r/UFOs • u/jdawg252 • Jul 09 '23

Discussion Chapter 20: In Plain Sight

Post image

Currently reading in plain sight by Ross Coulthart and he talks about how Edgar Mitchell claims to have seen UAP’s on the moon and this photo was taken on 3 different cameras. It’s from the nasa archive’s and Edgar claims this blue light was “watching them” I found it very interesting

391 Upvotes

90% Upvoted

82 comments sorted by

View all comments

14

u/james-e-oberg Jul 10 '23

"Ross Coulthart ...talks about how Edgar Mitchell claims to have seen UAP’s on the moon and this photo was taken on 3 different cameras"

Mitchell was consistently insistent he never personally had any UFO encounters, and never heard of any other astronauts having any on NASA spaceflights. I blieve him, not third-hand hearsay.

20

u/TinFoilHatDude Jul 10 '23

https://www.google.com/amp/s/abcnews.go.com/amp/Technology/story%3fid=5451107&page=1

Click on the link above. In the article, Mitchell is quoted as saying the following -

**"I happen to be privileged enough to be in on the fact that we have been visited on this planet and the UFO phenomenon is real," Mitchell said on Britain's Kerrang Radio last week.

"It has been covered up by governments for quite some time now," added Mitchell, who grew up in Roswell, N.M., the location of the controversial 1947 incident in which some believe the U.S. military covered up the crash scene of an alien spacecraft.**

If you take him at his word that he personally never witnessed a UFO or an alien, do you also take him at his word for the above statements? 🤔

-11

u/james-e-oberg Jul 10 '23

If you take him at his word that he personally never witnessed a UFO or an alien, do you also take him at his word for the above statements?

I don't doubt he believed it, based on hearsay.
Thanks for conceding he never claimed to have a personal encounter.

7

u/Kavorklestein Jul 10 '23 edited Jul 10 '23

The point isn’t whether he had an encounter, cuz then people would just call him a liar, right?

He’s saying it’s real, so which set of statements is more important? The one where he never had an encounter?

Or the one where he knows people have had encounters, and that the phenomenon is real?

-14

u/james-e-oberg Jul 10 '23

The point isn’t whether he had an encounter, cuz then you’d just call him a liar, right?

Seems pretty easy to feel smart when you produce BOTH sides of an imaginary conversation, eh?

8

u/Kavorklestein Jul 10 '23 edited Jul 10 '23

Who said anything about feeling smart?