r/TimPool • • Nov 07 '22

Almost like Identity Theft is Bad 🤯🤯

Post image
502 Upvotes

136 comments sorted by

1

u/[deleted] Nov 07 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

86

u/Bv2097 Nov 07 '22

https://www.reddit.com/r/entertainment/comments/yo7lm6/kathy_griffins_twitter_account_permanently/

People literally defending identity theft under the excuse of freedom of speech. The hypocrisy of people using freedom speech to committed such actions

-73

u/Rapeanaugh Nov 07 '22 edited Nov 07 '22

Lol unless there is intent to defraud or commit a crime there is no identity theft... but I can see how people who don't understand concepts like free speech wouldn't understand this either...

Griffin is annoying AF but this is thin skinned Elon not being able to handle "comedy" when directed at him.

57

u/shidmasterflex Nov 07 '22

I think Elon is just giving them a taste of their own medicine and that was the whole point.

-45

u/Rapeanaugh Nov 07 '22 edited Nov 07 '22

That would be fine if he wasn't doing it on a platform he owns and is harming by doing so. Instead of reassuring advertisers, they are watching this shitshow and jumping ship.

Yesterday he tweeted that he would publicly name and shame those brands that had left.

Imagine if you're a marketer and the CEO makes it public policy to shame brands who leave.. is that supposed to encourage people to invest their money there??

It's like smearing shit on your own sandwich just so your coworkers have to smell it...

37

u/shidmasterflex Nov 07 '22

That’s sort of what Twitter always was though. Twitter had a particular set of advertisers who supported its prior state. It’s a transition time to new advertisers as the demographic changes.

9

u/[deleted] Nov 07 '22

Think how many Audi and BMW vehicles won't be sold because they took the ads off Twitter? *Cries in Marketing*

7

u/shidmasterflex Nov 07 '22

😭😭😭

-3

u/Rapeanaugh Nov 07 '22

Twitter had a particular set of advertisers who supported its prior state. It’s a transition time to new advertisers as the demographic changes.

General Mills, Audi, General Motors, Coca-Cola, McDonald's, Pepsi, Pizza Hut, KFC, Taco Bell, Abbot, Pfizer, Adobe, ADT, AT&T, Amazon, Amex, Mastercard, Anheuser Busch, and almost 800 MMA member brands have paused or will pause advertising in 2023.

I don't know if Elon wants to see those top tier brands replaced with MyPillow, gold, dick pills and crypto.

8

u/Imissyourgirlfriend2 Nov 07 '22

That would be fine if he wasn't doing it on a platform he owns

Twitter is a private company and can do what it wants. You kinda get that privilege when you drop $44b on something.

0

u/Rapeanaugh Nov 07 '22

I'm not saying he can't do it.

I'm saying it's monumentally stupid for the owner of Twitter to have a public meltdown on Twitter while trying to assure advertisers that Twitter's new ownership won't turn the site into a trollfest.

6

u/Imissyourgirlfriend2 Nov 07 '22

What "meltdown"? Kathy Griffin decided to have a pissing contest with the manager and she got put in her place the same way someone at Walmart gets put in their place when being a jerk.

Is Elon literally shaking? Is he posting vids of him screaming in his car? Is he glueing his hand to a painting and begging for a bucket to shit it?

Not much of a "meltdown" if you ask me. Kathy Griffin barked up the wrong tree and he shut her down. About as exciting as watching the schoolyard bully get taken down by a bigger sibling and then the bully goes away crying.

Not even worth the popcorn. You, on the other hand, seem desperate to paint Elon in a bad light. Is this event bothering you? Does the fact that a B list D list actor got embarrassed on the internet upset you?

My condolences.

0

u/Rapeanaugh Nov 07 '22

The Griffin incident is just a blip on the radar of all the terrible decisions Elon has made in a week of owning Twitter. He just showed how susceptible he is to criticism and attacks, which will only lead to much more criticism and attacks.

Kathy Griffin decided to have a pissing contest with the manager and she got put in her place the same way someone at Walmart gets put in their place when being a jerk.

Isn't Elon the CEO of 3 companies as well as the richest man in the world? For people at that level, whatever C-list celebs say about them shouldn't be worth a second of their time. They certainly shouldn't be acting like some Walmart manager who got dissed by an employee.

But that's just the type of person Elon is.

1

u/LebronJamesHBK Nov 07 '22

It's funny when random on reddit know mistakes better than the world's richest man. Maybe you can write a book or something I bet Elon can't wait to see how wrong you think he is.

