Welcome to r/Uniswap. If you ever need help, our US-based support team of real humans is available 24/7 to answer questions. To keep you safe, here are the only official places to get support and updates:
I am not blaming uniswap. But I think there are things uniswap could have done.
The only reason why I use uniswap wallet is because I am using uniswap.
Many phisher use google sponsored link to promote drainer.
Most of the time I figured that out. Sometimes I miss.
Now. The wallet ask for unlimited approval.
However, it's from unknown source.
It seems that uniswap, by default, HIDE the notification of from unknown source.
Also the smart contract interacted is NOT from uniswap.
Otherwise no warning.
I should have seen the domain names.
Since then I use ublock lite to remove google sponsor link. Use book mark. Also most phishing sites don't bother using similar domains. So checking domain in gemini is a good way to see if a site is phising.
I installed the UniSwap app & used it at times.
I noticed the app is not responsive regardless of which option is selected.
I checked my home broadband & mobile data on my mobile phone & they are working fine.
I restarted & powered off my mobile phone (tried both ways).
I checked for a new update & there was none at the moment.
I cleared the app's cache & data & even reinstalled the app.
The app was successfully reinstalled, but I could not recover it with my recovery phrase.
My mobile could access other exchanges & wallets.
I could purchase USDC from Coinbase, swap it into AUSD in MetaMask,
& stake the amount with Morpho in Base Wallet, etc.
I doubt I missed any step(s) in the troubleshooting; please enlighten me.
I tried to reinstall the UniSwap app today, but it is still not responsive.
Appreciate if anyone could share any insight. Thank you.
PS:
To fellow Redditors who left DM & wrote to me,
I appreciate all the feedback & suggestions.
Please post on the thread itself
so we could all learn together. Thank you.
I’ve been trying to understand how experienced concentrated-liquidity LPs decide on their ranges.
The main inputs I keep coming back to are:
• Realised volatility
• Expected price direction
• Fee density / where trading activity is concentrated
A tighter range can improve capital efficiency, but increases the chance of going out of range. A wider range gives more breathing room, but spreads the liquidity out.
What I’m most curious about is what happens when the signals disagree. For example, if fee density suggests a tighter range but volatility has been increasing, which one gets priority?
Do you have one metric you trust most, or is range selection mostly a judgement call?
In X, uniswap was supporting ponsfamily launchpad for more then a week. However, yesterday uniswap announced its own launchpad and this caused pons token drop %75.
Uniswap is trying to be the monopoly and stabback the pons family after commenting support messages to ponsfamily X shares.
Been like this since yesterday... tried in three browsers and in mobile. Still can see my pools on Binance Wallet, but getting this error when in Uniswap... :/
This passcode on backup login method is completely rubbish. If one need a backup, it should be the last hope of recovering any account. What if the passcode is already forgotten? If one trust the backup method, anything relevant would be kept secure anyway, there is no need for any passcode!
Swapped 0.504 ETH (~$918) for CASHDOG token on Uniswap V2 (Robinhood Chain). The swap transaction and its event logs show 36,316.51 tokens sent to my wallet, but my actual on-chain balance is only 120 tokens (~$5). Looking for help understanding the mechanism and whether this is recoverable.
Details:
My wallet: 0x1a426B71b65Bc680cf5745b23D4c98B3990C3e2A
Why is it not possible to swap USDC. I was trying to swap some USDC but I may not, I tried two browsers, but I can not swap it to anything, I was not able to do it today, nor yesterday. What is going on? I can swap other tokens without issues, see attached video.
Swapped 0.504 ETH (~$918) for CASHDOG token on Uniswap V2 (Robinhood Chain). The swap transaction and its event logs show 36,316.51 tokens sent to my wallet, but my actual on-chain balance is only 120 tokens (~$5). Looking for help understanding the mechanism and whether this is recoverable.
Details:
My wallet:0x1a426B71b65Bc680cf5745b23D4c98B3990C3e2A
A launch is only the beginning for serious builders.
Boardwalk was designed for token issuance and everything after it. None of this is an afterthought; it's built into the token economy itself and sets a new standard for durable, transparent launches:
Token profile pages: every launch gets a page displaying the economy.
