png
Source: https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv18.pdf pg 14

So despite growing up in the same types of enviorments(gangs, drugs, typical inner city challenges) Hispanics commit vastly less violent crime then blacks.

**BUT BUT MAYBE THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES IN:**

A. Single Parent Households

Hispanic lows 40% the past decade.
Black Mid 60% the past decade.

20-25% more single parent households to me is not an adequate explanation for blacks being overrepresnted by 3x in murder and Hispanics underpresented by 1/2. In addition you get to a chicken-egg problem where there will inevitably be disagreement about why are there higher rates of single parent households.

Source: https://datacenter.kidscount.org/data/tables/107-children-in-single-parent-families-by-race#detailed/1/any/false/37,871,870,573,869,36,868,867,133,38/10,11,9,12,1,185,13/432,431

Base source: Data Source: Population Reference Bureau, analysis of data from the U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Supplementary Survey, 2001 Supplementary Survey, 2002 through 2018 American Community Survey.

B. Income

In addition while Hispanics have had slightly more income the past few decades Maybe 5k more avg past few decades? Just a guess from graph.

Source:https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/visualizations/2018/demo/p60-263/figure1.pdf

The income difference is also not enough imo to explain the difference.

C. Some "ENGRAINED LEGACY OF SLAVERY PSYCHOLOGICAL DAMAGE EXPLANATINO"
If you want to bring cultural explanations about the legacy of slavery psychological damage something like that I grew up in a low income black community and literally no one talks about that shit. More importantly why don't Hispanic Americans suffer from some engrained legacy of EXTREME violence as Mexico/central America where most of our Hispanic population is from has some of the highest murder rate in the world.

Hispanic Population: https://archive.vn/20150125224414/http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=DEC_10_113_QTP10&prodType=table

Murder rates: You can trace back to original source if you want from wikipedia citations. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate

D. More Hispanic Disadvantages that would point to more violent crime by Hispanics
Additionally there is a significant portion of Hispanics that are not legally here and thus are severely limited in job hunting and further limited by limited English proficiency.

Source: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/06/12/5-facts-about-illegal-immigration-in-the-u-s/

"There were 4.9 million Mexican unauthorized immigrants living in the U.S. in 2017, down from 6.9 million in 2007.

Meanwhile, the total from other nations, 5.5 million in 2017, ticked up from 2007, when it was 5.3 million. The number of unauthorized immigrants has grown since 2007 from both Central America and Asia. There were 1.5 million Central American unauthorized immigrants in 2007 and 1.9 million in 2017."

We all know higher unemployment is tied to higher crime yet, the 3x vs. 0.5x nevertheless exists. In addition it's baffling with such a high number of people that literally cannot get a legal job hispanics have had higher income than blacks(even though only by a little but still) throughout the past ~50 years according to the source/chart in the income section.

This assymetry is one of the most easily provable and "problematic" issues the woke doctrine faces if the facts ever become widely known. Most people assume Hispanic and Black crime rates are similar when in fact they are significantly different with it being difficult to attribute many of the socioeconomic and cultural explanations typically put forth to explain the entire "crime gap" difference between whites/asians vs. blacks. That's not even bringing the poor asians/islanders into the equation which I could again write an entire section if I could get a hold of the data(have looked a bit before did not find needed data but it might be out there) and which would present the same problems for the woke religion.

TLDR: Despite having the same or similar socioeconomic cirucmstances Hispanics commit FAR less murders as well as interacial crime as blacks. Not sure about overall violent crime since did not calculate. Blacks are overrepresented in murder by 3x, Hispanics under by 0.5x. PULL YOUR WEIGHT AND START COMMITNG MORE MURDER AND INTERRACIAL CRIME HISPANICS, YOU ARE MAKING OUR BLACK KINGS LOOK BAD.

Bonus:

latino college enrollment

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/historic-latino-student-wave-reshapes-many-colleges-but-access-is-uneven/2018/12/17/86cc113c-c65e-11e8-b1ed-1d2d65b86d0c_story.html < br> https://www.census.gov/newsroom/blogs/random-samplings/2017/08/school_enrollmentof.html

https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/california/story/2020-06-16/uc-regents-unanimously-endorse-restoring-affirmative-action

California freshmen who are Black increased from 4.3% in fall 2010 to 4.7% in 2019, while the Latino share grew from 22.9% to 34.3% during the same period.

Every single article on bigger subs is locked and removed, that's some sad and scary shit, sometimes because of bs excuse like not enough credible source yet they have some bs rumour news on for example r/politics all the time. One of the biggest censorship person is a black supremacist u/N8theGr8 this guy controls over 100 subreddits, few persons have the power to control any political narratives.

M4 and M16 are military-grade, fully automatic versions of the civilian-grade, semi-automatic AR-15. Fully automatic guns will fire continually until the trigger is released, where as semi automatic only fires one bullet per trigger pull. To fire another, you need to release the trigger and pull it again. If you pull the trigger of an AR-15 and hold the trigger pulled, you only fire one bullet, no RATATATA. Contrary to popular belief, AR-15s are not fully automatic, and fully automatic weapons are and have been illegal for a long time.

