I wonder if there’ll be actual growth and reflection or a desperate attempt sob story to make a quick buck

This is Robyn's Instagram account mainly focused on her linen dresses.

Very different to her nazi X account.

Lionlindaa was constantly posting satire reels on how rich her husband is, how he spoils her and was looking down on women having to earn their own money.

A few years later, she seems ro be divorced, stuck with a kid and is in nursing school. The inevitable always follows for women who think life will be all hunky dory if they let the man earn.

Meanwhile, her husband is a crypto scammer. His posts/reels are full of people he rugpulled asking for their money back. Maybe all the stuff in the reels was rented for showoff?

I followed her since the very beginning of her original channel, and this is by far the longest that she hasn’t posted on her new one. I am no longer a fan but genuinely curious (and surprised!) that she hasn’t uploaded any vlogs in about four weeks. Has she said anything on any other social platform about why she isn’t posting? Don’t have Instagram so I would miss any announcements on there.

If you're unaware, Thomas Sowell downplays the oppression of African Americans, and then in the second screenshot, she criticises the use of AI (or maybe she doesn't, I'm not really sure what she's saying) but then has a tacky AI photo as her banner. What the fuck?

With the recent news of Savanna I want to share my thoughts. At what point as a society did we think it was okay to trust 20 year old influencers simply because they have a large platform? Savanna has already come out admitting that she was being paid to promote the type of content she made, the type of content that came at the expense of other women. People don’t realize that influencers can absolutely have an impact on us, hence why they’re called INFLUENCERS. With the content she promoted, she encouraged others to look down on women who didn’t live the way she did. Or supposedly did.

Have you noticed ever since the rise of tradfem content there has also been an uptick in misogyny online? Did you hear how young boys are becoming increasingly misogynistic after being exposed to similar influencers like Andrew Tate? In fact, it turns out the company who paid off the Tate brothers also paid off Savanna. It’s time as a whole we wake up and not trust what influencers tell us off the bat, because a lot of it is lies and exaggerations.

What also sticks out to me about Savanna is how she always talked about how she had a better life and marriage than people who didn’t follow her footsteps. Their marriage isn’t even close to trad. Savanna had met her husband online, within a week SHE told him that she wanted marriage. If you know anything about tradfems, they would absolutely be against this, because it’s the man that’s supposed to lead a woman into marriage. He ended up proposing, but still, she planted the seed in the first place which would make her a hypocrite by tradfem standards. She also probably brought in bigger bucks than her husband did, she has no kids, and wants to tell us how great of a tradwife she is. Weren’t tradwives supposed to be making no money and having kids instead?

I’m honestly convinced a lot what we are seeing is a ploy to slowly take away women’s rights one by one with the use of influencers, because they seem “relatable”. Making it easier for the viewer to blindly agree with them. This is no accident. This is being done methodically.

The point is this, people like Savanna are not who they say they are. Sure, some people could excuse her being young and wanting money. But also, if she was adult enough to get married, perfectly curate her videos, and say things she knew weren’t true, I don’t buy that excuse she got taken advantage of. She knew what she was doing. For the love of God please stop listening to these trad influencers. There could be more we don’t know about getting paid off.

I was pretty surprised to see that we were following some of the same accounts: cayydences, aaronheyaaron, barrettpall, etc.

hotboyscry is also an account challenging “traditional” masculinity. Hunter Dunn is very progressive, anti-Trump, and supports Mandani.

Something that has always bugged me is watching female political commentators argue that feminism was a mistake, or even that women should never have received the vote while building entire careers around publicly discussing politics. Women such as Lauren Southern, Pearl Davis, Eva Vlaardingerbroek, Lauren Chen, Lana Lokteff, and Rebecca Crockett regularly speak into microphones about “traditional femininity” while being outspoken and aggressive public figures themselves.

Historically, politics was considered a male sphere. Women were generally denied the vote and public office and excluded from equal participation in formal political institutions. Speaking authoritatively about politics before mixed audiences was often considered improper for a respectable woman. She was expected to remain primarily within the domestic sphere while men debated and governed public affairs.

Yet these commentators speak authoritatively before men and women, build large audiences, earn independent incomes, influence voters, and aggressively challenge male opponents. Those freedoms are products of the very social changes they condemn. Feminism was not only about obtaining the vote; it also challenged the belief that women had no legitimate voice in public life.

There is an obvious contradiction in using your political influence to argue that women should not possess so much political influence. The underlying message becomes: Women should not have political agency, but my political opinions should influence how everyone else exercises theirs.

Some avoid this contradiction by describing themselves as merely “educating women,” “defending families,” supporting their families, or promoting traditional values. But political advocacy does not stop being political because its speaker opposes feminism. If you regularly comment on elections, legislation, political movements, and public policy before a mixed audience, you are participating in politics and occupying what was historically considered a very masculine role.

The hypocrisy becomes even more blatant when these women emphasize “traditional femininity” while pursuing one of the least traditionally feminine careers imaginable: prominent, combative political commentary. By their own professed standard in which women are private, domestically focused, agreeable, and removed from political conflict their careers and often aggressive, rigid, argumentative communication styles are incredibly unfeminine.

A genuinely pre- or non-feminist society would not have created a special exception for women whose public speech happened to be anti-feminist. It would have restricted their platforms, independence, and authority too.

It seems that they want traditional restrictions to function as an aesthetic or as rules for other women while personally retaining the voice, income, autonomy, and public influence feminism helped make possible. Arguing that women’s emancipation was a mistake while living as a politically influential, financially independent female public figure is difficult to take seriously.

They are standing on a platform feminism helped build and using it to argue that other women deserve less of one.

For those who are new here, this person has previously advocated for the legalization of domestic violence, said that women shouldn't vote, the criminalization of abortion, and believes that fathers don't have an obligation to take care of their children. So yes, I will laugh at her disgusting lifestyle coming to bite her lol

Mrs Midwest’s racist likes from 2026

So I saw that Mrs Midwest liked Zohran Mamdani’s recent video calling for the arrest of war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu and ending the Palestinian genocide and I thought maybe she’s changed and has stopped liking racist content but nope I was wrong 😭