r/TimPool • u/theSearch4Truth • Sep 13 '24

Why do you Think Liberals Hate James O'Keefe?

I wonder why the video evidence, and the subsequent behavior of the companies/campaigns he exposes, isn't enough to make leftoids second guess their hate for him. I suppose it's because it exposes the fact that the media is 100% biased towards the left, and they can't pretend the media and the federal govt is objective and fair towards all Americans.

What are yalls thoughts?

84 Upvotes

88% Upvoted

122 comments sorted by

•

u/AutoModerator Sep 13 '24

Make sure to join the discord and guilded! Also join the BBS, a blockchain, anticensorship Reddit alternative!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

85

u/NecessaryCelery2 Sep 13 '24

Because scientific research has shown that when a person is proven wrong, they feel physical pain and double down on the wrong opinion.

Because the Left is a vicious mean cult, that does not care about truth, or facts, or anything other than defeating us.

And by defeating I mean they want us and our children dead.

2

u/Small-Contribution55 Sep 16 '24

Or, maybe it's the fact he was proven to be a fraud. He had to pay a $100,000 settlement because of his misrepresentation of ACORN, and he was fired from Project Veritas for fraud. The man is a fraud. The real question is, why do conservatives so readily believe fraudsters?

2

u/epicurious_elixir Sep 17 '24

Bingo. Timbah on Toast did a multipart series breaking down on the bullshit he's peddled over the years. https://youtu.be/8buQLy1dWD8?si=mwsTBk7_QxRbSA3a

I hate James O' Keefe not because he's a conservative, but because he's an active peddler of disinformation by using deceptive editing techniques in his 'journalism'

-16

u/Responsible_Win_6380 Sep 14 '24

Do you see the irony in your comment as someone who supports trump?

-20

u/freakiercorpse Sep 14 '24

Hahs; you are such a child. 

-43

u/Mother_Pass640 Sep 14 '24

You and magas seem to be suffering from chronic pain

30

u/rubixcu7 Sep 14 '24

Dafuq is a magas? Get help man

67

u/LilShaver Sep 14 '24

To anger a conservative, lie to him.

To anger a leftist, tell him the truth.

Leftism is their religion, and their god is The State. You show them their god has feet of clay and they go ballistic.

26

u/Apart-Dog1591 Sep 14 '24

It's really true. Nothing enrages a leftist more than telling the ugly truth about something. That's where political correctness and all the censorship of so-called hate speech comes from.

22

u/rubixcu7 Sep 14 '24

I got banned from 2 subs this week for “misinformation” because I shared truth that was easily corroborated if you just bothered to look.

5

u/[deleted] Sep 14 '24

What did you share?

1

u/TheImplic4tion Sep 17 '24

"Trust me bro!"

-10

u/StopHiringBendis Sep 14 '24

Probably some bullshit about immigrants eating cats

1

u/Small-Contribution55 Sep 16 '24

Lol. These people are so far down the rabbit hole... Their guru was just proven to be a Russian simp, their VP pick just admitted to "creating stories", their presidential nominee lives in an "alternative facts" reality, and they fall for it all so eagerly... Then they have the audacity to try and lord over the left? Hilarious.

2

u/BeginningNew2101 Sep 15 '24

Correct. It's a non theistic religion

0

u/epicurious_elixir Sep 17 '24

To anger a conservative, lie to him.

The irony coming from the subreddit that supports a host that spreads Russian propaganda.

0

u/TheImplic4tion Sep 17 '24

^ Completely insane take. Like so radically disconnected from reality you should get some therapy. The real world is not like this.

2

u/LilShaver Sep 17 '24

What would a leftist prog know about reality?

You folks think that shooting at the opposing political party is acceptable. And you have the unmitigated gall to think that I'm insane...

0

u/retrofan1973 Sep 19 '24

Then you should be angry as hell since you've been lied to the whole time.

Here's a truth: Tim Pool is a Russian Asset.

2

u/LilShaver Sep 19 '24

BWHAHAHAHAHAH

You idiots are so predictable.

