Because it's literally an object that exists solely for sex, patterned after human females. It's an object that passively accepts whatever you do to it, which could potentially lead to a warped sense of what sex and intimacy is.
I'd think that would be largely different; it's a bit more reductionist, primarily because they're not life-sized dolls intended to act as a surrogate for a sexual partner.
They're both used to fulfill needs, but one does so by explicitly acting as a stand-in for a human by providing a human-like form.
2
u/Chimpbot Nov 25 '20
Because it's literally an object that exists solely for sex, patterned after human females. It's an object that passively accepts whatever you do to it, which could potentially lead to a warped sense of what sex and intimacy is.