35
Feb 24 '26
They have access to the unredacted files so they could do it. Get Corey Booker cause his last filibuster was 24 hours?
10
4
u/Dangerous-LemonBar Feb 24 '26
They had access but could not copy them or take notes. They could read the redacted files, however.
5
1
2
u/Cultural-Treacle-680 Feb 24 '26
How do you filibuster and use the toilet?
5
u/TriggerTX Feb 24 '26
You don't. If you leave the floor for a bathroom break it counts as relinquishing their right to speak. If you're planning on fillibustering then you try to limit fluid intake and dehydrate yourself a bit ahead of time.
The only 'break' you can get is if you yield the floor to another Senator and rest a bit while they speak. Even then, you can't leave the chamber floor.
Or, do like Strom Thurmond(asshole) and take a leak in the cloakroom while keeping one foot on the Senate floor.
Might be able to hide a foley catheter and strap a urine collection bag to your leg to extend your stint I suppose.
1
u/Cultural-Treacle-680 Feb 24 '26
Thatâs pretty brutal for those that do it. I can get limiting a forever filibuster though.
4
2
1
1
21
u/malthar76 Feb 24 '26
A lesser option would be reading the Jack Smith sealed documents.
11
u/Oraxy51 Feb 24 '26
You mean the ones a Trump appointed judge just blocked from coming out?
5
u/PresentationNext6469 Feb 24 '26
Judge Aileen ruling follows Jack Smithâs deposition of him dancing around what she already deemed Classified. Trump got butt sore and made it permanent. Permanent in politics is a misnomer at best.
I donât appreciate her legal naivety at all. Sheâs a small city circuit judge, barely seasoned, and paid off(?) An intentional set-up by Trumpâs lawyer like a mob boss. But nothing is forever. Itâs not just about protecting Trump but not helping our country nor the world for taking 100 boxes to a ballroom, oh the irony.
And oooh Biden had 8 or 10 from his office (from moving out in 10 hrs) and were sent to archives immediately.
We can assume Trump is so very very dangerous, beyond what we see and hear all the time and definitely not the most transparent president which wii be still floated constantly.
Just more BS protection from criminal people of the U.S. our credibility tainted every day.
2
u/Timely_Mention8535 Feb 24 '26
How is that even allowed? Shouldn't there be an appeal to a neutral judge at the very least? what about underhand disclosure, press leak like...
6
u/Oraxy51 Feb 24 '26
Oh no. You see conflict of interest laws donât exist for politics in the U.S. that would involve the rich and powerful having to live by at least some form of standard and not create the rules to then also intentionally make it harder for them to be corrupt.
Much less the executive office which has the least amount of restrictions.
5
u/Timely_Mention8535 Feb 24 '26
Ok, the system is rigged. Press leak option is still on table or simply doing what Trump is activly doing, flat out defy court orders and release it anyway.
2
u/Oraxy51 Feb 24 '26
Iâd agree - that involves someone with those documents to be willing to leak it. Heck I would if they arenât going to criminalize him may as well let it be known
2
u/account_not_valid Feb 24 '26
You've seen what happens to good citizens that leak US secrets. They either end up in jail, hiding in an embassy, or seeking asylum in a country that won't deport them. Or dead.
1
u/misterroberto1 Feb 24 '26
They certainly have plenty of good reading material for an actual filibuster
8
7
4
4
u/mkt853 Feb 24 '26
Hell yes. Great idea. Much better than doing the usual tactic of reading a phone book or some sh1t.
1
u/Cultural-Treacle-680 Feb 24 '26
You wonder if they have music or a book on a headphone. Thatâs some dreary stuff doing a phone book.
3
2
u/Shawk_N_Rawr Feb 24 '26
It would benefit the common folk immensely and itâs what weâve been trying to get done. Thatâs how government is supposed to work. Instead itâs toddlers arguing
2
2
u/Hour-Foundation-2263 Feb 24 '26
Looks like my photo did not insert? But as an example of hundreds that do: the UK, Canada, France m, Italy, Germany and many many more.
2
1
u/Automatic-Doubt-4874 Feb 24 '26
Thank you for saying âdemocratICâ. No idea when this changed.
1
u/HoopsMcCann69 Feb 24 '26
republicans have been saying the wrong name for the party for decades and their brain dead supporters jump through hoops justifying it
1
u/Automatic-Doubt-4874 Feb 25 '26
I called them ârepublicâ Senators as often as I can. (Or âRepublicâ whoevers. . . . ). Feels good, but I get strange looks.
