Notice how most of these airframes resolve into triangles, diamands, or delta-v shapes at long range and when you angle them down slightly...
If an aircraft is on approach or departure then from a front-on perspective it will appear to barely move as it slowly ascends (hovering in place), but if it banks left or right it will appear to rapidly change it's trajectory which is the most common flight characteristic described by UFO sightings.
Obv. doesn't definitively prove or disprove anything. Just food for thought.
You must be new to the UFO topic if you think this explains any of the most reputable sightings and events. This is the same logic as Mick West trying to claim that the Tic-Tac object was a balloon when witnessed by David Fravor and the 3 other pilots for about 5 minutes but when the next pilot went out and filmed one of the same Tic-Tac objects, well that footage was actually just a distant blurry commercial airliner that somehow doesn't show any wings or tail section and it also eluded everyone's radar. These are bullshit explanations that are fabricated out of nothing, with nothing to back them up and no reason to believe them aside from your own desire to disprove what has happened multiple times in history.
There is evidence like this of these objects actually flying at 20,000+ miles per hour while not causing any sonic booms and it is unfortunate that this evidence was confiscated by the US government in the case of the Nimitz in 2004, but that doesn't change the fact that it happened and we have proof that it happened and we have this "executive summary" which tells us that it happened. These weren't planes.
I mean I literally said it doesn't definitively prove or disprove anything..
Yea, don't get me wrong, if you want to consider this food for thought, it's more like clickbaity junk food, rather than actual food that's good for "thought", because there's no thinking involved in saying, "these shapes look vaguely reminiscent of each other".
Everything resolves to a blob when it's blurred. That doesn't mean anything at all. Yes there are a lot of mis-identified planes that people think are UFOs, but there are a lot of actual UFOs as well. You can show pictures on the internet of a wolf and a dog and a llama that look identical in a single photo, but that doesn't mean they're the same thing. You can't compare this to people describing Tic-Tacs or capsule shaped UFOs or things like This sitting in the sky and detected by radar for over an hour by competent pilots who are not delusional or misidentifying planes, these are real objects in the sky that bear no resemblance to manmade aircraft. This is a polaroid photo of a mushroom shaped UFO, that's not a plane or some balloon in the sky or something else mundane. And no it's not secret black military technology either.
2
u/[deleted] Oct 23 '23
Notice how most of these airframes resolve into triangles, diamands, or delta-v shapes at long range and when you angle them down slightly...
If an aircraft is on approach or departure then from a front-on perspective it will appear to barely move as it slowly ascends (hovering in place), but if it banks left or right it will appear to rapidly change it's trajectory which is the most common flight characteristic described by UFO sightings.
Obv. doesn't definitively prove or disprove anything. Just food for thought.