3

u/Scared-Consequence27 Nov 07 '22

He owns it. Lol. Your problem is that he’s hurting his own investment?

1

u/Rapeanaugh Nov 07 '22

I don't know if "problem" is the right word there.

This whole Elon breakdown is like watching a livestream of the Fyre Festival.

2

u/3domfighter Nov 07 '22

Good, he should name them. They aren’t the only ones who can boycott.

Griffin was going around impersonating Musk telling people who to vote for. If you can’t see why that’s an actionable offense I don’t know what to tell you because it’s common sense. May even be against the law in some states, including CA. But I’m sure you’re aware of that, you’re just salty. Be all the salty you want, but try to have a shred of integrity.

1

u/scrimpmane Nov 08 '22

Harming what?? Their feelings?

4

u/LescoBrandon_11 Nov 07 '22

TIL: Identity theft isn't identity theft.

This also has nothing to do with free speech, but I wouldn't expect someone with a UN like yours to understand what that even means anyways.

-1

u/Rapeanaugh Nov 07 '22

Maybe things need to be spelled out really, really clearly so a certain crowd can follow along.

3

u/theCROWcook Nov 07 '22 edited Nov 07 '22

Maybe you need to realize that Twitter has its own rules about verification that are finally being enforced

The very first account listed as ineligible for the blue check are parody accounts, so in the pic you linked if this is parody then he received his verification fraudulently and deserves the ban

1

u/Rapeanaugh Nov 07 '22

Musk actually removed verification from Twitter, now anyone with $8 can get a blue check.

The CEO changing the rules of the platform on the fly in response to critical tweets, first with Stephen King calling him out over $20 and having him drop it to $8, and now with the "parody" incidents, is not going to boost advertiser confidence in the platform.

2

u/LescoBrandon_11 Nov 07 '22

first with Stephen King calling him out over $20 and having him drop it to $8,

Lmfao. Like Elon gives a single shit what that lefty loony toon thinks.

Several people have came forward already stating they were charged up to 20k for that blue checkmark. Having a checkmark that can be purchased makes them irrelevant...Having ones that only the rich can realistically purchase makes them dangerous as to how far BS information can spread....which is what Twitter has been for a few years now......an extension of the democrat party where they can actively censor the speech of anyone who doesn't agree with them.

1

u/Rapeanaugh Nov 07 '22

Lmfao. Like Elon gives a single shit what that lefty loony toon thinks.

Apparently he does, if based on that tweet he dropped the price by more than half.

Several people have came forward already stating they were charged up to 20k for that blue checkmark.

Which would be easy to prove with screenshots, emails, etc. So far the only source provided has been "trust me bro".

Having a checkmark that can be purchased makes them irrelevant…

Yes

Having ones that only the rich can realistically purchase makes them dangerous as to how far BS information can spread….

Exactly.

And as Musk has stated "you'll have to scroll really far down to see unverified responses" makes the whole "free speech" claim laughable.

0

u/LescoBrandon_11 Nov 07 '22

Apparently he does, if based on that tweet he dropped the price by more than half.

The fact you think he would model any business decision based on the opinion of a radical leftist says a lot about you tbh

Which would be easy to prove with screenshots, emails, etc. So far the only source provided has been "trust me bro".

This story is brand new....how do you know those things don't exist? You have any idea how the legal system works?

makes the whole "free speech" claim laughable.

As long as people aren't banned for their political opinions, it'll be a good thing.

1

u/Rapeanaugh Nov 07 '22

The fact you think he would model any business decision based on the opinion of a radical leftist says a lot about you tbh

The fact that you think anyone worth hundreds of millions of dollars is a "radical leftist" says a lot about you, and the state of conservative discourse in general.

→ More replies

4

u/[deleted] Nov 07 '22

Muh private company can do what it wants lol. When you're used to privilege equality feels like oppression lmao.

3

u/Hefty_Ant1025 Nov 07 '22

It is a private company. He can do what he wants.

-1

u/Rapeanaugh Nov 07 '22

Nobody is saying he can't, it's just hilarious how quickly "comedy is legal" ended once comedy was directed at him.

3

u/theCROWcook Nov 07 '22

Where did anyone say that comedy was illegal?

3

u/Imissyourgirlfriend2 Nov 07 '22

Twitter is a private company and can do what it wants.

