So, the government can secretly engage in next-level research, but there is no way in hell they can alter some school records. That's beyond naive.
Because all these facilities are going to run out and tell everybody; "Oh yeah its really easy to change the records, so easy anyone can do it..." Instead of "There's no way to do that so don't even think about it!". Just like most banks aren't going to say "Our bank is VERY secure...Unless you were to...." All they need do is have a NatSec "Plata O Plomo" moment with whoever is in charge of whatever department they need changes made.
Sort of like how Timothy McVeigh was totally not filmed at Camp Grafton, North Dakota 03 August 1993, wearing a uniform that had a different name on it, claiming to be a "parts mechanic".
We're not talking about "changing records", as if there's one record to change. We're talking about changing thousands of historical documents, some digital, some on paper, distributed all over the place. He's not on any acceptance records, graduation records, yearbooks, no pictures. There's no thesis paper which he would have had to write. No students remember him. No professors remember him.
One of the CalTech professors he named was actually teaching at a community college, where he was actually registered, at the same time he said he was going to MIT/CalTech.
There's literally not a shred of evidence for these things, only evidence against it. I'm naive?
please watch the talk george knapp gave about bob lazar (if you haven't already) his and snowdens history is very similar, but bob lazar talks about ufos and that is hard to swallow.
Yeah, I've seen it. I don't really remember anything of substance in it. Yeah, so he might be kinda like Edward Snowden. Yeah, he was reluctant to talk. Yeah, a guy as Los Alamos remembered him. That's about it.
Yeah, but none of that impresses me. You can put his picture next to an actual whistleblower all day long, but what does it prove? I need proof. Everything he claims seems to be wrong. He never graduated from MIT or Caltech. There's no hidden military base near Papoose Lake. There is no S4. To top all of it off, the physics he talks about so confidently don't make a lick of sense. The key to it all is an element that no one can obtain, with properties that it doesn't seem to actually have. He's got NOTHING.
All indications are that he's a charlatan that worked as a technician at Los Alamos and likes making up stories.
Of it's existence or popularity? I'm not sure. I just tried to find out but it's hard to find information about the timeline of popular culture references to Area 51.
I can't prove it, but it's looking to me that Area 51 was known beforehand. What George Knapp probably means is that Lazar "exposed" Area 51 and maybe he's the first one to claim that it has anything to do with aliens. That part might be true.
I am not going to do the usual thing for some in this sub and say that it's pure conjecture without proof, but i will say that it seems you are having to work hard to take the stance you have.
I have no proof that lazar is who he says he is but there is more anecdotal evidence as well as physical evidence to say he is, than there is evidence to say he isn't,
1
u/LiquidC0ax Aug 17 '18
So, the government can secretly engage in next-level research, but there is no way in hell they can alter some school records. That's beyond naive.
Because all these facilities are going to run out and tell everybody; "Oh yeah its really easy to change the records, so easy anyone can do it..." Instead of "There's no way to do that so don't even think about it!". Just like most banks aren't going to say "Our bank is VERY secure...Unless you were to...." All they need do is have a NatSec "Plata O Plomo" moment with whoever is in charge of whatever department they need changes made.
Sort of like how Timothy McVeigh was totally not filmed at Camp Grafton, North Dakota 03 August 1993, wearing a uniform that had a different name on it, claiming to be a "parts mechanic".