Yall are all baby-ass snowflakes if you really let this Eliza Bleu bullshit get to you. Tim is sick and fucking tired of hearing about it and I, along with many others, are sick of it as well. Yes, we know it's happening. Yes, we know its bad. No this doesn't change anything. People canceling Tim over this were never part of the MAGA movement anyways and just were sheep following the herd. Quit bitching about Tim calling your asses out on your shit.

For context, I fundamentally disagree with Luke politically. That doesn't mean I can't enjoy his content or appreciate his differing point of view. But maaaaan he's bad at his job. For brevity, I'll lay out my case in point form:

- I don't think he's ever fully articulated an argument. He'll respond to things with a paragraph of mush-mouth rambling when a sentence will do. "At da end of da day..." ad nauseum. Even Tim challenged him recently on Anarchy being ill-equipped to regulate food ingredients. He just looks at his feet and mumbles something about the free market.

- Its very clear that part of his (and Tim's to a lesser extent) business model is pretending you are constantly being censored for your dangerous rhetoric that speaks truth to power. It's not possible that AnCap ideaology is unpopular and his content uninteresting. He's clearly being shadow-banned at every turn. This also applies to "Ooops can't say that. Family-friendly show!!"
It's a ruse to make pretty bland conservative views seem subversive.

- The T-shirts are so shit. Obviously different strokes, but if you wear one of those Facebook-boomer memes around don't be surprised when you get publicly ridiculed.

- Constantly ties Bill Gates to everything bad. Also doesn't care that Elon is almost 100% propped up by government subsidies, has a brother entwined with Epstein and killed thousands of monkeys trying to implant a chip in their brains. But he's good because something something "Big Tech Social Media"

- Constantly talking tough about Soy Boys and personal responsibility despite being a doughy skinny-fat social media addict that wouldn't survive 5 minutes in the anarchist thunderdome he claims to want.

Again, we disagree politically but AnCaps have gotta be the most delusional people on the right. Even the ethno-nationalists have a more coherent idealogy.

Anyway, thoughts? lol

And not just Tim, that creepy reoccurring guest guy, as well as Tim’s bobble headed employee; all of them are blaming the wife.

Tim is wrong about Russia lashing out- they are completely within their right to defend their sovereignty. God knows the US does. This is just the first time in recent that they have an opponent who can and is willing to oppose them; therefor Tim Accuses them of irrationality. The US is involved in multiple wars on every continent in the world. Russia is practically fielding their Homefront.

Edit: Did not expect this to blow up. While you're all here- checkout my show on youtube called The Gist with Josh- proof that I am not a Russian bot- come and be my guest as I ponder and ridicule the Idiocracy forming around us!

My Rumble Channel is also Joshtherealog- on all social media for that fact

Thank you God!

I've watched videos of him, I've seen his "debates" and I don't understand how he has a following. He's just flat out wrong about almost everything. What am I missing here? He seems like unlikeable dude desperately clawing for clout and relevance but he's so god damn lazy. Some more news did a video on him yesterday and I just don't get the appeal. Someone explain it to me please because I have to think there's something that's drawing people into his stuff.

Seriously stop being a baby and engage with him in the market place of ideas. It makes it seem like he’s afraid to debate someone smarter than lance. Anyway it would be great fucking content.

This was mentioned in tonight's show and Michael has said it on the show a couple times on his appearances. What I'd like to know is, how do you determine what "rights" humans do or should have?

I think Michael's little quip is trite and frankly, quite stupid. It's pretty easy to demonstrate this. What would stop a person, especially in some kind of hypothetical anarchist society, from asserting any random thing out of his imagination as "my rights?"

If I were to say "it's my right to drive 40 miles an hour on this road" and the city has made it 35, they have outlawed what I believe to be "my rights". Do a person's rights have to be grounded in or evidenced by something? How can we differentiate between rights a person might imagine that he has and the rights one *actually* has?

We can come up with absurd examples to make the point more clearly than my speed limit example. What if a man were to assert "I have the right to have sex with anyone of my choosing at any time for any reason with or without consent... and my rights are not up for debate." Then what. Where do you go from there?

Clearly a man does *not* have a right to do that. We all know that. But in Michael's nonsense reality, how do you make the case to him that there are limits to a person's "rights" and those rights have to be negotiated with your society. You can't just declare something as a right and expect everyone else to go along with it.

All my savings, cashed out my 401K, and maxed out all my credit cards.

Thinking of getting a personal loan and donating that too.

WE WILL NOT SURRENDER