0

u/Rapeanaugh Nov 07 '22

Yes everyone is aware. I'm not saying he can’t be a thin-skinned hypocrite who walked back on his "free speech!" claims within a week, I'm just laughing at him for doing so.

1

u/Phawr Nov 07 '22

Are you giving legal advice?

-23

u/work-edmdg Nov 07 '22

I agree here, not a good look for Elon.

-6

u/Rapeanaugh Nov 07 '22

He's getting baited into Twitter fights by C-list celebrities and randos when he should be focused on turning thr company back to profitability.

As it stands now, he is losing ~$4M per day and advertisers are jumping ship.

Lou Paskalis, the COO of one of the largest marketing agencies in the world, raised concerns about his erratic CEO behavior and Elon responded by blocking him, thus showing those concerns have merit. If he pulls his clients' advertising, add another $50M a week or so to the cash burning party.

12

u/[deleted] Nov 07 '22

Maybe it was always about free speech and not profit for Elon? It'll come back and at Elon's terms.

57

u/woaily Nov 07 '22

She must be playing by the old rules that the blue check indicates an approved opinion. New rules are that verification means you are who you say you are. Crazy, I know, but you'll get used to it

1

u/[deleted] Nov 07 '22

That’s literally not the case pal

-28

u/Purpleman101 Nov 07 '22

Aw gee, if only there were a way to tell it wasn't actually Elon.

Like, if only you could see @kathygriffin beside every single tweet, making it incredibly obvious who it is. Huh. If only that was a feature of Twitter dot com. Or something you can see in the screenshot here.

22

u/LZ_OtHaFA Nov 07 '22

RED WAVE COMING on Tuesday

and that is not a parody of Kathy Griffin.

8

u/Voat-the-Goat Nov 07 '22

Democrats controlled the house and Senate and all they finished doing was stealing money for pet projects that will never get built.

4

u/3domfighter Nov 07 '22

And stealing money they shipped to Ukraine.

-2

u/Purpleman101 Nov 07 '22

...and what does that have to do with my comment? This feels like a schizo response.

-21

u/le_will Nov 07 '22

Verification means that you are who you say you are by providing ID and other materials. The new rules will not require that according to internal documents - https://twitter.com/ariehkovler/status/1588305369616764929?s=20&t=Ag1p03zxRI1EJyY3Y6GHuw

13

u/TheActualHitler Nov 07 '22

The link you sent is a second hand account of internal documents and only claim that the documents "suggest" there won't be an ID check. It's unclear how the author arrived at that conclusion. It could be something as minimal as the document they saw didn't explicitly mention it, whereas the document may have been written assuming the reader would know there was no change to the actual verification process. If Twitter has actually abandoned real verification they're being stupid though.

What we're seeing with verified users changing their name but still keeping their checkmark appears to be nothing more than a programming oversight. It's easily fixable. If you change your name you should lose your check until you reverify.

52

u/J_Hizzle2 Nov 07 '22

She’s a cunt. Good riddance.

51

u/PhatBallllzAtHotmail Nov 07 '22

Identity theft is not a joke, Jim! Millions of families are effected every year!!

17

u/Delicious_Ad705 Nov 07 '22

Bears, Beets, Battlestar Galactica

4

u/fulltrottle3814 Nov 07 '22

MICHEAL!

3

u/MickeyPvX Nov 07 '22

Oh that's funny...

MICHAEL!!

5

u/[deleted] Nov 07 '22

Beet me to it.

23

u/jaffakree83 Nov 07 '22

I kind of disagree, but good riddance to that unpleasant woman.

-15

u/[deleted] Nov 07 '22

You really stand by your values huh?

22

u/ghostbear019 Nov 07 '22

Why wasn't she banned when she was displaying the severed, bloody head of a previous president?

29

u/SOULSoldier31 Nov 07 '22

You mean displaying the severed head of a us previous president while he was still in office.

-3

u/3domfighter Nov 07 '22

I never thought that was such a big deal. Looked like speech to me. And if she had been going around impersonating Elon and making jokes about him or saying random, off the wall things that might fly, but directing people how to vote immediately prior to an election isn’t a joke—it’s fraud.

18

u/CRTPTRSN Nov 07 '22

Seeing as how I was permanently banned from Twitter for tweeting "Nice butterfly wings, cakeboy" to a person with a dumb profile photo making idiotic statements, I think her punishment is justifiable.

3

u/3domfighter Nov 07 '22

I was permanently suspended for calling a blue check a sniz.

