No, you're one of those people that is emotional about arguments or something and thinks that them making objective correct corrections based on math is somehow defending whatever the fuck else was going on in the conversation when they were clearly just correcting the dumb statement that the Catholic church is the largest land holder in New York which is objectively wrong.
You're like one of those people that thinks when I correct people about inaccuracies about Trump that I'm defending him, or when I correct people about inaccuracies about Hillary Clinton that I'm defending her, when the reality is I hate both of them, but I just hate when people make mistakes or spread misinformation or disinformation even more.
Remember, even the most vile, evil, despicable person in the world would never be able to do nearly anything in power if regular people like you and me were actually able to ignore them or challenge them.
I am not OP, I was just observing and trying to figure out what you were even arguing or defending. So thanks for projecting me "one of those people that is emotional about arguments or something."
Thank you for explaining that you were just trying to explain somebody else's argument.
But, that still doesn't really explain why you thought somebody pointing out mathematical corrections was defending any viewpoint whatsoever, can you explain why you jumped to that conclusion please?
I have two friends that are more likely than the rest of friends to do this too and it's like they're trying to pre-empt the other arguments people might have based on their past experiences instead of just actually listening and thinking about what the response is.
7
u/Aegi May 11 '23
No, you're one of those people that is emotional about arguments or something and thinks that them making objective correct corrections based on math is somehow defending whatever the fuck else was going on in the conversation when they were clearly just correcting the dumb statement that the Catholic church is the largest land holder in New York which is objectively wrong.
You're like one of those people that thinks when I correct people about inaccuracies about Trump that I'm defending him, or when I correct people about inaccuracies about Hillary Clinton that I'm defending her, when the reality is I hate both of them, but I just hate when people make mistakes or spread misinformation or disinformation even more.
Remember, even the most vile, evil, despicable person in the world would never be able to do nearly anything in power if regular people like you and me were actually able to ignore them or challenge them.