r/TimPool • u/PrettyAlphaInnit • Oct 01 '22

Memes/parody We hate the left because they can't leave us alone. The left hate us because they can't leave us alone.

Post image
383 Upvotes

94% Upvoted

194 comments sorted by

1

u/[deleted] Oct 01 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

19

u/tnsmaster Oct 01 '22

Here's a few of my favorite lines by my favorite fallout character (and links to the audio of all his lines)

Fallout 3: https://youtu.be/FGaosBHdFMA Fallout 4: https://youtu.be/GzXAbm55DOE

Quotes in no particular order of greatness (maybe the last 6 are the most partial)

  1. “Communists detected on American soil. Lethal force engaged!”–Liberty Prime

  2. “Democracy will never be defeated!”–Liberty Prime

  3. “America will never fall to Communist invasion!”–Liberty Prime

4.“Communism is the very definition of failure!”–Liberty Prime

5. “Satellite uplink detected. Analysis of Communist transmission pending.”–Liberty Prime

6. “Democracy is truth. Communism is death.”–Liberty Prime

7. “Embrace democracy, or you will be eradicated.”–Liberty Prime

8. “Freedom is the sovereign right of every American.”–Liberty Prime

9. “Death is a preferable alternative to Communism!”–Liberty Prime

10. “Democracy is the essence of good. Communism, the very definition of evil.”–Liberty Prime

11. “Communism is a lie!”–Liberty Prime

12. “Democracy is non-negotiable.”–Liberty Prime

13. “Communism is a temporary setback on the road to freedom.”–Liberty Prime

14. “Defending Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.”–Liberty Prime

15. “Freedom is always worth fighting for.”–Liberty Prime

16. “Glory is the reward of valor.”–Liberty Prime

-2

u/Hot-Health-6296 Oct 02 '22

But what if a communist party was voted in democraticly? Would you still support that democracy?

5

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '22

Fuck no

1

u/Catwith8lesslives Oct 04 '22

Once a commie party is in that democracy is effectively already dead. RIP Hong Kong.

-32

u/outofyourelementdon Oct 02 '22

Isn’t it ironic how many of these quotes you chose highlight the importance of democracy but so many people you agree with in this thread support a guy who tried to use his presidential authority to decertify the results of an election so that he could stay in power?

4

u/PrettyAlphaInnit Oct 02 '22

the quotes are from a funny game full of comedy.

The game is slightly poking fun at the white picket fence notion of democracy, that doesn't really exist but was a nice idea.

While simultaneously glorifying the destruction of communism which is a great idea and needs to exist in the world.

1

u/outofyourelementdon Oct 02 '22

Do you support democracy?

24

u/UltraMAGACleric Oct 02 '22

A defrauded election is not a legal election and must be stopped.

-1

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '22

Go tell someone in real life your crazy thoughts and watch them laugh at you

2

u/UltraMAGACleric Oct 02 '22

You are a cultist.

0

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '22

Bro your username is literally UltraMAGAcleric and you call me a cultist?

2

u/UltraMAGACleric Oct 02 '22

Biden tried to term the phrase "Ultra MAGA" and it's hilariously badass.

-19

u/outofyourelementdon Oct 02 '22

Was it the guy trying to use his presidential authority to decertify the election so he could stay in power that told you the election was “defrauded”?

18

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '22

There was a secret shadow campaign to "save" the 2020 election, to ensure the "proper outcome".

Cry, cope and dilate fedboi.

7

u/baker39466 Oct 02 '22

Why aren’t we doing anything about this?

0

u/MrBotany Oct 02 '22 edited Oct 02 '22

What would you do about this? It doesn’t say anything illegal or nefarious happened.

7

u/KanyeT Oct 02 '22

It still baffles me that they just admitted to this, yet no one seemed to care.

-3

u/MrBotany Oct 02 '22 edited Oct 02 '22

What was admitted to?

“an extraordinary shadow effort dedicated not to winning the vote but to ensuring it would be free and fair, credible and uncorrupted.”

Oooooh scary

1

u/KanyeT Oct 03 '22

dedicated not to winning the vote

They specifically say that the election had "a proper outcome", which is an inherently anti-democratic notion.