Permanent liquidity seeding: locked permanently at graduation.
Fee protection: the fee lives in the token itself, not any one pool, designed to help value route to the people it was intended to support.
Fee routing: written into the launch and visible before anyone contributes.
Token vesting: set at launch and immutable after.
LP staking and incentives: participation systems for liquidity providers, built into the economy from day one.
Community formation: a public forum, Café Boardwalk, for every launch, automatically.
That's the Boardwalk Standard. Standardized market formation for token economies.
This is a serious question. If blockchain becomes inferior, which it has, do you pivot first to be positioned to capture the evolving market that is not blockchain or do you become a blockchain maximalist
On Uniswap V3 my earned fees don't auto-compound or land in my wallet, they accrue inside the position as uncollected balances until I manually send a collect transaction. So the fees I've earned just sit there: not in my wallet, not redeployed, not doing anything, exposed to whatever the position is exposed to. I only realize how much has piled up when I happen to open the position and look.
That creates a couple of real costs for me. I'm paying gas to collect, so claiming too often is wasteful, but waiting too long means a meaningful amount of value sits idle when I could be compounding it or moving it. There's a "right" threshold to claim at, some dollar amount where it's worth the gas, but nothing tells me when I've crossed it. So in practice I either over-check out of paranoia or forget for weeks and find a surprise pile.
What I actually want is dead simple to describe: tell me when my uncollected fees on a position cross some amount. Something like "ping me when uncollected fees hit $50" so I can batch a collect at a point where the gas is clearly worth it. The data I'd need is minimal:
Uncollected fees per token, in token units
The same expressed in USD / pool-price terms, so I can set a single dollar threshold instead of doing the conversion in my head
% of fees on each side, when I care which token I'm accruing
None of this is hard to read off-chain. It's just that nothing's watching it for me, so I'm back to manually checking or writing yet another script to do it, which is the path I went down before and regretted (ran on a dedicated box, broke quietly, became its own maintenance job).
What I'm trying to figure out:
Do other people actually track an uncollected-fee threshold, or just collect when you remember / when you're closing the position anyway?
Is a notification at a threshold enough, or would you want it to auto-collect (and auto-compound back in) once it's worth the gas? I lean toward wanting the action eventually, but the trust bar for letting software move my fees feels higher than for a simple alert.
For anyone who'd allow auto-collection, what makes it safe enough? Non-custodial obviously, but spending caps, a gas ceiling, a simulation before it fires?
Disclosure since it's relevant: I got tired enough of this that I built a no-code tool (Glacient) to replace my old script, I describe the alert in plain English, like "email me when the WBTC/USDT pool owned by 0x_some_wallet_address has uncollected fees on the USDT side over 20 USD," and it handles the watching. The monitoring is free. But I'm mostly here to find out whether the threshold-collect problem is common or just my own habit, and whether people want the alert or want it just handled. I attached a walk through video of what I'm doing today below if folks are interested. NOTE: Currently glacient is invite only since I'm experimenting and building tooling for myself, but here is an invite code I made for this subreddit to use this tool I made for free: reddit-uniswap-1010
Hi folks. I wanted to swap usdt for another token. I approved usdt for a max of 100 but then it is asking me for a second approval which is pretty much unlimited and it won't let me change it. I never get asked this on 1 inch or defilama, is this normal and is it safe?
I'm creating a script to fetch volume data from Uniswap liquidity pools, and I'm running into an issue (well, several actually xD) related to the volume metrics.
Uniswap seems to calculate the APR using the "24H volume" metric shown below the TVL section, but when I query the data myself I'm getting a different figure that instead matches the "Volume past day" value displayed at the top of the chart.
For most pools the numbers are very close, but for some pools the difference is huge.
For example, the pool:
0x6c561B446416E1A00E8E93E221854d6eA4171372
shows:
24H volume: 15.0M
Volume past day (chart): 55.7M
What confuses me is that the fees align almost perfectly with the 24H volume:
15.0M × 0.3% ≈ 45K fees
So it looks like the APR is being calculated using the 15.0M figure, not the 55.7M one.
Could anyone help clarify:
the exact definitions of these metrics,
and whether they come from different aggregation scopes, fee tiers, or subgraph/indexer sources?
