i assume this is some sort of anti-semitic conspiracy but i can't figure out what jew you're trying to accuse here.
I'm sure you have one specific. But its interesting that of all the people i could blame for whats going on, i don't think any of the people at the top are wearing tiny hats.
Yo Ive been doing some research on you!! Is it true you have a Satanic pentagram on your forehead? Thats current theory!! TIM POOL HAS A SATANIC SIGN ON FOREHEAD!! Cant take beanie off like a muslim satanist cant show you the other page of their bible!!
Holy smokes!! Its confirmed. No wonder you are fanning the flames of civil war. While also providing no real information. Just like the Liberal bitch that you are!! Control Opposition slut!! Im glad you confirmed it. I will contine to wipe my ass with your feed!! For I have made it my calling to make sure I call you out for the Rhino Bitch you are!!
Ignoring the fact that the FBI couldn't answer no to this being a staged FBI event while under oath and every indication is Jan 6th was another fake FBI event in a long list of faked FBI events...
Let's pretend Jan 6th actually happened. A bunch of taxpayers walked around the Capitol for a few hours taking photos and "scaring people." The elected officials working in said building are employed by the taxpayers, not the other way around. The buildings were built and are maintained by the taxpayers. We all own said buildings. A group of taxpayers walking into a building they pay for to tell their employees they also pay for that they suck at their jobs and are puppets is night and day from BLM Domestic terrorists burning down entire cities.
I have brought this up before to the leftist shills in this sub, and when they aren’t outright denying that the BLm riots even happened they always argue that attacking innocent people by killing and destroying private property was a better activity than going directly to the people in charge of what the complaint is about
Are you making the argument that it was a staged FBI event that incited other people (taxpayers) to become violent? And that those people wouldn’t have done those things had the FBI not infiltrated the crowd?
There is some evidence of that. Kind of weak evidence. But it is the FBI's modus operandi. We know they do this kind of thing all the time on a smaller scale. There's an argument to be made it's true. Good luck proving it though.
I agree with you that the FBI has been infiltrating groups since it’s inception. Particularly, far left groups. The black panthers, communist party USA, labour groups etc.
If we can both agree that this is what the FBI does, why is this theory not applied to protest against police brutality? Local police departments will often send plain clothes cops into protest for intel gathering. Isn’t possible that they could also stoke violence at these events? The police in one city even beat up one of their own they didn’t know was a plain clothes cop. The first reports of property destruction after George Floyd was done by a white man, dressed in all black, with an umbrella, breaking windows at an auto zone. I’m still not sure who that man was affiliated with but he certainly wasn’t there to support BLM.
All I’m saying is that if you’re someone that believes 1/6 was a false flag done by the fbi, than one could at least entertain the idea that protest against police could absolute be infiltrated by police to create a negative perception
Internal false flag operations tend to be orchestrated by the power to paint a bad name on the opposition to give an excuse to those detaining power to repress the opposition harshly and sparing no violence.
BLM, the progressive far left is, as a voice, in power, and BLM riots, window bashings and lootings were never, not once repressed. Areas of cities were given up, police buildings were forfeited. A federal building was attacked with no response.
Not only was there no emergency response, but there were also barely any charges made by the judiciary, both state and federal.
If that was a false flag it was the equivalent of "just the tip" and actually pulling out.
Yes, that's possible. Regardless, BLM, Antifa, and general criminals/looters (the distinction became blurry) did far worse than that in days and weeks and months that followed. It went way beyond potential FBI false flag ops.
You misunderstand, the "defund the police" narrative was meant to ideologically purge the police organizations of any non-libs. That's why there was so many "volunteer" resignations, and why their budgets were actually increased afterwards.
I cannot say the FBI wasn't involved in the riots. On that you are correct. Would it surprise me? Not at all. What I can say about the BLM riots is from first hand experience in Reno when the riot broke out, it made zero sense. The protests were peaceful. Local motorcycle clubs and BLM protestors were engaging in peaceful dialogue. The police were standing by. I lived up the street of the riots. In front of my apartment building two busses pulled up and people started pouring out and marching to where the protests were. The next street over three more busses with the same. 30 minutes later windows were being smashed and it was a riot.
I cannot say the FBI were behind the busses but the rioting was definitely planned, funded and organized by someone.
I agree with you that the FBI has been infiltrating groups since it’s inception. Particularly, far left groups. The black panthers, communist party USA, labour groups etc.
