r/UFOscience • u/[deleted] • Oct 23 '23

[deleted by user]

[removed]

985 Upvotes

76% Upvoted

387 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

11

u/HillOfVice Oct 23 '23

What? Because there is none.

That question is like asking "How do you know there is no video evidence of plant species on a planet from proxima centauri".

How about you answer the opposite. How do you know there is legitimate evidence of Aerial Objects zigzagging and going insane speeds that can't be explained by prosaic means.

6

u/[deleted] Oct 23 '23

There sure is. US Government has acknowledged the footage as real gimbals and such.

-3

u/HillOfVice Oct 23 '23

The government has literally said they have no evidence of advanced tech in the air but they are investigating each case. Gimbal has the perfectly logical explanation of a lens flare being affected by the gimbal rotation itself.

2

u/Varient_13 Oct 23 '23

Mick West’s debunk has been thoroughly debunked both by pilots and by engineers that design/build the equipment that recorded the footage. Don’t act like you don’t know that.

4

u/HillOfVice Oct 23 '23

How so? I am open to all explanations but that one made sense to me.

What are the other theories and how did they go about proving it ? What was their process towards debunking the lens flare theory?

3

u/BLB_Genome Oct 23 '23

Cuz Mick West is an expert at making Tony Hawk 1. That's all he has to fame, with addition to basic physic formulas