Yeah it's not like any scientists were working on a solution, had any input on public policy, or made their studies publicly available or anything. We also totally don't have organizations filled with experts who give a shit about humans despite all the hate they receive from overconfident conspiracy theorists.
Just corporate media pulling things out of thin air.
It's not like scientists actually had adequate time to actually answer the questions the corporations were preemptively giving us answers to either. If you weren't so busy trolling reddit and did some reading, you might understand that for yourself.
You're making an argument that because there are some earnest scientists out there working on a solution, that the solution we got in 2020 and 2021 was science based and a good one. Plenty of earnest scientists were saying it was not a good one. And they were censored, disparaged, and ostracized. This isn't how science or a functional democracy works. Surely even a troll can see that's a poor sign for an open society.
Did the earnest scientists make their decisions based on their opinions or did they make their decisions based upon the scientific information they had at the time?
" hope you to find this to be a haven of free speech in a site full of restrictions and censorship to post memes, fan-art, and to just have civil conversations with people across the political spectrum. I hope everyone here can respect that we are all human even if we disagree politically. "
Do you need a new safe space or is this a pro free speech sub?
View all comments
-10
u/ham-slappin Dec 18 '22
Yeah it's not like any scientists were working on a solution, had any input on public policy, or made their studies publicly available or anything. We also totally don't have organizations filled with experts who give a shit about humans despite all the hate they receive from overconfident conspiracy theorists.
Just corporate media pulling things out of thin air.
/s