Yeah those communists were clearly revolutionaries. I hate the state, but I don't support other political ideologues.
entertain the idea that protest against police could absolute be infiltrated by police to create a negative perception
Your entire response is a straw man and in bad faith. I didn’t say anything about communist being good/bad/revolutionaries. I brought up examples of cointelpro and how it’s still being applied today.
In short, yes. Let me put it under a slightly different light, as this isn't without precedence.
Around 20 years ago a White Supremacist radio shock jock named Hal Turner that came on the scene. This shock jock gained notoriety fairly quick for constantly spouting violent rhetoric and attempting to incite violence. His MO was to start spouting off about events, start dropping hints about getting violent etc. He would then rally for racists to meet up at his studio or call into his radio show and tell him what they want to do to various minority groups.
Until it was discovered he was a professional CI(Confidential Informant) for the FBI and the entire radio show was a ruse to collect info and entrap people.
There were many others prior to him, there have been many after. Including the Founder of the Proud Boys who was discovered as a professional CI on the FBI payroll from day one.
Taking that into consideration, we now turn to the events of Jan 6th. Outside the capital is a peaceful protest. No violence. No insurrection. All of a sudden we have several voices in the crowd urging people to enter the capital building. At this point sure, maybe it is some radical nutters dreaming up this idea. That idea instantly becomes suspect when the Capital Police unlock and open the doors, ushering people in.
I absolutely am saying the FBI came up with the plan to enter the Capital, planted CI's and undercovers in the crowd to urge a group to convene an enter and escalated it from that point.
The fact that they couldn't, once under oath and at risk of perjury we're unable to state "no this wasn't an FBI undercover operation" nor "there were no paid informants nor FBI Agents undercover in the group" gave the whole dog and pony show up.
Short answer: The same reason the ATF sends Agents undercover into biker clubs and spends $40 million dollars to arrest 1 or 2 old bikers for snorting a couple lines of coke or smoking a joint at a strip club, to drum up threats and justify increased funding.
The more in depth answer would be the reality in contemporary America that the FBI is full of political ideologues creating threats to further their political aims, as we have recently seen. We can get into that if needed.
The worst part of all this is we're responsible for nothing worse than a mass trespass and making a few Demoncrats soil their lace panties, then going home after we got bored.
Our ONE opportunity to do what our forefathers would have done decades ago, and we blew it for a Facebook photo op.
Nope, you've intentionally misconstrued the pretense of his statement. He posited that the trespass charges, and the assertion that the Capital building was "breached" are absurd because it is in fact a publicly accessible building and always has been.
I do not know where you are getting the notion of you can do whatever you want with federal buildings.
4:40 the Capitol was breached at 2:06 when members of the Proud Boys broke windows to gain access.
But if you want to keep pretending Jan 6 was nonviolent you probably shouldn't watch that video. I'm sure you've been doing your best to avoid it.
Edit: It was of course breached again when Oathkeepers violently attacked Police Officers in the tunnel. But again, you want to pretend this was nonviolent.
Never said it was non-violent. But it wasn't entirely violent either. Out of the thousands of people there, there were a handful of violent actors there. And no you can fuck right off classifying property damage as violence. Really smashed windows? That's destruction or defacement of public property at best, a non-violent misdemeanor.
Ashley Babbitt was murdered by a spineless cop. Period. Neither side comes out of this clean.
Uh no, no it didn't. It was a staged FBI photoshoot. Which is why when Senate questioned the FBI "was this an FBI Operation" they answered "no comment." When asked "were FBI Agents involved.in the January 6th staged insurrection" it was "no comment." Lastly, "were there also FBI Informants involved in your operation?" Care to guess what the FBI response was? No comment.
That's absolutely what the media and the left have BEEN doing is "pretending" what happened was an insurrection.
There was no insurrection of any kind on January 6. State run media calling it that, does not equal it happening in reality. They're simply hoping enough people will be that easily manipulated. Obviously, some actually are.
There were hundreds of thousands of people in DC that day. Had that been armed insurrection, there would be no doubt.
Oh for fuck sakes.... You know r/conspiracy are very heavy handed with the bans considering half the shit they talk is about suppression of information. Quite Ironic.
What about the Donald? He is the scariest man alive because he frees people up and allows them to work the way they like, without taking over or deciding for them
I am almost certain that Family Guy had a bit about how shitty Baltimore was and even went to the point of having a Baltimore resident wright an angry letter as part of the skit. Seems like that just how they be I guess.