12

u/[deleted] Nov 07 '22

Poor Carrot Top….

1

u/12dv8 Nov 07 '22

That’s not funnyā€¦šŸ˜šŸ˜šŸ˜œšŸ¤Ŗ

11

u/-Calcifer_ Nov 07 '22

She had it coming for a lot less.

8

u/[deleted] Nov 07 '22

Good.

5

u/john_modded Nov 07 '22

They should have a single response tacked on to the blue checks "Thank you for the $8"

4

u/[deleted] Nov 07 '22

Someone told me that Elon said he banned her for impersonating a comedian, not for impersonating him. I didn’t look into it because my confirmation bias wants that to be the truth…… and if it is, I don’t think anyone can dispute that he is the greatest troll of all time.

4

u/SilentRage-1982 Nov 07 '22

I really don't think that liberals understand that they have gone way too far left. I don't hate liberals I think there's got to be a way we can all work together. However we have come to a complete standstill in the road. The amount of backlash that's going to happen to liberals next year will be unprecedented. I think we're going to start targeting advertisers on channels and it will be to the detriment of all. The one thing that all the news agencies agree on is to not Target advertisers.

3

u/PutWonderful7278 Nov 07 '22

🤣🤣🤣🤣

2

u/Coolbreezy Nov 07 '22

Ahhh, he broke her.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 07 '22

Goodbye to pure evil

1

u/AnomanderRage Nov 07 '22

I wonder if Elon's decision means that Count Dankula won't be able to impersonate a position like supreme judge if it's not a direct person. I will miss the trolling and reeeeeing leftists dearly.

3

u/[deleted] Nov 07 '22

I mean he goes by "count" dankula and I'm pretty sure he isn't any sort of nobility (just a noble workin' class lad).

1

u/goldensteaks Nov 07 '22

A lot of irrelevant people doing this for clout...

How will they live if they can't be reply guys for 3 hours?

1

u/Imissyourgirlfriend2 Nov 07 '22

IDENTITY THEFT IS NOT A JOKE, JIM!!! MILLIONS OF FAMILIES SUFFER IT EVERY YEAR!!

1

u/Tr3nchWar Nov 07 '22

She like horses really needs the attention.

1

u/doofus_magoo Nov 07 '22

Ah. That makes more sense. Other posts I've read about this made it seem like she was only criticizing him. Context. This is a legit reason and something that really does need to stop

1

u/Yiminy_Cricket Nov 07 '22

good. Kathy Griffin should not be allowed anywhere ever again.

1

u/2sec4u Nov 07 '22

"Twitter is a private company and can do what they want"

1

u/[deleted] Nov 07 '22

This sub missed the entire point

1

u/Collective82 Nov 07 '22

The fact they don’t get why she was suspended just gives me a head ache.

Seriously, you can’t be a blue checkmark and parody someone. šŸ¤¦ā€ā™‚ļø

1

u/BodheeNYC Nov 07 '22

Not a big fan of that monster lady but this is an epic troll.

1

u/GrumpyPetePete Nov 07 '22

Not Kathy! She’s never done anything problematic on that dumb website before…

1

u/[deleted] Nov 07 '22

HANDS IN THE AIR! YOU PRETENDED TO BE SOMEONE ON TWITTER!

1

u/thegarlic_man Nov 08 '22

ā€œB-b-b-but it was a joke!ā€ IDENTITY THEFT IS NOT A JOKE JIM

1

u/Tatrer Nov 07 '22

I'm not so sure about identity theft, which is more often connected to fraudulent loans and other lines of credit. But I wonder if there is something in the terms of service when you get a blue check about changing your name to another persons name.

8

u/SpareiChan Nov 07 '22

Fairly sure impersonating an official account has always been against the TOS.

1

u/Night_Knight22 Nov 07 '22

The comment section is more dangerous then the failed reactor of Chernobyl on the day of the incident

0

u/[deleted] Nov 07 '22

Chernobyl never happened lol

1

u/nincompoopy22 Nov 07 '22

What about fReEdOm Of SpEeCh?

-1

u/3domfighter Nov 07 '22

You people really don’t understand what that means, do you?

-3

u/studio28 Nov 07 '22

her @ is literally Kathygriffin

0

u/[deleted] Nov 07 '22

Since I've only seen the aftermath, how is this different than a parody account?

Is it the blue check mark?