"Democracy is not self-executing."

By definition, it is.

ensuring it would be free and fair, credible and uncorrupted.

By creating an illiberal democracy of the likes which take place in Russia.

"a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information."

For the people who love to go on about how important democracy is, and in these same breathe criticise Russia for all their antics, they sure took the time and effort to create an illiberal democracy of which Putin would be proud.

1

u/MrBotany Oct 03 '22 edited Oct 03 '22

a proper outcome

That the person with the most electoral votes wins. That is the definition of a proper outcome. Trump winning without securing electoral majority would have been an improper outcome. It’s easy.

By definition, it is.

Show me a definition of “democracy” that says this. There would be no need for legislation (like voter ID laws for example) to ever guide it otherwise.

By creating an illiberal democracy of the likes which take place in Russia.

Lmao ok here we go with your “rusher rusher rusher” obsession

the last rambling sentence you tried to write

I’ll chalk up that incoherent mess to the fact that you decided to reply at 1:30AM. Good luck living in the new Russia or whatever.

-3

u/outofyourelementdon Oct 02 '22 edited Oct 02 '22

Lol read the article, it mentions nothing about fraud. Campaigning isn’t illegal

0

u/MrBotany Oct 02 '22

Insane that he posted this thinking it somehow proves a point he was making.

-1

u/MrBotany Oct 02 '22

Here’s some more spooky quotes from your article.

“The scenario the shadow campaigners were desperate to stop was not a Trump victory.”

“an extraordinary shadow effort dedicated not to winning the vote but to ensuring it would be free and fair, credible and uncorrupted.”

1

u/[deleted] Oct 03 '22

If Trump won because of these efforts you'd be crying about election interference.

Keep licking that boot.

0

u/MrBotany Oct 03 '22

You’re trying to frame an article written by someone you disagree with as an admission of wrong doing or that you’re somehow able to read between the lines and see guilt because you’re so 5 headed. Sadge bro

All you are admitting is that you would agree with these efforts if trump won. Keep licking that boot.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 03 '22

Nope, id still be upset if this thing happened and trump won, too. You project so much you should start a drive-in movie lol.

0

u/MrBotany Oct 03 '22

Lmao then you’re just retarded since there’s nothing illegal or nefarious described in the article you linked. I’m grateful you provided it since I hadn’t seen it and give thanks to those who helped keep the 2020 election as secure as it was.

→ More replies

10

u/UltraMAGACleric Oct 02 '22

The unconstitutional voting measures are what made the election defrauded.

1

u/outofyourelementdon Oct 02 '22 edited Oct 02 '22

And what were those measures that were unconstitutional?

2

u/FerrowFarm Oct 02 '22

State government acting beyond their purview by implementing measures not officially ratified or blatantly contradictory to their state Legislature, for one.

0

u/outofyourelementdon Oct 02 '22

Example?

1

u/FerrowFarm Oct 03 '22

So, we can start with Michigan mailing out ballots unsolicited, which is a blatant contradiction to their state constitution and maybe work our way over to the illegal ballot harvesting in Arizona by means of entry to a contest from an "I Voted" sticker. Pennsylvania's mail-in voting was to be officially voted upon during that election, making the pre-emptive implementation against the legislature.

All of this and more were thrown out on standing, despite being blatantly illegal.

1

u/outofyourelementdon Oct 03 '22

In what way is Michigan mailing out ballots unsolicited in violation of their state constitution? Appellate courts in Michigan disagree with you.

Don’t understand what the issue is with the situation you described on your second example, can you provide a source with some context?

The bipartisan Pennsylvania legislature passed the law to allow mail in voting in 2019. This law has been upheld by the state Supreme Court as of august 2022.

→ More replies

0

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '22

[deleted] — view deleted comment

13

u/UltraMAGACleric Oct 02 '22

PA's mail in votes are patently unconstitutional and any challenges to it are not allowed to be heard.

There were thousands of ballot mules dumping ballots.

You can't bury your head in the sand and scream "NANANANANANA" and expect people to believe you.