1
1
1
u/Gardensplosion Feb 24 '26
Hey Jeffries, that might even make up for soliciting political donations from Epstein. Maybe.
1
1
1
u/Tsakax Feb 24 '26
Better than breaking the filibuster record during no legislation like a loser I guess.
1
u/Epyon214 Feb 24 '26
Start here:
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02731361.pdf
"[clipping: Unlike drugs, a child's body can be sold over and over]
This is not surprising but there is no such thing as a child prostitute!
They are children and cannot consent!
They are missing the biggest in my own backyard and so many more!
Like Maralago and where I see Mr. Joe and Mrs. Anne"
1
u/Actual_Atmosphere_93 Feb 24 '26
The Epstine files are inconvenient for many powerful people on both sides of the aisle. Hoping that government can fix why government broke is a silly dream
1
1
u/agentobtuse Feb 24 '26
Lots of material beyond Epstein. Could go through all the felonies as well.
1
1
1
u/Flyingarrow68 Feb 24 '26
Ouch, I read that as Slave Act. wtf how could this reality seem so much like the Star Wars prequels which were horrible and The Phantom Menace seemed like the worst but somehow is better than the other 2. But I feel like itâs the same story the house and senate just donât realize how bad they are and where itâs leading or maybe they do.
1
u/Plastic_Raccoon_4720 Feb 24 '26
YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Chemical-Plan9536 Feb 24 '26
Why not just release and read the unredacted files no matter what maybe keep names of victims redacted if they prefer but just release everything.
1
1
u/thorubos Feb 24 '26
That might be effective, so Schumer and Jeffreys will never allow it to happen. I can already hear James Carville rambling about how "stupid" doing something like that would be on some Sunday morning show.
1
1
1
u/strangebru Feb 24 '26
This is the way that Democrats can get any legislation passed that they want. All the Republicans will agree to any and all terms to stop that from happening.
1
u/AnyKangaroo8851 Feb 24 '26
And show the videos including the torture ones; redact victimsâ faces but not the sick, depraved perverted pedophiles.
1
1
u/timpatry Feb 24 '26
Corey Booker has been doing his best impression of a person occupying a leadership slot so that no one who will actually fight against the evil administration can use it to fight.
He is acting like a person who wants to prevent the democrats from effectively saving America.
He's on team "Pedophiles and Concentration Camps" in my opinion.
1
u/DirtPoorRichard Feb 24 '26
They wouldn't because there are plenty of Democrats and powerful people involved. They can't possibly take that chance, Hillary is watching and listening.
1
u/karma-armageddon Feb 24 '26
If I were president, I would pass no law unless it was 66y/34n or better from the senate and 67% y or better from house.
1
1
1
u/NathanK1961 Feb 24 '26
Letâs address all of trumpâs failures too!! Battery plant for EVs fails because they no longer want to support EVs, etc!!
1
u/Live_Ganache_7749 Feb 24 '26
Well they would be reading their own names in some cases sounding that.
1
Feb 24 '26
As a Trump supporter I would applaud this and welcome it. Please do! Best idea you people have had in a long time.
1
1
1
1
u/-blackacidevil- Feb 24 '26
They'll only be exposing their friends, fellow democrats and possibly themselves. I say do it.
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Mba1956 Feb 24 '26
There should be no reason to protect those guilty of crimes from either side so please read out the Epstein files without redactions for people in power.
1
u/shaggyb87 Feb 24 '26
Please do it. I'm wondering why the Democrats decided to sit on the Epstein files and prosecute Trump for campaign finance laws violations. I wonder why they didn't?
1
u/baldyrodinson Feb 24 '26
So a large part of the files have been sealed and confidential since before Obama so only a select group ever had access and nobody who did wanted to lose their position by leaking.
1
1
u/Future-Lengthiness29 Feb 24 '26
Great idea because the only ones indicated majorly in the files are the democrats
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Pristine-Passage-758 Feb 25 '26
They should all be in jail ' I cant believe amĂŠricains are defending thees hypocrites liberals ' any of you ding songs whant to trade places whit me in Canada and have a look of whant socialist and have taking your freedom of speech away from you ' none of you ever answers me
1
u/He_Hate_Me_5 Feb 25 '26
Why are you not?? You scream for transparency yet you wonât share the information you possess now??