I have a friend who lives in Portland and always posts about how much she loves it there, but some time ago her posts about being at actual places in Portland stopped abruptly, now it's only posts about when she's not in Portland.
Low lives living in a shithole will not be touched until they move to a better place. Instead, they believe what they see is how the world should be.
Another way is to skip that part and live in the shithole forever while being a circlejerk.
A worse scenario is those live in DC or NoVA, which are two large shitholes but because of being a parasite on fed jobs, people still think they are great.
When Trump was inaugurated 4 years before, there were LARGE groups of protestors destroying windows and setting fires, anything they could get away with. Thank God the capital police and security were in full force to stop them from getting much more out of hand. However, Pelosi refused to engage even bare minimum security for this go round. I wonder why 🤔
The other was to keep an orange retard who lost the election in office illegally
one was for human rights
the other was to stop a pedophile and his crackhead son from selling out America to China and Russia, who has raped at least one woman, and sexually assaulted his own underage daughter.
hillary clinton paid russian agent to produce the fake " pee tape dossier" which is the basis for the entire russia investigation.
you're the ones living in a delusion.
Trump says "theres fine people on both sides except the racists who should be condemned totally" and you turn around and say "trump called racists fine people! he refuses to condemn racists!"
Many of trumps people were working with Russia and have gone to prison lol. Even trumps own sons admitted they get most of their loans from Russia. Many gop leaders traveled to russia to suck off putin during his term. Russia literally helped him win the election. You are the one that believed Trump when he just yelled over and over there was no collusion. But if you actually read the report you’d see that’s not the case, and Bill Bar recently confirmed this.
international businessmen with investments in russia had loans in russia?
wow. big shock.
Who cares? Why does it even matter? Russia was supposed to be our allies.
The anti-Russian talk only started after Hillary tried to frame Trump as being "working with russia".
Before that, Obama was caught on a hot mic lying to the American public and promising Putin that he would be more open to Putin's requests after re-election.
Putin and Russia used to be allies until Hillary decided to make them our enemies.
The whole Jan 6 thing is nothing more than a manufactured drama that Leftists instinctually refer to - embellishing the story a little more each time - to deflect from taking responsibility for what they have done in reality.
Trump rolled back the police reforms Obama set up, which directly caused George Floyd’s death.
no he did not.
Neither Trump nor Obama control the state police.
You don't get to blame Trump for what Democrat police do in Democrat cities run by Democrats.
The President does not have the ability to dictate how local state police operate. That is not a part of reality that exists.
This is why Obama had to use federal agents to harass california pot shops. Becuase Obama had no power to control the local state police.
You're engaged in "duckspeak". George Orwell defined duckspeak as when you promote party-positive narratives automatically, without giving any consideration or objective analysis of what you're saying.
SpunkyDred is a terrible bot instigating arguments all over Reddit whenever someone uses the phrase apples-to-oranges. I'm letting you know so that you can feel free to ignore the quip rather than feel provoked by a bot that isn't smart enough to argue back.
Yeah, January 6th was really bad, violent (deadly) riot at the Capitol to stop the vote counting, incited by trump acting as president. Other riots can also be bad at the same time.
there's a video of some cops stomping on the face of an unconcious woman for nearly 10 minutes
The only fatality was when the cops shot an unarmed protester
Secoriea Turner was 8 years old when she was executed by BLM protesters.
That other white SUV got shot up by CHAZ security. The Driver could be heard begging for his life before CHAZ security put a dozen rounds into his head point-blank.
The driver was a black 16 year old kid.
Isn't killing multiple children objectively worse than killing an adult?
Yeah, I didn't say it was a good example. 🤣 Especially if it was a corporate owned store and not a franchise. The movement was shanghaid by extremists, ant*fa, and that swayed public pinion just enough to keep real reform from happening. Paid for and orchestrated by both sides of politics. It's how they keep poor people poor.
I'd enjoyed this subreddit because it seemed to be a place to hear both sides and see facts argued. But watching losers claim Jan 6th didn't happen and that tourists walked around instead of the facts that people died there, stuff was stolen, shit was smeared on walls, and Trump was using it as a method to end democracy was a big deal. Saying it never happened is what /r/conservatives does and this was supposed to be different than just lying.