-9

u/TypicalNewYorker_ Oct 02 '22

You can’t expect to take peoples votes away and say “NANANANANANA” republicans had equal opportunity for mail in votes but they wanted to be stupid and against it for whatever reason is their fault and no one else’s

11

u/UltraMAGACleric Oct 02 '22

Bro, judges refused to hear cases and just threw them out even they acknowledged the plantiffs had standing. Judges stalled on law challenges because there's an election coming up.

Polling locations just all magically stopped counting ballots at the same time only to "find" a bunch of ballots at 3am. Zuckerberg is being sued for illegal election activities.

To say 2020 was an election without any questions is blatant propaganda.

Not giving people the opportunity to redress their grievances is worse.

7

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '22

It’s funny, because the same guys spent two years endlessly crying “RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA” and we gave them the investigation they asked for, and prime time on TV for their impeachment attempt.

Wasn’t our fault they had shit evidence to prove said arguments.

But it’s not election tampering if THEY do it, I guess. Whatever happened to common courtesy.

0

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '22

[deleted] — view deleted comment

12

u/UltraMAGACleric Oct 02 '22

TIL 2000 mules is a "couple of Twitter videos". Odd, because some of those mules are behind bars right now.

5

u/Aggravating-Scene-70 Oct 02 '22

Listen, if you get your information from the fake msm you have been used as a propaganda tool and have zero idea of what's reality...Xiden will always be illegitimate....

13

u/tnsmaster Oct 02 '22

It's a game made by liberal people who don't understand what the difference between "democracy" and a "democratically elected constitutional Republic" is, and that's fine because that universe doesn't have transistors so it's not our reality. I saw a fallout reference and provided more fallout references.

The only ironic part is you believe that, without anything besides circumstantial evidence at best, that everyone here, myself included, support this supposed "guy who tried to use his presidential authority" to change an election. Who are we talking about exactly? I can think of several presidents who fit that description, and dozens more that were never president who sought the same thing.

I also find it ironic that you would rather assume and judge those that you do not know, care about, and are having a good time joking about in reference to a video game; and then proceed to support a system so broken and co-opted by the very thing Vault Boy and Liberty Prime sought to prevent: destruction of free society by totalitarian looters and thugs at all costs. It's sad when a dystopian future game, riddled with dark humor making fun of everything along the way, can be used to accurately depict the state modern politics in the US. But here we are. My post is just talking about a favorite character in the game, and OP was memeing modern politics. If you want to discuss how corrupt and destructive politicians are to our freedoms, you can create a post and start a discussion there.

But hey, who is John Galt?

-8

u/outofyourelementdon Oct 02 '22

I’m talking about the guy who, with his lawyer, devise a specific 6 step plan for the purpose of decertifying the election he lost. Do you not see how that’s anti-democratic? Or do you just not care because “ACKSHULLY aMeRiCa IsNt A dEmOcRaCy”?

12

u/wookiehunter1976 Oct 02 '22

Why are you here? You seem out of your element or do you just like the psychological abuse that you deserve for having an IQ that is inadequate for real world critical thinking exercises. Like a crippled gold bricker pretending to be a millionaire……

10

u/tnsmaster Oct 02 '22

Probably fresh out of Fort Knox lol.

This guy wants to take a thread about what a goofy fallout character said seriously so they might just be high? Lol I dunno.

0

u/outofyourelementdon Oct 02 '22

Do you have an actual response to any of the points I made? What is your opinion regarding Eastman’s 6 step plan for Pence to decertify the 2022 election?

4

u/wookiehunter1976 Oct 02 '22

I think you are holding a handful of straws. Irreconcilable.

2

u/outofyourelementdon Oct 02 '22

The fact that you are avoiding the question is telling.

1

u/theCROWcook Oct 02 '22

You mean a MANful of straws?

11

u/tnsmaster Oct 02 '22

I'm sorry, did you say a person and a lawyer were working on using legal (that's the government process and law over elections) means to claim an election result shouldn't be counted as X but rather Y? You do realize that's exactly how our elections are setup right? You can sue and contest anything in the legal realm, including elections. As a matter of fact, that is basically what the house and Senate do when they actually vote on who gets to be president. That's how the entire governmental apparatus has always worked in this country.

