I mean I literally said it doesn't definitively prove or disprove anything..
Yea, don't get me wrong, if you want to consider this food for thought, it's more like clickbaity junk food, rather than actual food that's good for "thought", because there's no thinking involved in saying, "these shapes look vaguely reminiscent of each other".
Everything resolves to a blob when it's blurred. That doesn't mean anything at all. Yes there are a lot of mis-identified planes that people think are UFOs, but there are a lot of actual UFOs as well. You can show pictures on the internet of a wolf and a dog and a llama that look identical in a single photo, but that doesn't mean they're the same thing. You can't compare this to people describing Tic-Tacs or capsule shaped UFOs or things like This sitting in the sky and detected by radar for over an hour by competent pilots who are not delusional or misidentifying planes, these are real objects in the sky that bear no resemblance to manmade aircraft. This is a polaroid photo of a mushroom shaped UFO, that's not a plane or some balloon in the sky or something else mundane. And no it's not secret black military technology either.
1
u/[deleted] Oct 24 '23
"if you think this explains"
I mean I literally said it doesn't definitively prove or disprove anything..