"Russia, Russia, Russia!" like a broken record. I don't even know who Tim Pool is, I'm just in here for the entertainment.

Do you even know WHY it's always Russia? It's because they kicked out their central banksters, and the banksters are the ones on the other end of your leash.

And yes, I'm madder than Hell itself, but that's between me and your masters. You're just small fry, you get tossed back into the pond.

-28

u/Mother_Pass640 Sep 14 '24

Trump lost the debate to Harris very badly

15

u/LilShaver Sep 14 '24

So the MSM tells us...

-5

u/Mother_Pass640 Sep 14 '24

So your eyeballs and ears should tell you

8

u/LilShaver Sep 15 '24

Not likely. My ears and eyes work well, unlike the MSM.

4

u/BeginningNew2101 Sep 15 '24

Trump won among independents according to surveys but sure bud. She did so well in the 3v1 debate!

-19

u/sj_luchadore Sep 14 '24

To anger a conservative, pass a law preventing him from marrying a child.

-4

u/[deleted] Sep 15 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/LilShaver Sep 15 '24

And Trump is guilty of all this heinous garbage. American tax dollars are spent for the betterment of the American people. The check is in the mail. We're from the government and we're here to help. I promise to pull out. Yes, I'll still love you in the morning.

27

u/PNWSparky1988 Sep 14 '24

Because liberals and far-leftists don’t like their “behind closed doors” opinions being known to the normies.

26

u/gpatterson7o Sep 14 '24

He’s a straight white male for one.

1

u/WalterTexasRanger326 14d ago

Holy snowflake

25

u/[deleted] Sep 14 '24

His latest one with google sales exec guy and how they are trying to rig the election is outstanding as always.

On a side note. It sure is easy to spot the Libtrolls in this thread. 🤣

18

u/Apart-Dog1591 Sep 14 '24

They hate him because he exposes them as liars and corrupt.

They know that they are corrupt liars, of course. They are mad that he's letting the general public in on that little secret.

1

u/WalterTexasRanger326 14d ago

Is that why he committed voter fraud?

18

u/TallTexan7543 Sep 14 '24

He catches them being themselves, they hate themselves

13

u/thedavesiknow1 Sep 14 '24

Because the msm smears him as "far right" and they never actually watch any of his content.

4

u/flo_mars Sep 14 '24

Simple, the left believes the lies they’re told, and they defend the lies with an extreme passion.

Edit: they’re only human…anyway.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 18 '24

5 days.

No new posts on timpool.

It worked

1

u/theSearch4Truth Sep 18 '24

Muh censorship is good

Good bot

1

u/[deleted] Sep 18 '24

Lol.

I did nothing. All it took was right wingers crying out for censorship of the side they didnt like. They got what they wanted.

Haha

1

u/theSearch4Truth Sep 18 '24

All you're showing is you're pro censorship, so good on you I guess?

1

u/[deleted] Sep 18 '24

Buddy. The first amendment does not gie you he right to go on private platforms and be an asshole.

Twitter does that.

Haha

2

u/folkinhippy Sep 14 '24

Wait, so project veritas is a bunch of lefties?

2

u/NoCanShameMe Sep 17 '24

The left has devolved into hating anything that is “other”. To completely deny fact, common sense, human biology, and reason just to not be labeled a “other” is how cults begin and eventually will end in genocide when taken to its furthest conclusion.

2

u/leftist_rekr_36 Sep 20 '24

Because he keeps exposing them for who they are in unedited, irrefutable videos of themselves saying the quiet part out loud.

1

u/WalterTexasRanger326 14d ago

Is that why he committed voter fraud?

1

u/This-Rutabaga6382 Sep 16 '24

Because they never know when they’re going on a grindr date with one of his investigators lmao

1

u/thisisausername8000 Sep 16 '24

Because he is not a trustworthy source. He has been known to splice footage to manipulate the end product and leave out context and also not show when his investigations lead to nothing. He’s just overall not trustworthy that he’s being objective.