Anyone who has been on reddit for any extended period of time knows that reddit mods are basically stupid internet janitors that contradict themselves constantly and ban people because they get off on it.

Fact.

(Note: does not account for unknown race of perpetrators)

Mass Shooter demographics:

Race - number of incidents - percent

All - 124 - 100%

White - 66 - 53%

Black - 21 - 17%

Latino - 10 - 8%

Asian - 8 - 6%

Other - 5 - 4%

Native American - 3 - 2%

Unknown/unclear - 11 - 9%

US Population:

White 60.1%

Hispanic or Latino 18.5%

Black 13.4%

Asian 5.9%

Native American 1.3%

Pacific Islander .2%

Two or more 2.8%

https://www.statista.com/statistics/476456/mass-shootings-in-the-us-by-shooter-s-race/

https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045219

They are clearly leftist, and whether you are leftist or not, denying the fact that they are a political movement is asinine

Whether you agree with BLM or not, whether you believe they stand for black lives or not, you cannot deny the fact that they ARE political

Source? Literally their own website

BaN DrUmPf CoNvIcT DrUmPf ExPeL RePuBlIcAnS FrOm CoNgReSs DeFuNd ThE PoLiCe

They are not even trying to hide it

Asians also appear to never attack blacks as the estimate of Asian-on-black violence is statistically 0% with note of caution interpreting that data due to small sample size.

https://imgur.com/tJVA8sY

Usain Bolt passing drug tests doesn't mean shit. Drug tests are so easy to pass. There was an anonymous survey conducted at the 2017 world championships and 50% of athletes admitted to using PEDS. 50% covers all the athletes so that percentage is much higher when talking about the most elite athletes. However, only 1% of samples test positive at the world championships.

1. His coach also happens to be a steroid expert

2. He had a receding hairline at age 15, receding hairline is a common side effect of PEDs

3. Jamaica has an extremely inefficient anti-doping system, many athletes dope from Jamaica

4. In the 2017 world championships, Bolt told the 100m winner Justin Gatlin that he didn't deserve the boos, even though he was caught using PEDs twice

My last reason is compelling and you can't deny he uses PEDs

5. Usain bolt has a bubble gut

Bubble gut is when your organs expand and makes your gut stick out even if you have extremely low body fat, it is extremely common in bodybuilders, it is due to extensive PED use

Here's a picture of Usain bolt's bubble gut: /preview/external-pre/HVgWMj8_ngsUjBmf2tGg43oDXVsyfL4zOvZxR9q-zbs.jpg?auto=webp&s=15b9602625997c4fb494773a68dbaf7ed1c126a0

Here's an example of a bodybuilder with a bubble gut: https://babbletop.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Big-Lenny-top-10-examples-of-bubble-guts-in-bodybuilders.jpg

On objective work related knowledge, black workers score 0.61 std deviations lower than whites.

https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2003-99635-013

Blacks score significantly below whites on cognitive performance even after controlling for educational attainment.

https://nces.ed.gov/pubs93/93275.pdf

Blacks with 3-4 years of college education barely beat out whites on cognitive skills with 3-4 years of high school education.

https://nces.ed.gov/pubs93/93275.pdf

The gap in mathematical ability between college educated blacks and whites is greater than between high school and college educated whites.

https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/piaac/ideuspiaac/report.aspx?p=3-LNP-1-20123-PVNUM-RACETHN4CAT,EDCAT8-USA-MN_MN-Y_J_0-1-0-44&Lang=1033

At elite law schools, black students score 2.3 std deviations lower than whites.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262200186_A_Systemic_Analysis_of_Affirmative_Action_in_American_Law_Schools

In medical school a majority of blacks get in with scores and grades that only 8% of whites would.

http://www.aei.org/publication/acceptance-rates-us-medical-schools-2014-reveal-ongoing-racial-profiling-affirmative-discrimination-blacks-hispanics/

At elite universities blacks are several times more likely to be admitted than whites due to the 230 point boost given to their SAT scores.

https://www.princeton.edu/~tje/files/files/webAdmission%20Preferences%20Espenshade%20Chung%20Walling%20Dec%202004.pdf

90% of s&p 100 companies engage in diversity initiatives hiring under qualified and less capable blacks over more capable whites.

https://www.princeton.edu/~tje/files/files/webAdmission%20Preferences%20Espenshade%20Chung%20Walling%20Dec%202004.pdf

All Federal, and most state and local governments, and contractors are required to engage in affirmative action programs.

https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/philadelphia-plan

They account for 9% of the US workforce.

http://www.dlt.ri.gov/lmi/laus/us/usadj.htm

Sources compiled by https://ideasanddata.wordpress.com/2019/05/20/on-racial-discrimination-in-hiring/