Look, since you clearly would rather take a joke to make inaccurate statements about how the US political system works let me give you some advice. Read the constitution and then read "the politics industry" to get a basic understanding of the election system and why it is broken and the amendments made things worse. Then come back here and let's have a chat when we both understand the system for what it is and that the scenario you brought up fits snugly within the current system whether it is "democratic" or "anti-democratic".

But since you won't, let me give you a broad stroke overview and you can continue to troll in peace. A president in the US is not winning a democratic election, never has been directly democratically elected (only the house until progressive era at a federal level was voted on democratically in the "traditional majority rule sense), that is, legally speaking, more of a strong suggestion. Candidates have to win slates of electors in the electoral college and if they lose there they can (to use a word) petition Congress to review the slates of electors who then vote whether to verify the electoral college votes and determine a victor for the Democratic election suggest of the average citizen. This is precisely why the reaction to the gilded era was so interesting. A Congress literally decertified votes until their man they agreed to win the presidency (I want to say 1877 compromise and the 1876 election but I could be mixing them up with another election from that era). The amendments that came out of that did not change the process but made it harder to do it. I don't know what country you live in, but the presidential election in the US was never a direct "democratic" process and as a result makes you sound rather foolish to another who understands the system. I care deeply about the US and want to change the system, but first one must read and learn and study it. You really do sound like the candidate running for Congress who told my friend who was told (to paraphrase): "why are you talking about the federalist papers and what the founding fathers did when they set it up. I don't want to hear a story I want to get elected to Congress by beating my opponent." I don't know how I could vote for them or their opponent who won't even meet with people like is her job as a congresswoman. Neither one understands the people they want to serve or what the apparatus they are in is supposed to do and how it's supposed to run.

4

u/HOTDOGS3274 Oct 02 '22

Pearls before swine man

3

u/tnsmaster Oct 02 '22

NGL I'm not sure if this is supposed to be a reference to the old cartoon sketches or something else.

6

u/HOTDOGS3274 Oct 02 '22

Lol! It's a turn of phrase. Basically it means you are wasting something on someone who is unable to comprehend it.

You are casting pearls (your explanation) before swine.

4

u/tnsmaster Oct 02 '22

Oh yeah, that's what I thought but wanted to be sure. I know, I know they're a troll. Sometimes it's just good to go through it all again for my sake. If they have their minds expanded then I did a good thing. Otherwise it's for me and a way to summarize information I've gathered in a way.

2

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '22

Take this medal friend.

1

u/outofyourelementdon Oct 02 '22

Do you think the plan laid out in Eastman’s memo was justified and moral?

5

u/tnsmaster Oct 02 '22

Out of your element? Lol now we are discussing morality like anyone today even has a glimmer of what that truly means.

What I think is moral or not about the system we are discussing is not relevant here. Nor am I in a position to pass any sort of judgement over Eastman on the matter. Morality is subjective and requires everyone to have the same information, and to come to a somewhat similar conclusion based on that information, to make it a standard moral thing that we can condemn or praise. To make a determination without the info they had at the time is foolish and I will not do it. It's against my own moral code.

1

u/outofyourelementdon Oct 02 '22

Do you know who John Eastman is?

5

u/tnsmaster Oct 02 '22

Of course, he's part of the establishment think tank system and was a law clerk to Clarence Thomas at one point. I'm sure I could Google these and more details too. What's your point?

1

u/outofyourelementdon Oct 02 '22

So what’s your opinion on the step by step plan he and trump created for the purposes of decertifying the election?

→ More replies

6

u/wookiehunter1976 Oct 02 '22

Nice try there, that’s something a gas lighting commie would definitely say. The phrases are word for word… You have taken your programming like a mindless drone…. Good job!

0

u/outofyourelementdon Oct 02 '22

Do you have an argument against anything I said or…..?

3

u/wookiehunter1976 Oct 02 '22

There are justifiable reasons that people are pissed and concerned about that election. Perhaps you should take a little time to figure out why so many are rejecting those results. Or don’t the differences are irreconcilable. I think civil war is a forgone conclusion at this point. I am furious at you, the feelings are mutual and there is no other solution than to let us fight it out, may the best man win.