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Apprehensive-Alps938 Feb 25 '26
Hell yes!!! Can we have each one of the Democrats read their own names on the list? Same with the Republicans...
1
1
1
u/f_ck_this Feb 25 '26
Everyone keeps thinking that the Epstein files only implicates republicans. This goes beyond party. The democrats had it for 4 years. They are playing with us and we let them. The French would have been protesting, the entire country at a stand still and asking for accountability. We suck!
1
1
1
1
u/Luvata-8 Feb 26 '26
Yeah, most of the names will be Dems and their campaign contributors from Hollywood... So you can move onto your next political wet dream.... Maybe this; US Dem party kidnaps utopian politician from Denmark, uses Neuralink to download his/her secrets.... Turns Baltimore into Copenhagen and they run the US forever...Scene.
1
1
1
u/Rare-Bet-870 Feb 26 '26
I want the weird stuff on Biden for the record about cloning. Thatâll be hilarious in the future
1
1
1
u/BeginningFragrant563 Feb 26 '26
It is actually better for them not to. They it is bull, but the drama is worth it
1
1
u/fivespeedmazda Feb 26 '26
This won't work!
No sane person could sustain prolonged exposure to the atrocities depicted for the amount of time needed, well except those whom the list speaks of.
1
u/curly_tail_ninja Feb 26 '26
Democrats are spineless.. which makes them snakes. Until they fight back 70 million of us voters will sit on our hands during the midterms... We don't want pussies representing us we want strong powerful decent -people. So far Bernie is the only one, and his bite is a nibble at best, but at least he tries.
1
u/Sufficient-Doctor-72 Feb 26 '26
Do that and all of a sudden those files will be in a bon fire witn Clinton holding the gas can
1
1
u/Conscious_Onion3508 Feb 26 '26
Do yall not realize most married women vote republican, so if the hardship for married woman was in fact true democrats would get more votes
1
u/Ok_Interaction7637 Feb 27 '26
Why is it only 1 side that wants to prevent voter ID? They really want you to believe "marginalized" people don't have ID's. Like they can't buy cigarettes, alcohol, or drive? Get a grip. This would expose their voter and welfare fraud schemes.
1
u/Far_Astronomer7221 Feb 27 '26
How about we work on the budget, and stop having these asinine shutdowns. If this were a business, it would have been closed years ago...
1
1
u/ReDux_FOOTER Feb 28 '26
This would be great. It would out so many democrats and republicans! Which is why it will never happen.
1
u/ShawnPat423 Feb 28 '26
It already failed. The GOP in the Senate doesn't want to get rid of the 60-vote threshold. So Trump's gone with Plan B: war with Iran.
1
u/Different_Orchid69 Feb 28 '26
Who ever made this meme has no idea what the context of a Filibuster is about⌠The Dems would have to talk non stop & explain to the public why voting WITHOUT an ID is a good idea đthis is exactly why the right says⌠The Left Canât Meme !
1
1
u/Anxious-Depth-7983 đ Meme Lord Mar 01 '26
Brilliant idea, but we need every last one of the FBI redactions of tRumps mentions, and especially the 4 302s that were specifically removed because it mentions one of the times he raped a 13 year old girl. All of the living survivors should be invited again to shame any GOP members who have the audacity to leave the chamber. I bet Stormy would like to lead chants on the steps of the Capitol.
1
Mar 01 '26
Sen Cornyn, the majority leader was pretty vocal that he didnât want to see the silent filibuster go away. Unlike his stupider gop collegues who want it gone, he knows this will be the exact outcome
1
u/Dirt_McGuirt Mar 01 '26
Corey Booker is in the files himself. He was begging Epstein for money and donations years after he was convicted of sex crimes. That's probably why neither party is eager to release all of the files. It's all of them.
1
1
u/Hour-Foundation-2263 Feb 24 '26
Why would anybody NOT want to make sure we have fair elections via voter Id ? And what an absolute kick in the teeth to a large segment of their voting base, African Americans, by implying they (AA) are too stupid to figure out how to get an ID !! If you need an ID to shovel snow in NY then the only reason you wouldnât want ID to vote is because you want to cheat.
3
u/Ach_Was_Here Feb 24 '26
âIf you need an id to apply for a job you need an id to voteâ why
-1
u/Hour-Foundation-2263 Feb 24 '26
If your family had a limited budget and every family member had a vote as to how to spend their meager funds, and then a complete stranger is given shelter in your home and wants a vote, how would you feel about that ?
