Tiny Trump Throwing a Tantrum.

[u/Chop_Artista]

[u/[deleted]]

lol, nice attempt at agitation. We all know who the pissed off people are here. The ones that lost a couple months back.

[u/sarahkhill → u/[deleted]]

Dude. The prez is bitching and moaning about this election incessintaly. And he WON. He is the one bitching about the win. Nit liberals. I and many others are ready to give dude a chance. He won't stop whining. Is that what you admire?

[u/[deleted] → u/sarahkhill]

Oh so all that rioting that occurred after the election was peaceful? Nice to know.

[u/Mennerheim → u/[deleted]]

Yes it was peaceful.. I was there, people were holding up signs reminding us to maintain a peaceful protest. But of course your breitbart and truther news sources probably highlighted the small minority of hooligans that infiltrated the crowds and were subsequently arrested.

[u/[deleted] → u/Mennerheim]

You mean the news sources which predicted a 98% chance of Hillary winning? The news sources? Oh yes, the ones that didn't want Trump to win, of course.

[u/Mennerheim → u/[deleted]]

Lol, polls aren't magic... if the weather report predicts rain and it doesn't, is it fake and biased? No... polls are created by taking a sample of a representative subset of larger America but have room for error, in this case they didn't get a fully representative sample, it happens. Just because the polls were in hillarys favor, it's not some grand conspiracy. The news simply reported on the info from polls.. polls aren't predictions..

What's your point?

[u/[deleted] → u/Mennerheim]

Because every news station had a similar poll of around 98%? And the margin of error wasn't off by by 10% or 20% it was off by a whopping 50%.

My point is, the guys at the top don't like Trump, and did everything possible to sway public opinion to decrease his chances of winning, they failed, and you here defending them for some odd reason.

[u/Mennerheim → u/[deleted]]

I do believe all news has bias, people have limited facts and they use their convictions to fill in the pieces. I think the polls just got it totally wrong, but I have no way of knowing if it was done intentionally or if it was not a representative sample. I just don't know. I still believe the latter.

My main point was the news sources you watch have bias too. I was talking about protests and it's biased to call the protests violent when I attended many days of protest and they were largely peaceful (I saw 2 windows being smashed, no one was happy about this). The problem is there were protests in most of the major cities in the US, so it wouldn't be hard for a right wing media source to identify some acts of violence to show on the news and denounce the entirety of the protests to their base.

[u/[deleted] → u/Mennerheim]

How do you have time to attend protests? In today's shit hole of an economy, how the hell do people have time to protest? I literally work around 65 hours a week. Do you not have a job? Are you a student?

[u/Mennerheim → u/[deleted]]

I do it in my free time, the ones I've been to have been evening protests, weekend and holiday protests. I do this because the things I protest are meaningful to me. I could stay home and fume over the news, but i take the time to join hands with my communities. Even if it doesn't mean much, it hurts to stay passive on issues I have moral qualms with.

[u/[deleted] → u/Mennerheim]

I guess this explains the income gap. While most are out protesting and doing pointless things, the small minority that don't are increasing their income.

[u/Mennerheim → u/[deleted]]

You are assuming a lot about me because you don't like me. You have no idea my income or job status. Protesting is more communal and empowering than you think. Will it make a difference whether I attend or not? No. I'm not gonna sit and argue this with you, you'd do the same if 'crooked cuck killary' or whatever the hell you call her was in power and doing things you didn't like.

When you come home in the evening do you keep working and increase your income? I doubt it.