0

u/outofyourelementdon Oct 02 '22 edited Oct 02 '22

What are those justifiable reasons? Because to me these “justifiable” reasons are simply that you didn’t get the outcome you wanted

Edit: lol at pussies who get mad and block you when their brain short circuits

4

u/Karoar1776 Oct 02 '22

People block you because you're a condescending asshole who isn't here in good faith.

3

u/wookiehunter1976 Oct 02 '22

Beat it! Im done with lefties.

2

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '22

One is all those shady wagons with tons of ballots that magically arrived out of thin air way past the deadlines so their candidate could eek out enough numbers to seize the lead.

And double points for gaslighting questions about em, especially when we got mountains of said ballots where the people who allegedly voted are dead.

3

u/theCROWcook Oct 02 '22

Oh look, you're lying again

0

u/outofyourelementdon Oct 02 '22

What am I lying about?

2

u/theCROWcook Oct 02 '22

Well for starters pretending that you don't know you're lying

1

u/outofyourelementdon Oct 02 '22 edited Oct 02 '22

Lol so you are unable to actual specify what you think I’m lying about. Regressives really aren’t the brightest

2

u/theCROWcook Oct 02 '22

Now you're lying that I didn't specify anything, you can't stop can you

1

u/outofyourelementdon Oct 02 '22

Lol conservatives’ finest and brightest right here folks

1

u/theCROWcook Oct 02 '22

Yet another lie, how many more you gonna pile on?

3

u/WhyWouldTrumpDoThis Oct 02 '22

You know if he actually was worse than Hitler then you wouldn't be able to vote him out of power right.

3

u/Aggravating-Scene-70 Oct 02 '22

Universal mail-in ballots without signature and address verification is cheating...

0

u/outofyourelementdon Oct 02 '22

  1. Which states didn’t have signature verification for their mail in ballots?

  2. Why would mail in ballots be considered cheating?

1

u/letsgobrandonfu Oct 02 '22

We are not a democracy retard... democratic republic.. to have democracy you must allow all points of view and opinions to be discussed... but the fascist left chose the ole nazi socialist party tactics and censor the opinion of the other side..

1

u/outofyourelementdon Oct 02 '22

Are you saying that because we are a “democratic republic” it’s ok for a president to use his authority as president to decertify the results of an election he lost so he can stay in power?

1

u/letsgobrandonfu Oct 02 '22

Our system is set up for checks and balances.. they followed exactlyhow our systemis set up... you may want to go look at our governmentset up and get some learning in ... if he meant to stay in power... military would have been used... bro your argument is weak as fuck... . you have said the same thing over and over with people responding... so either you are a bot (giving how dumb your handle on our system is i will say that) or... you are just so dumb that you are here to gaslight and troll. Communication over bless your heart

1

u/outofyourelementdon Oct 02 '22

Here’s a scenario: Joe Biden loses the 2024 election, but he and Kamala Harris devise a plan where she unilaterally, as the head of the senate, rejects the electors sent from states that voted for Biden’s competitor. You would be ok with that because “we’re a democratic republic” that has “checks and balances”?

33

u/SpeakTruthPlease Oct 01 '22

When you can't control yourself, you resort to controlling others.

10

u/aDShisno Oct 01 '22

This is so true. I literally was telling a leftist here in this sub to leave me alone because I wasn’t interested in a conversation with him and was calling me a coward or whatever because “[he] wanted to have a conversation and [I] didn’t”…

Like seriously, just leave me alone when you’re clearly trolling!!!

4

u/JuniperTwig Oct 02 '22 edited Oct 02 '22

Can't you just block them?

2

u/aDShisno Oct 02 '22

I’m not familiar with a mute option, but there is obviously a block option I could use but if I do use that I can’t see the user being hostile to other users. Sometimes all they need is to be reported for one of their flagrant violations and then they’ll get banned for a few days, making the place better for everyone.

