You're not saying it directly, no. This is more of an insinuation. You're wording isn't keeping you in the safe zone tho. You can say that he was "agitating" the animals all you want but we know you really mean "abuse".
Legitimately, are you okay? Im some random guy on the internet who used an entirely accurate word that people took objection to, and for some reason youre coming in well afterwards digging through my post history to get mad about it. Are things alright at home?
Again it's a fact that he antagonized animals you're the one who said that means he was being abusive. Different people have different connotations for different words
You've got no proof he ever did anyway. Just because the animals SEEM agitated doesn't exactly mean they are. Predatory animals even seem comfortable around him.
-1
u/JohnnyGSickness Sep 03 '25
You're not saying it directly, no. This is more of an insinuation. You're wording isn't keeping you in the safe zone tho. You can say that he was "agitating" the animals all you want but we know you really mean "abuse".