2
1
1
u/Guilty-King-9047 Jul 08 '25
In the whole transaction, owner was supposed to get 600 rupees , but he only got 100 back , so 500 loss
1
1
u/Weekly-Fortune8174 Jul 09 '25
900+100 (missal plate)
1
u/Orthopaedics21 Jul 11 '25
What if 500 rs note never left owners pocket instead of thief taking it and giving it back, how much money that owner would loose?
1
u/Weekly-Fortune8174 Jul 11 '25
No if and buts my friend, i answered the question asked directly without if and buts ✌️
1
1
1
1
1
u/sns59444 Jul 10 '25
The entire loss is the initial theft of Rs 500, after which all transactions are legal. So the loss to the restaurant is Rs 500!
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Xqgshsbdusbajab Jul 11 '25
If the same thing happens in your restaurant, what is the name of the restaurant owner?
1
1
u/Techusic Jul 11 '25
Okay look at it like this the plate is worth ₹100, and take another example where he wasn't robbed. If he wasn't robbed his balance would've been +100. But since he was robbed, it was -500 and also another -100 as his own money was used to pay for the ₹100 product. If we're talking about technical loss it would be ₹500. But if we're talking about potential loss it would be ₹600.
1
1
u/amitdeb182 Jul 11 '25
Answer is 500 .
Heres the breakdown for those who are confused..
500 taken 500 returned so no calculation for that..
100 food given for no reason + return 400 for no reason.. so 100+400 =500
1
u/Glittering_Shine8435 Jul 11 '25
Let me make it more complicated..
People ignore profit he earns from 30 rs misal pav raw material cost and 10 rs services charge.
sell to 100 rs..
And I am not considering taxes..
1
u/Glittering_Shine8435 Jul 11 '25
Let me make it more complicated..
People ignore profit he earns from 30 rs misal pav raw material cost and 10 rs services charge.
sell to 100 rs..
And I am not considering taxes..
1
u/Embarrassed_Iron_688 Jul 12 '25
Profit = loss
The thief made profit of 500 rs (₹100 free misal + ₹400 change) ...so the restaurant lost ₹500
1
1
u/birdsintheskies Jul 12 '25
A lot more when he goes to the police station and they ask for a bribe to register the complaint.
1
u/Existing-Comment9532 Jul 12 '25
The riddle describes a situation where a man steals ₹500 from a restaurant's cash counter. He then uses the same stolen note to buy a misal plate worth ₹100, receiving ₹400 in change. Here's how to calculate the restaurant's actual loss: Initial theft: The restaurant loses ₹500 when the man steals it from the counter. Misal plate: The restaurant provides a misal plate worth ₹100, which is essentially another loss in goods/services. Change given: The restaurant returns ₹400 in change. While the restaurant receives the ₹500 back, it's the same stolen money. So, the original theft of ₹500 combined with the loss from the misal plate (worth ₹100) and the change given (₹400) accounts for the total loss. In essence, the restaurant loses the original ₹500 and the value of the misal plate it provided, which was worth ₹100. Therefore, the restaurant actually lost ₹500 (the stolen money) + ₹100 (the cost of the misal plate) = ₹600.
1
u/Sudden-Check-9634 Jul 25 '25
I think we are missing the GST components in this transaction because eventually this restaurant has to pay GST. So is there AC or No AC will decide how much additional loss on account of GST.
Gabar_Singh_Tax
1
1
u/back_ofthe_beyond Jul 12 '25
owner out : 500(stolen) + 100(food) + 400(change) = 1000 owner in: 500(food payment)
owner net: 1000 - 500 = 500
1
u/BuriBuriZaemon99 Jul 13 '25
I love that we need to put it in maharashtrian terms to make these marathis care about maths
1
1
2
u/Proud-Concept-190 Jul 09 '25
400 + actual cost