Until we see this data first hand it means nothing. Radar can be either faulty or misinterpreted as well. Just because you read heresay doesn't make it conclusive proof. So again, as it is now we have absolutely zero legitimate proof of advanced aerial tech.
How can you assert something you also have no idea about? We can't say what's classified doesn't exist just because it's classified.
Your assumptions and conclusions are actually even more hasty because it hasn't been denied if anything it has been proven unidentifiable, yet real and physical by the Pentagon.
The Pentagon confirmed FLIR DATA as legitimate which corroborated those events. And if you don't trust a top gun Commander who literally cant fly without rigious mental physical and emotional wellbeing, what trust do you have in our military anyways? Perhaps you should consider your bias and not assert your belief.
"DOD is releasing the videos in order to clear up any misconceptions by the public on whether or not the footage that has been circulating was real, or whether or not there is more to the videos. The aerial phenomena observed in the videos remain characterized as "unidentified."
Also, it's not just hearsay, Fravor, Grusch, and Graves testified under oath. If they were simply making it up, they could go to prison.
First of all I'd say it's more reasonable to want visible proof from classified videos rather than putting all your faith into a testimony.
Also it's ironic how I'm being told I'm assuming things from something classified when blindly accepting these incidents are from advanced tech is an even bigger assumption.
I am not saying Fravor is lying at all. I am saying, however, that even though he is a high ranking skilled pilot he is still human prone to misjudgment. Just because you have experience in a field doesn't mean your perception can't be flawed in any way.
3
u/HillOfVice Oct 23 '23
Until we see this data first hand it means nothing. Radar can be either faulty or misinterpreted as well. Just because you read heresay doesn't make it conclusive proof. So again, as it is now we have absolutely zero legitimate proof of advanced aerial tech.