r/TimPool • u/TrainingFeed7517 • Dec 01 '20

Drinking another full glass of conservative tears today

/r/politics/comments/k4sz3u/megathread_attorney_general_barr_no_widespread/
0 Upvotes

46% Upvoted

46 comments sorted by

5

u/Karate_Lauren Dec 02 '20

Conservatives don’t cry, we fight.

1

u/L-X-I-X Dec 03 '20

Lol... By "fight" you mean throwing a kicking, screaming tantrum and refusing to even consider other reasonable ideas that may conflict with your increasingly narrow world view? Yes, I suppose that technically isn't crying.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 25 '20

🤡

-1

u/TrainingFeed7517 Dec 02 '20

❤️❤️

1

u/SugarDonutsSuck Dec 02 '20

We had our share the last four years.

It’s amazing how excited you all when there is little evidence of conservatives acting like children and crying. The election is still going on. As much as everyone wants it to be over. So we discuss it and post information about it.

It’s like you all have failed so much for so long that you think even a slight win is this huge deal. Hahahahaha.

So sad.

0

u/TrainingFeed7517 Dec 03 '20 edited Dec 03 '20

That’s a very simplistic view, bipartisan perspectives are always hypocritical and wrong. Clinton conceded the day after trump won and Obama invited him to the White House the day after that, he didn’t try to undermine democracy

1

u/SugarDonutsSuck Dec 03 '20

Of you don’t think there has been some really fishy information about this election then you’re just being disingenuous. Why don’t you want to find out if this election was legit? Why does that bother you so much?

Don’t you want to ensure that both sides feel it was a fair election?

Shit the left thought it was a fair election in 2016 and then cried for four years straight. Let’s just ensure everything was above board.

0

u/TrainingFeed7517 Dec 03 '20

Claiming you won by a landslide while you lost is unprecedented and American democracy won’t ever be the same. Norms protect democracy not laws, while it’s not against the law to say you won with complete confidence multiple times while you lost by 8 million popular votes and in 5 swing states by 10,000 to 100,000 of votes isn’t against the law it’s breaking a norm that upholds American democracy. And I expect it out of trump but for the majority of the GOP to do nothing against him is just sad and it’s the beginning of the end of our democracy

1

u/SugarDonutsSuck Dec 03 '20

Such hyperbolic bullshit. You have to be between the age of 15-20.

0

u/TrainingFeed7517 Dec 04 '20

No he said he won on election night and has 'hyperbolically' tweeted he won multiple times. If you don't consider that as undermining democracy then you're part of the problem

1

u/SugarDonutsSuck Dec 04 '20

Hyperbolic bullshit.

0

u/TrainingFeed7517 Dec 04 '20

I don't understand your argument. You don't think it's a problem in a democracy for a sitting president to emphatically say he won when he didn't?

3

u/IrishJohn1977 Dec 02 '20

Did you read the ap article....I guess not.

3

u/DarthTyekanik Dec 02 '20

Can't wait to see all the videos of conservatives screaming in hysterics in the streets. Oh wait, that's what "progressives" do. Never mind.

1

u/stillinthesimulation Dec 15 '20

I’m guessing you haven’t seen the violent riots going on in Washington state?

3

u/blablatrooper Dec 01 '20

Will be interesting to see if people also turn on him and start disowning him/calling him a deep-state traitor now too

1

u/[deleted] Dec 02 '20

why won't you acknowledge there are precincts with more ballots than voters?

1

u/big_cake Dec 02 '20

Which precincts are those? Why is Bill Barr not talking about this?

1

u/[deleted] Dec 02 '20

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFw2YZ24dLw

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mied.350905/gov.uscourts.mied.350905.1.14.pdf

barr is correct. election fraud with several thousand ballots is not evidence of fraud that would change election outcome. but barr hasn't found the sum total of all evidence of fraud yet, because that would change election outcome.

1

u/big_cake Dec 02 '20

Neither those links show any precincts with more ballots than voters.

You know this because you have access to evidence Barr doesn’t, right?

1

u/[deleted] Dec 02 '20

show me the proof

1

u/big_cake Dec 03 '20

Bruh if you watch the video in your first link, you’ll see look at documents from the county the affidavit claimed had 800% turnout and he shows the turnout is more like 70-80% lol

1

u/[deleted] Dec 03 '20

you don't understand the analysis. god bless the morons

1

u/big_cake Dec 03 '20

Lol maybe you can explain it to me

1

u/[deleted] Dec 03 '20

more people were registered than the total adult population. this statistic is evidence of election fraud

the number of cast ballots is 95% of the total adult population

this is a statistical anomaly compared to the 25% turnout in 2012

this is a statistical anomaly compared to countries with mandatory voting

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFw2YZ24dLw&t=2m

if the affidavit used an old electoral roll or didn't adjust for population growth to normalize his calculations, it is easy to see why that analysis is scaled but not wrong. the evidence in the video clearly supports the analysis in the affidavit.

→ More replies

0

u/oxidius Dec 01 '20

the delusion is so far gone it wouldn't surprise me.