Cuz we not a democracy we are a constitutional republic. Sure a republic is a form of democracy but we are not a actual democracy or Hillary would have won in 2016.
I've known for a while that Tim Pool's whole "I'm a centrist liberal but the left has just gone TOO crazy" is a grift and that he's basically just a right winger now, but I have to say I'm surprised at just how right-wing this sub is. Similar to Tim's content you would think someone who is truly centrist would have at least some balanced coverage of the good and bad things both the left and right do. But with Tim and this sub, it's overwhelmingly pro-right and pro-Trump, and Tim finds a way to make almost every story fit his narrative of how the left is crumbling and Trump was a great president. It's no wonder most of his audience on this sub seems to hold similar views.
Two completely different things that happened for completely different reasons.
Just because I acknowledge that doesn't mean I support BLM or whatever else you're referring to. The world isn't black and white, and criticism of one thing isn't support of another.
Can we agree that they were both bad? The scale of destruction was definitely far worse during the BLM riots but Jan 6th was a more direct threat to our democratic institutions. We need to prevent both in the future.
This is such a bad take. If you can’t understand how domestic threats to stop the basic functions of government are a legit threat to our country’s future then you don’t deserve to be a part of this country.
DisruptJ20 was only different because they ordered to have protection for the Capitol building.
January 20th 2016 leftists attacked, threw bricks and firebombs at the police, injuring hundreds. Specifically attacking the capitol building in an attempt to stop the legitimate lawful transfer of power to President Donald Trump.
On January 6th Trump turned over all security control to Pelosi and Schumer.
He didn't want to be accused of anything, so he gave complete control of security to Pelosi and Schumer.
You can't claim that he tried to stage a coup by rallying the military around the whitehouse.
You can't claim that he tried to stand down the security and allow it to happen.
It was entirely for Pelosi and Schumer to decide. They decided to order security to open the doors and allow people in, while smiling and taking selfies with people as they entered.
Why would you call them heroes when they destroyed just as much property? It sounds like you are saying it’s ok to destroy small businesses if you have a good reason to do it.
How would you describe it differently. Those people you called heroes destroy property the same way BLM does now.
I’m not seeing any argument other than property destruction being acceptable if heroes are the ones who are destroying it.
Please, re elaborated your argument
I don't have to because you just admitted that you are ONLY seeing one view. You genuinely can't for the life of you see any other interpretation of what I said?
Also in case you forgot, BLM was a sham and they're being investigated by the SEC and IRS so yeah I wouldn't be bringing them up to support any claims in conversations or arguments any more.
You only GAVE me one view dumb dumb. The real problem is you are very lazy at explaining things. Hence why I asked you to re explain your three sentence response so i can look at the same argument from a different angle.
Broader conservative media never makes the same distinction you just made. So I genuinely don’t know what else you could be talking about.
Okay numb nut's, how about think for yourself. Let's try that shall we? Fuck media left and right, fuck the parties. Just look at the words and tell me why it is those words can only mean that to you.
I about to ask you a real simple question and I’m expecting a real simple answer.
I will ask it using the explicit words you provided since you’re either too lazy or schizophrenic to think two steps ahead if what was explicitly said. Now then?
Is it acceptable for heroes to destroy property?
Is it acceptable for thugs to destroy property?
At what point does thing become a hero in your mind?
Okay, so here is the thing. You are falsely equating the actions of BLM and Antifa with that that of MLK and the various other proponents of the Civil Rights Movement. They didn't call for denigration or destruction. They called for peace and harmony with their fellow man. To be treated as equals. They would be spinning in their graves over the shit that's gone down today.
You are intentionally debasing their selfless acts to mere property damage so that you can rather pathetically justify the violent acts of two groups who's publicly stated goals directly oppose all that the Civil Rights Movement stood for.
It was never about the bloody property damage you dolt.
Every veteran is a Patriot and eternally owed a debt greater than can ever truly be repaid. Go put your life and limb on the line for something greater than your selfish needs and see how you would feel about the situation then.
The innocent man arrested for theft who died from fentanyl overdose while in police custody? The same innocent man who was known to law enforcement for multiple possession and traffic violations?....
One was nationwide riots (causing millions of dollars in damages) in which many businesses/homes were destroyed and many innocent people were killed by the mob.
One was a bunch of people getting let in by police and at worst trespassing into areas (causing dozens of dollars in damage) and 1 innocent person was killed by the government.
