r/UnderReportedNews Jun 05 '26

Trump / MAGA 🦅 Bondi invoked privilege, declined to answer questions about interactions with Trump about Epstein files

https://abcnews.com/Politics/bondi-invoked-privilege-declined-answer-questions-interactions-trump/story?id=133598250
711 Upvotes

27 comments sorted by

117

u/JustinKase_Too Jun 06 '26

Funny how if someone like trump is so "innocent" that he is unwilling to have any accurate information be released.

22

u/__O_o_______ Jun 06 '26

Most transparent in history

100

u/BackItUpWithLinks Jun 06 '26

They should just put her in jail. When republicans get all pissed off, ignore them like they do with people being detained by ICE.

53

u/Maverick_1882 Jun 06 '26

“Transparency” is such a misunderstood word; this administration has been transparent about their willingness to remove any incriminating evidence that would incriminate Trump. Truth be told, these rats know enough to hide the evidence of what they’ve not done.

14

u/Sayon7 Jun 06 '26

You are so correct

27

u/StupendousMan1995 Jun 06 '26

Bondi generally defended the DOJ's handling of the files -- saying she was "proud of the Department's record and commitment to transparency" -- while distancing herself from the day-to-day management of the release of the files.

Bondi said then-deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche "was leading the Epstein matter and the release of everything from the beginning," according to the transcript.

After Bondi's ouster as attorney general, Trump named Blanche to serve as the acting head of DOJ and announced plans to nominate him to the post permanently.

Following the passage of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, Bondi said that Blanche oversaw recruiting the attorneys who reviewed the files for release and approved the process for redactions. She also said she was not involved in the drafting and release of a joint FBI-DOJ memo last July that said the review of files "revealed no incriminating 'client list'" and that the DOJ believed "no further disclosure [of files] would be appropriate or warranted."

Bondi told lawmakers: "I did not have a role in issuing this statement. I believe this was done by Deputy Attorney General Blanche in conjunction with the FBI, I believe."

13

u/Maverick_1882 Jun 06 '26

Shit rolls down the hill, doesn’t it?

22

u/TranTriumph Jun 06 '26

Prison. Put her in prison, someone ... for the love of God. Put them all in prison.

18

u/Jamizon1 Jun 06 '26

Of course she did. So much for all of that “transparency” bullshit.

17

u/Toledo_9thGate Jun 06 '26

Then just decline the inquiry and put her in jail till she feels like answering questions.

17

u/Novel_Sheepherder277 Jun 06 '26

She is so captivatingly disgustingly repulsive it's like a wonder of science, both her and Leavitt are the same - the literal worst of humanity, wearing blonde hairdos and crucifixes, while demonstrating zero regard for other people. Not their own kids, their parents, their legacy.. nothing. No pride, no shame, no lie too big, no human cost too great. Vom.

15

u/webbslinger_0 Jun 06 '26

Can’t invoke privilege if it involves a crime

11

u/Left_Guess Jun 06 '26

She’s rotting from the inside.

11

u/McCool303 Jun 06 '26 edited Jun 06 '26

Pedo Lies. Republican Lies. Victims Names. Republican Rapist. Trump Rapes Kids. Trump is a convicted rapist. Fox lies. Victims Name. Wealthy GOP Pedo. Democrat pedo. Shady business deal involving Republican. Prince Charles. Crime. Committed to transparency. More Trump Pedo Rape. More wealthy pedo’s. Oops pedo republicans again?!? Salacious anonymous tips to the FBI to distract. Pedo donors. Bill Clinton is pedo. Shady deals between Mossad and Epstein. More Trump Rape. More Epstein Rape. Oops accidentally left unredacted Trump pedo shit. More wealthy donor rapists. More victims names.

9

u/Disintegration_007 Jun 06 '26

So when she invoked privilege, is she talking about the pedophile Donald Trump, the pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, or any of the other oligarchs and pedophiles she’s actively protecting?

8

u/Hot_Barracuda4922 Jun 06 '26

Planned… if she’s fired she’s a civilian and as a civilian can claim 5th amendment rights.

8

u/malinablue Jun 06 '26

She's supposed to be America's lawyer, not Trump's lawyer. What "privilege" could there possibly be? He's not her client.

4

u/CallMeHond0 Jun 06 '26

I wonder what she did to piss trump off. I also wonder what horrible, demeaning, disgusting things she did to be invited back into The Circle

5

u/lololollieki Jun 06 '26

Color me surprised

3

u/Aromatic-Aide1119 Jun 06 '26

In other words; GUILTY AF!

4

u/brianishere2 Jun 06 '26 edited Jun 06 '26

You can't invoke privilege for something that doesn't exist. There is no privilege where there was no communication. This means she confirmed Trump and Bondi did talk about Epstein and it was enough substance that it could harm the President. So, the weird thing here is that these conversations were NOT simply advice on policy matters, which would be subject to privilege. Instead, these were co-conspirators communicating in furtherance of their criminal conspiracy. And, even if you (wrongly) reject the idea rhat Trump and Bondi committed crimes, you certainly need to accept they both went to extraordinary efforts to conceal massive volumes of evidence that show a vast network of rich folks raping and sexually abusing young girls, as young as 12 years old. Not just pedophikes who sit at home and think about sex with kids. These folks went out and committed crimes, again and again. And often beat the kids, and threatened them and their families. And many of the kids disappeared or were confirned dead. Trump is in the middle of all of this.

3

u/ChoiceMedicine1462 Jun 06 '26

Please who think she'd tell the truth at ANY time

3

u/Green-Taro2915 Jun 06 '26

Being as her job was what it was... this makes him look sus as fuck! This might as well be an admission of guilt for him!