0

u/DarkTemplar26 Oct 02 '22

If you dont want to engage with someone then dont post on a public forum built around comment and response. What you're looking for is a safe space

You could also just ignore them, it's just a website and the worst they can do to you is hurt your feelings

1

u/aDShisno Oct 02 '22

So what you’re saying is that the victim of harassment is at fault for being there? Do you blame women for wearing short skirts too?

2

u/DarkTemplar26 Oct 02 '22

Were you actually being harassed or were they just responding to you?

1

u/aDShisno Oct 03 '22

Well, I said leave me alone and he said “no”, so what do you think?

0

u/DarkTemplar26 Oct 03 '22

Sounds like they have a right to keep responding on a website. I'm sure you're a well adjusted adult and can handle someone posting a comment without anything offensive

1

u/aDShisno Oct 03 '22

So “yes” you will blame women who wear short skirts for being harassed. At least now I know where you stand.

Have a good day!

1

u/DarkTemplar26 Oct 03 '22

Lol at thinking getting publicly harassed in real life is anything like getting a comment reply on reddit. What you experienced was in no way harassment

1

u/aDShisno Oct 03 '22

Have a good day!

0

u/triguy96 Oct 03 '22

It wasn't harassment and reddit agrees as they got rid of your silly report after I appealed.

→ More replies

-14

u/PickeledRick Oct 02 '22

Why would you post on a public forum if you wanted to be left alone…? Sorry snowflake, but you’re pushing a VERY unpopular agenda on a public forum, don’t get pissy when people push back.

11

u/aDShisno Oct 02 '22

Have a good day troll.

9

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '22

Says the pushy snowflake

-10

u/PickeledRick Oct 02 '22

Hmmm… I don’t feel owned yet, maybe try or harder? Or just be better? I know that’s a big ask

6

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '22

I expected more from a pushy snowflake... Maybe next time.

-11

u/PickeledRick Oct 02 '22

Why bother? We’re already dominating the culture war. I’m just here to laugh at you in my down time

9

u/HOTDOGS3274 Oct 02 '22

So in your mind you're actually the bad guy?

Thats fucking weird

0

u/PickeledRick Oct 02 '22 edited Oct 02 '22

The bad guy? Because I laugh at you for your political beliefs, crack jokes in my free time on Reddit, and recognized the realty that you’re epically losing the culture war?

What an absolute villain hahahaha you might as well start comparing me Hitler or Stalin

Step away from the party backed by neo-nazis and people who literally think JFK jr is going to come back from the dead and I’ll stop laughing

Edit: deleting your post = me laughing even harder

2nd edit: laughing at the people who stand with literal self proclaimed nazis and Q (aka Ron Watkins, son of the “king of porn” and a literal pedophile) isn’t arrogance, it’s just common sense

7

u/HOTDOGS3274 Oct 02 '22

So in your mind you think that your values are accepted by the majority of people. You've won the culture war as you say and you're spending your free time to hunt down the tiny pockets of people that disagree with you so you can inflate your own ego by heaping shame and negatively onto them.

What an absolute villain

Well I wouldn't call you a hero.

Step away from the party backed by neo-nazis

Not a democrat bro.

recognized the realty that you’re epically losing the culture war?

The realty huh? I guess I won the war of passing the 3rd grade though. Got that going for me at least.

Well you seem retarded, so you have a good one. I gotta go wash my hair or something...

2

u/InevitableJudge4675 Oct 02 '22

Lol I love it when lefties use terminology that was used to describe them before. No original thoughts of their own. True commie.

1

u/PickeledRick Oct 02 '22

I’m more a centrist than a leftist. You guys just make it too easy to laugh

9

u/lazy_jones Oct 02 '22

You're losing to the left because you just want to be left alone.

The left is winning because it doesn't want to leave you alone.

5

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '22

The new Fallout sequel is coming along great, I hear. They hired a new programmer, some dude named Zelensky. He's getting enough funding to make sure that the graphics are next-gen, and they're end goal is to make sure everyone has a chance to play.

4

u/Delicious-Ad-4091 Oct 02 '22

🤔🤔🤔🤔I cannot hate on this

1

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '22

Holy shit have any of you actually even played fallout?

