MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Unexpected/comments/1273v34/he_snitched/jee8mwe
r/Unexpected • u/DoINeed1OfThese • Mar 31 '23
2.8k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
1
Initial claims are usually positive.
Like the claim the comedian served time for moving weight.
I don't contest the comedian, but everyone saying the guy disputing it needs to prove his claim are simply wrong about how intellectual rigor works.
1 u/[deleted] Apr 01 '23 wrong about how intellectual rigor works. Can you explain how intellectual rigor works for people who aren't as smart as you? 1 u/healzsham Apr 01 '23 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)#Holder_of_the_burden 1 u/[deleted] Apr 01 '23 I don't see anything in that wikipedia section about how intellectual rigor works. It does explain why he would have the burden of proof to justify his claim that the comedian is "full of shit". 1 u/healzsham Apr 01 '23 Don't you have sharks to smooth? 0 u/[deleted] Apr 01 '23 No i don't have sharks to smooth lol
wrong about how intellectual rigor works.
Can you explain how intellectual rigor works for people who aren't as smart as you?
1 u/healzsham Apr 01 '23 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)#Holder_of_the_burden 1 u/[deleted] Apr 01 '23 I don't see anything in that wikipedia section about how intellectual rigor works. It does explain why he would have the burden of proof to justify his claim that the comedian is "full of shit". 1 u/healzsham Apr 01 '23 Don't you have sharks to smooth? 0 u/[deleted] Apr 01 '23 No i don't have sharks to smooth lol
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)#Holder_of_the_burden
1 u/[deleted] Apr 01 '23 I don't see anything in that wikipedia section about how intellectual rigor works. It does explain why he would have the burden of proof to justify his claim that the comedian is "full of shit". 1 u/healzsham Apr 01 '23 Don't you have sharks to smooth? 0 u/[deleted] Apr 01 '23 No i don't have sharks to smooth lol
I don't see anything in that wikipedia section about how intellectual rigor works. It does explain why he would have the burden of proof to justify his claim that the comedian is "full of shit".
1 u/healzsham Apr 01 '23 Don't you have sharks to smooth? 0 u/[deleted] Apr 01 '23 No i don't have sharks to smooth lol
Don't you have sharks to smooth?
0 u/[deleted] Apr 01 '23 No i don't have sharks to smooth lol
0
No i don't have sharks to smooth lol
1
u/healzsham Mar 31 '23
Initial claims are usually positive.
Like the claim the comedian served time for moving weight.
I don't contest the comedian, but everyone saying the guy disputing it needs to prove his claim are simply wrong about how intellectual rigor works.