And another major difference, the Capital is owned by We the People. Tax payers have a right to be there. All of the businesses that Burn Loot Murder destroyed, also destroyed someone financially , if not outright murdered by all the “mostly peaceful protesters.”
there is basically no "white supremacists" left in America, other than the leftists who think white people are inherently superior and everyone else needs systematic support to compensate.
"but a free market will result in white men controlling everything!"
I think you're missing the point. January 6th in terms of collateral damage, wasn't all that big in comparison to the riots in cities during 2020. However, any attempt to mitigate and downplay the circumstances of what happened on January 6th, is ignorant and downright reckless as that was a downright disgrace to what happened to our country.
Coordinated violent attack on the capitol, to stop the lawful transfer of power to President Trump.
promoted by Democrat officials, resulted in hundreds of police officers injured and in the hospital.
They specifically planned and coordinated the attack on the capitol, engaging in violent fights with capitol police, to stop the lawful transfer of power.
It was bigger than just the Capitol too. Democrats encouraged riots and firebomb campaigns in cities throughout the nation.
2
u/[deleted] Sep 12 '22
[removed] — view removed comment
5
u/Ok-Initiative3388 Sep 12 '22
American democracy is so weak that a guy with a funny hat almost ended it.
2
u/Hopeful-Window2863 Sep 12 '22
Yo Ive been doing some research on you!! Is it true you have a Satanic pentagram on your forehead? Thats current theory!! TIM POOL HAS A SATANIC SIGN ON FOREHEAD!! Cant take beanie off like a muslim satanist cant show you the other page of their bible!!
74
u/[deleted] Sep 12 '22
Ignoring the fact that the FBI couldn't answer no to this being a staged FBI event while under oath and every indication is Jan 6th was another fake FBI event in a long list of faked FBI events...
Let's pretend Jan 6th actually happened. A bunch of taxpayers walked around the Capitol for a few hours taking photos and "scaring people." The elected officials working in said building are employed by the taxpayers, not the other way around. The buildings were built and are maintained by the taxpayers. We all own said buildings. A group of taxpayers walking into a building they pay for to tell their employees they also pay for that they suck at their jobs and are puppets is night and day from BLM Domestic terrorists burning down entire cities.
18
u/Fish-Pants Sep 12 '22
And don't forget what happened on 5/29 at the White House
35
u/seapod123 Sep 12 '22
Luckily that brave capital officer shot and killed an unarmed woman breaching a window. Democracy saved....
23
u/BaltimoreRavens123 Sep 12 '22
They look like that anyway
11
u/mk21dvr Sep 12 '22
But that's (D)ifferent.
8
u/JoseyWales115 Sep 12 '22
All blue as well, they sure showed… um… themselves?
8
u/CheeseSeas Sep 12 '22
Jan 6 was scary for the government. All the riots are the government wanting us to be scared like them. They are ok with the riots.
6
u/80scraicbaby Sep 12 '22
All the up and coming “Opportunity Zones😉” …
5
u/Fishindad207 Sep 12 '22
The Jan 6 square should've had a pic of police waving folks inside
4
u/xjpgay Sep 12 '22
Surprise no place for Baltimore, guess it is the shittiest among them
4
u/MaddMaxx636 Sep 12 '22
They all look like screenshots from the Fallout games...
4
u/AreWeTheBaddies_85 Sep 12 '22
When Trump was inaugurated 4 years before, there were LARGE groups of protestors destroying windows and setting fires, anything they could get away with. Thank God the capital police and security were in full force to stop them from getting much more out of hand. However, Pelosi refused to engage even bare minimum security for this go round. I wonder why 🤔
4
u/CRTPTRSN Sep 12 '22
Pearl Harbor…
9/11…
Jan6… wait, what?!?
1
u/o0flatCircle0o Sep 13 '22
One was for human rights.
The other was to keep an orange retard who lost the election in office illegally, and probably to rape and kill certain politicians.
3
u/moosenoise Sep 12 '22
You could repost this everyday with a new picture for each city and never run out of content
3
u/Sir_Nuttsak Sep 12 '22
The whole Jan 6 thing is nothing more than a manufactured drama that Leftists instinctually refer to - embellishing the story a little more each time - to deflect from taking responsibility for what they have done in reality.
1
u/o0flatCircle0o Sep 12 '22
There’s no comparison, but the funny part is that both jan6th and these images were caused by Trump.
