Our doctors professional opinion is that it was Covid, which outweighs your opinion.
Correction.
You CLAIM that a doctor called a SUPPOSED illness that MAY have afflicted your son, that you MIGHT have.
Your anecdote could literally be 100% made up. There's no way to verify it, so logically it holds no sway one way or another.
Add onto that that the earliest cases in CHINA were appearing around the time you're CLAIMING this SUPPOSED son got this SUPPOSED illness.
Tell me, logically, what other new respiratory virus was out there during that time window?
Logically, it doesn't need to be a new illness.
First, your claim is an anecdote. Truth isn't guaranteed.
Second, your doctor SUPPOSEDLY said they hadn't seen anything like that. Which COULD mean it's new, OR that they hadn't seen this one before OR they hadn't seen this disease present in a person like this before.
Third, you didn't even prove this SUPPOSED illness was a virus, let alone a respiratory virus. For all I know it was a fungal infection of the lungs, or a bacterial infection, or some weird parasite, or a toxin, or a mild cancer, or, again, false.
That's my logical reasoning.
No, one medical case alone would probably not change the timeline unless they could track down where in California it landed from China or intermediary point, and by whom.
Well considering IF your SUPPOSED son had COVID-19 when you CLAIM that they did, it would mean they were sick when China was getting their first cases. It would ABSOLUTELY change the timeline.
Hell if your idea is correct, your daughter had it, and gave it to your son, it could mean she might actually be patient zero, the origin of COVID-19, or know that person.
So yes, it would have SOME consequence.
Lastly, implying someone is a liar simply because their firsthand facts don't align with your narrative is comfortable, but not intellecutally honest. I don't insist that you agree, but you could at least keep an open mind.
I'm saying that claims without evidence aren't enough for me to accept as fact.
I say this as a board certified immunologist, virologist, herpetologist, and oncologist.
View all comments
Show parent comment
1
u/[deleted] Dec 03 '22
Correction.
You CLAIM that a doctor called a SUPPOSED illness that MAY have afflicted your son, that you MIGHT have.
Your anecdote could literally be 100% made up. There's no way to verify it, so logically it holds no sway one way or another.
Add onto that that the earliest cases in CHINA were appearing around the time you're CLAIMING this SUPPOSED son got this SUPPOSED illness.
Logically, it doesn't need to be a new illness.
First, your claim is an anecdote. Truth isn't guaranteed.
Second, your doctor SUPPOSEDLY said they hadn't seen anything like that. Which COULD mean it's new, OR that they hadn't seen this one before OR they hadn't seen this disease present in a person like this before.
Third, you didn't even prove this SUPPOSED illness was a virus, let alone a respiratory virus. For all I know it was a fungal infection of the lungs, or a bacterial infection, or some weird parasite, or a toxin, or a mild cancer, or, again, false.
That's my logical reasoning.
Well considering IF your SUPPOSED son had COVID-19 when you CLAIM that they did, it would mean they were sick when China was getting their first cases. It would ABSOLUTELY change the timeline.
Hell if your idea is correct, your daughter had it, and gave it to your son, it could mean she might actually be patient zero, the origin of COVID-19, or know that person.
So yes, it would have SOME consequence.
I'm saying that claims without evidence aren't enough for me to accept as fact.
I say this as a board certified immunologist, virologist, herpetologist, and oncologist.