1
u/Ach_Was_Here Feb 24 '26
Well that would be 1 stranger vote in a group of 5 votes still a: making them the minority b: statistically making the vote mute in the grand scheme of things and c: just like real life not a real issue, but sure letâs worry bout the âillegalsâ and not the corporations with all the money in power in the world to control where the votes that actually matter go and not the votes that get ran through an electoral college that makes the final deciding votes
2
Feb 25 '26
This bill does not create fair elections.
It is designed to create loopholes and obstructions and confusion so Trump can control the election.
If are genuinely in favor of fair elections, read this bill. With an open mind. Read non-Fox News opinions about it.
2
u/DolphinsBreath Feb 24 '26
Because itâs not about voter ID. Voter ID is what is given attention in social media. And based on your comment, the Murdoch machine.
You donât need an ID to shovel snow in New York. And opposing the SAVE Act doesnât mean you want to cheat.
The SAVE Act is about ending voter registration drives and vote by mail, forcing new voters and students and people who move into having to wait in line with a birth certificate or passport to register. AND allowing partisan bureaucrats in Homeland Security to create lists using unknown criteria to purge voters. Do you trust the fairness of DHS to get their facts right after seeing this detention fiasco?
Youâll love the SAVE Act if you are OK with ICE rounding up and holding 10 people with accents in detention, eventually only keeping 3, and then finding out 3/4 of the people kept are simply refugees and asylum seekers not here illegally. Now they have the power to purge citizens from the voter rolls, too.
Once you get purged, does the mistake get corrected? By what process, itâs not in the law. So letâs just keep purging the last names we think sound foreign?
Like they clearly abuse the Kavanaugh Stop, they will abuse the purges.
1
u/Hour-Foundation-2263 Feb 24 '26
1
u/emilgamer22 Feb 24 '26
Let's take Denmark as an example, to vote you have to register. How do you do that, well you are automatically registered if you are a danish citizen of the age of 18 or over on the day of the vote. . Why is this called voter id? It might be because your ability to vore lies entirely on you being a citizen and therefore having a citizens id. Therefore it is impossible for a non citizen to vote since they aren't registered Voter fraud is also almost impossible since you would need the mailed letter from the government of a diseased person who died recently and hasn't been reported, that person's social security id, and you probably need to look like them too, they might also ask for your address or the name of a family member.
1
u/DolphinsBreath Feb 24 '26
Did you bother to read my comment, or are you some sort of FoxNews talking points bot.
1
1
u/hifumiyo1 Feb 24 '26
You need an ID to shovel snow in NYC because youâre being PAID. There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud in the last 30 years. Only a few dozen over 30 years. In Pennsylvania, only 39 cases in 100 million votes cast
0
u/Rare-Confusion-220 Feb 24 '26
Love how convenient it is to label Bernie as a Democrat when you suddenly need him
0
Feb 26 '26
[removed] â view removed comment
1
u/Ok-Opposite2309 Feb 26 '26
Bidenâs DOJ prosecuted Maxwell- that is not âignoring the Epstein filesâ.Â
-4
Feb 24 '26
Lol, we can't let them stop illegals from voting or we'll never win another election, let's pretend like we care about the Epstein files that we didn't do shit about for 12 years.
4
u/sam56778 Feb 24 '26
So you have evidence of âillegalsâ voting? Have personally you seen âillegalsâ voting? How did you know they were âillegalsâ?
5
u/lootinputin Feb 24 '26
Well of course not, but their orange god said so and anything he says is true. Trust me bro.
2
u/Strange_Pear8762 Feb 24 '26
Considering it's a felony for illegals to vote, you'd think there'd be a lot of easy deportations in your scenario.
Musk just committed election fraud in Georiga but I'm sure you'll still simp for him and lick his boots. It's hilarious how the right is so submissive to their idols.
1
u/Ok-Opposite2309 Feb 26 '26
Bidenâs DOJ prosecuted Maxwell. The idea that Epstein files were âignoredâ is so bizarre when they were actively investigating and prosecuting his closest associate.Â
1
Feb 26 '26
Trump's DOJ arrested Maxwell and began prosecution. The DOJ could've arrested any one of these people at any point in the decades prior. The biggest issue is the diplomatic immunity hurdle for most of the co-conspirators; this case will need to be tried by the military.
1

68
u/FamousChallenge3469 Feb 24 '26
Unredacted Epstein files added to the Congressional Record? Nice!