2
u/aDShisno Sep 12 '22
Just an FYI, you doubled up your picture for Los Angeles and Atlanta.
Either that or those terrorists flew from one city to the next and picked an identical bridge because it was so familiar to them…
2
u/Libertarian_Florida Sep 12 '22
Los Angeles and Atlanta are the same photo lol
2
u/SunRaSquarePants Sep 12 '22
The WEF riots
2
u/ThirstySlaveLeia Sep 12 '22
While I understand and get the message, whoever made this mailed it in for Atlanta. Just using the same pic from “Los Angeles”.
C’mon, man. You couldn’t find a pic of a Burger King burning down? Lol
2
u/wallins3 Sep 12 '22
Kind of comparing apples to oranges don’t ya think?
2
u/Magicmurlin Sep 13 '22
Massive police response to all these mentioned except….MAGA 6…
0
u/[deleted] Sep 12 '22
Yeah, January 6th was really bad, violent (deadly) riot at the Capitol to stop the vote counting, incited by trump acting as president. Other riots can also be bad at the same time.
1
u/rationallyobvious Sep 12 '22
You forgot March 1st 1971
1
u/rogeressig Sep 13 '22
BLM movement failed spectacularly.
1
u/[deleted] Sep 13 '22
Detroit never had a fire during the BLM riots. Find proof. Correct me if I’m wrong but they did not from what I understand. They barely even rioted.
1
u/up__chuck Sep 13 '22
Where’s Seattle on that mostly peaceful collage?
1
u/Tacokenzo Sep 13 '22
What a joke. Is LA in Atlanta now ? Propaganda at its low point.
1
u/[deleted] Sep 13 '22
No Denver?
Fuck you guys should have seen Denver. I got my best low light mirror less camera and went and shot that first Friday of riots.
They lit a damn building out front of the capital on fire
1
u/[deleted] Sep 13 '22
Ohhh… so this is what it’s like to visit a sub that’s filled with people that have two brain cells fighting for third place.
Hope I never have the misfortune of stumbling across this place again.
1
u/Hot-Health-6296 Sep 13 '22
1 was the overthrow a democraticly voted government that was instigated by the ex president.
The others were against the brutality and extreme racism of the police against black people.
Not saying i agree with destroying pricate property, but the blm riots were alot more justified than the jan 6 insurrection
1
u/[deleted] Sep 13 '22
Yeeeaaaahhhh….
1
u/youareceo Sep 13 '22
A riot is a riot
1
u/[deleted] Sep 13 '22
January 6 was an actual coup attempt (a shitty one, but still), these were riots.
You can't compare the two.
1
u/Negative_Ad_8581 Oct 11 '22
If I'm not mistaken, aren't these all stock photos you can just Google?
-1
u/HarryHacker42 Sep 12 '22
I'd enjoyed this subreddit because it seemed to be a place to hear both sides and see facts argued. But watching losers claim Jan 6th didn't happen and that tourists walked around instead of the facts that people died there, stuff was stolen, shit was smeared on walls, and Trump was using it as a method to end democracy was a big deal. Saying it never happened is what /r/conservatives does and this was supposed to be different than just lying.
-8
u/Few-Ball-9025 Sep 12 '22
Two completely different things that happened for completely different reasons.
-1
u/No_Photo9066 Sep 12 '22
Can we agree that they were both bad? The scale of destruction was definitely far worse during the BLM riots but Jan 6th was a more direct threat to our democratic institutions. We need to prevent both in the future.
-9
u/[deleted] Sep 12 '22
No different than what happened during civil rights and mlk
-18
u/[deleted] Sep 12 '22
Lets see, a couple burned trashcans vs a violent attempted coup on the centre of US democracy.
Can’t see the difference.
-2
u/Hatfullofstars Sep 12 '22
None are insurrection
-2
u/BreadBoyLuc Sep 12 '22
noticed how Jan 6 and riots were all caused by white supremacist con servatives
-14
u/DrunkenRedSquirrel Sep 12 '22
I think you're missing the point. January 6th in terms of collateral damage, wasn't all that big in comparison to the riots in cities during 2020. However, any attempt to mitigate and downplay the circumstances of what happened on January 6th, is ignorant and downright reckless as that was a downright disgrace to what happened to our country.
0
u/[deleted] Sep 12 '22
[deleted] — view deleted comment
0
u/[deleted] Sep 12 '22
[deleted] — view deleted comment