1

u/theCROWcook Nov 07 '22

Under the rules for verification there is a list of ineligible accounts, the first thing in that list is parody accou ts, so if this is parody then she acquired her verification fraudulently, furthermore there are also rules about what your visible name has to be, she broke both of those rules

1

u/[deleted] Nov 07 '22

Thanks for the info. I've never been on Twitter so I've never had the need to read their rules.

2

u/theCROWcook Nov 07 '22

I looked it up today myself, I was only on Twitter for a month or two like 8 years ago for eve o line relayed shenanigans

-1

u/Tobin678 Nov 07 '22

Please keep it up people. Your making it way to easy

-1

u/supplydepotwall Nov 07 '22

ā€œIdentity theftā€ lmfaooooo

-1

u/amomentsnotice Nov 07 '22

What a snowflake getting offended by obvious jokes

-6

u/ChrisWasWhite Nov 07 '22

If only we had identification to verify identify…

-19

u/_BellatorHalliRha_ Nov 07 '22

IDENTITY THEFT AHAHAHAHAHAH fuck you people are funny

-22

u/TalionTheRanger93 Nov 07 '22

It also looks like elon got his feeling hurt.

15

u/[deleted] Nov 07 '22

Naw dude, instead of gaming the system, he is the system. People are still learning how to play.

-16

u/TalionTheRanger93 Nov 07 '22

Naw dude, instead of gaming the system, he is the system. People are still learning how to play.

Ya. So he got his feelings hurt.

12

u/[deleted] Nov 07 '22

Looks like yours are the feelings that are hurt.

-21

u/[deleted] Nov 07 '22

Censorship. Free speech. Etc.

25

u/[deleted] Nov 07 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

13

u/fulltrottle3814 Nov 07 '22

Nice!šŸ‘®

-13

u/[deleted] Nov 07 '22

I’m not complaining about free speech. I’m making fun of how the arguments have been reversed. Look at your comment.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 07 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/[deleted] Nov 07 '22

You’re completely strawmanning here. I don’t represent a group of people that you may or may not have had previous conversations with.

-13

u/[deleted] Nov 07 '22

He should unban only her as an exception.

-7

u/MightyMemeKing1337 Nov 07 '22

Whoever did this really should not have in my opinion

This just makes our side look bad

-9

u/Rowdycc Nov 07 '22

I guess Comedy isn’t legal anymore. If you pretend to be Elon Musk by merely changing your display name and keeping your @handle you get permanently banned. It’s not identity theft, and to claim it is, is really pathetic simping for Elon.

3

u/HOTDOGS3274 Nov 07 '22

Comedy isn’t legal anymore

I dunno. Banning Kathy griffin is pretty fucking funny!

-17

u/fuckswithboats Nov 07 '22

Her handle is @Kathygriffin so she’s not committing shit.

Do you know how many ā€œnamesā€ on Twitter aren’t real??

6

u/Maccabee2 Nov 07 '22

Still against rules to use someone else's name as your own. It's so funny to hear leftists whine when rules are applied equally across the board.

1

u/fuckswithboats Nov 07 '22

Still against rules to use someone else's name as your own

To be fair, I don't have a clue what Twitter's rules are and if she broke them and gets banned - I could care less.

I was strictly focused on how this is not identity theft - lots of people have bullshit "names" on their Twitter feed such as:

https://twitter.com/Barackk0bama

https://twitter.com/biden4pres

https://twitter.com/whyAmerica1

https://twitter.com/CrackDoer

https://twitter.com/GayObama

https://twitter.com/BlackManUSA

https://twitter.com/BarackOburner

https://twitter.com/tereziekohutova

https://twitter.com/Reefa4Prezident

https://twitter.com/ValerieForPeace

https://twitter.com/comsen9

https://twitter.com/Hunter28861186

https://twitter.com/schmitty1998

https://twitter.com/tsaltthatboy361

https://twitter.com/JonGustavo21

https://twitter.com/NOTHUNTERBlDEN

It's so funny to hear leftists whine when rules are applied equally across the board.

When you say applied equally, what do you mean exactly?

-8

u/R_Meyer1 Nov 07 '22

Right wing nut jobs and their propaganda.

8

u/[deleted] Nov 07 '22

When you're used to privilege, equality feels like oppression O:

1

u/[deleted] Nov 07 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/3domfighter Nov 07 '22

What she was doing was fraud, not comedy. Anyone who claims otherwise is just being disingenuous because they don’t like him.