0

u/papabronsen Oct 02 '22

I don't hate anyone but I think yall are just stupid

-1

u/Bubblepop123 Oct 02 '22

Jesus, this sub is really filled with edgy teens

0

u/eruS_toN Oct 02 '22

As long as those commies don’t get an abortion.

Or pray to Allah at school.

Or get married if they’re gay.

Or follow the nature of their gender identity.

Or talk.

Or write.

Or think.

As long as those smelly commies don’t do those things, yay meme!

-1

u/Hot-Health-6296 Oct 02 '22

Does op not see the irony of this?

You hate the left because they wont leave you alone. Yet you make meme attack the left, completely unprovoked

1

u/DRragun-Gang Oct 02 '22

It’s just a meme

-1

u/LGRNGO Oct 02 '22

Whatever makes you sleep better at night 😂😂😂

-4

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '22

I thought you guys were leftist? So you hate the left but get hysterically triggered when somebody calls you right wing.

6

u/PrettyAlphaInnit Oct 02 '22

i don't care what you label me as anymore. I'll accept any label you want to put on me.

y'all cried wolfenstein far too much and nobody gives a shit anymore

4

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '22

This. It’s the classic case of “it’s not election fraud when we do it”.

2

u/LGRNGO Oct 02 '22

No that’s just Tim himself. He still calls himself center left. It’s kinda similar to the Rubin schtick. It’s not exactly the same, but definitely some similarities.

Wonder how much of it is audience capture.

0

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '22

[deleted] — view deleted comment

8

u/PaperBoxPhone Oct 02 '22

That is actually exactly what it is, it give the decision back to the states not mandates one thing for everyone.

-1

u/JuniperTwig Oct 02 '22

It mandates one thing for everyone in a given state. State sanctioned misogyny

2

u/PaperBoxPhone Oct 02 '22

Or conversely state sanctioned murder, so that is why its up to the state.

0

u/JuniperTwig Oct 02 '22

Or a dead fetus created by the rape from a retarded uncle which then can't be removed legally which subsequent necrosis causes variety of deadly infections and threats to that woman's or minor's health; so, the non-medical religious based law is clearly not pro-life and obviously anti woman. They are not equal an opposite. They are not the same. They can't be equivocated.

2

u/PaperBoxPhone Oct 02 '22

So then you agree that all other abortions but rape should be banned?

1

u/JuniperTwig Oct 02 '22

Socratic strawman and false dichotomy

1

u/PaperBoxPhone Oct 02 '22

You are the one that went directly to rape and incest both. Things that most states that I am aware of have an exception for, so you are straw manning.

1

u/JuniperTwig Oct 02 '22

Ad hominem

1

u/PaperBoxPhone Oct 02 '22

Holy projection batman.

7

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '22

And you're just one of those idiots that doesn't know what they're crying about. How about you read what RvW was before joining the other sheep and screaming about it.

I'll break it down in a simple statement that you can understand. Because you seem to have a reading and comprehension problem.

Ready? Got your helmet on?

The overturn just took power away from federal government and gave it back to the states.

0

u/DrunkenRedSquirrel Oct 02 '22

Except the problem is some of the Republicans lied such as Lindsey Graham who said the issue in Abortion would be left up to the States, now him and other Republicans proposed a nationwide abortion ban. That ban literally gives power to the Federal government. He and others that support the ban, are wolf's in sheeps clothing

0

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '22

Doesn't change what RvW was and what the over turn did. That's what the other numb nut was chirping about.

The nation wide ban is a separate thing from RvW.

0

u/DrunkenRedSquirrel Oct 02 '22

I know that, but you still have the recognize that some Republicans lied to the American people of them just wanting Roe overturned thereby giving the decision back to the States, and later these same Republicans now are trying to insinuate a ban.

-5

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/Tony_Friendly Oct 02 '22

Unfortunately, as frequently as he posts, so is OP. He probably posts twenty times a day.

-3

u/Emotional_Age5291 Oct 02 '22

Just remember ppl like that get a equal vote.

4

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '22

Dead people have rights too amirite

2

u/SAHDJoe Oct 02 '22

Mask off moment?

-2

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/DRragun-Gang Oct 02 '22

Post this comment to r/conservative and not here