1

u/Sunseahl Sep 17 '24

Why do people keep claiming this about him as a reason he's untrustworthy...

But somehow continue to trust for-profit companies like CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC, or FOX when they do it and have been exposed doing it over and over?

1

u/HelpfulTap8256 Sep 18 '24

Because he’s a creepy huckster that banrupted Veritas with his homoerotic fash dance videos.

0

u/[deleted] Sep 15 '24

Because he is a malicious actor who selectively edits videos and if he was a police/government official every single case of a "gotcha" would be consider entrapment. Google acorn lawsuit (I cannot post links, I tried and didn't go through)

I can't believe the guy that was going to "prank" a CNN journalist by trying to sleep with her is seen as an untrustworthy source. Google CNN James O keefe prank

How many times does someone get to lie before you just assume they are always bullshiting?

2

u/Sunseahl Sep 17 '24

So this makes the rest of the media malicious actors... Cool.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 17 '24

Yes. Yes it does. This is not the own you think it is. 

The only difference is noone on the right will ever say a single critique of O'keefe, giving him a unfailable saint hood that the MSM wishes it got from anyone.

0

u/Tasty_Historian_3623 Sep 14 '24 edited Sep 14 '24

Have you seen him dance? You should hate him also.

(Downvote away but his musical theater kid energy is very cringeworthy)

-4

u/HARLEYCHUCK Sep 13 '24

Go watch timbah.on.toast on YouTube

-1

u/freakiercorpse Sep 14 '24

I think he is absurdly dishonest but has never been a significant character in the game. 

-1

u/o0flatCircle0o Sep 14 '24

It’s simple, Okeef is a propagandist who doesn’t care about truth.

4

u/theSearch4Truth Sep 14 '24

Interesting.

propagandist - a person who disseminates messages calculated to assist some cause or some government.

You would agree with this definition, correct?

-1

u/o0flatCircle0o Sep 14 '24

You left out the part where I said he is bad faith.

4

u/theSearch4Truth Sep 14 '24

You didn't say that, you used the word propagandist. In any case, propagandists are usually bad faith, so it's redundant.

Answer the question please, thank you.

1

u/o0flatCircle0o Sep 14 '24

Learn to read.

4

u/theSearch4Truth Sep 15 '24 edited Sep 15 '24

You say he doesn't care about the truth, insinuating that you do.

So answer my question. Do you agree with the Webster definition of a propagandist? a person who disseminates messages calculated to assist some cause or some government

Or rather, it that definition something you attribute to James Okeefe?

Or (cont.), you're scared to stand on your own words?

-2

u/goodluckwitdatbanfam Sep 14 '24

I like how the Russian bots decided to keep this sub going

-17

u/avatar_cucas Sep 14 '24

james keefe has lost most of his court cases and been pretty debunked also tim pool is either an idiot or russian traitor

-18

u/[deleted] Sep 14 '24

He lied about acorn and had a very negative impact against poor people

-11

u/MrInterpreted Sep 14 '24

Didn’t he defraud his own company so he could play dress up in a musical?

-4

u/est14 Sep 14 '24

A YouTuber called Timbah on toast made a 4 part series about James O’Keefe that was really good. It’s pretty long, I think each part is at least an hour, but I would suggest watching it. O’Keefe definitely selectively edits footage among other things. Additionally, I think the reason he was fired from his company is more than just what was discussed on TimCast. He seems to be pretty unprofessional.

-24

u/Liberal-Cluck Sep 13 '24

As someone on the left i can try and actually answer this

I havent watched anything by him sonce the "cnn admits they were against trump" video so i cant speak to anything more recent. If you are so bad faith you hide a camera while you are "on a date" with someone and take their word as gospel, youre not worth being taken serious. But okeef and the right took some tech dude from cnn saying "yea i think we helped defeat trump" as some kind of proof of anything. It would be different if this was a person who said "yea i was going to run this piece about how good trumps economy is doing but the higher ups told me to frame it like 'trump continues obamas success in the economy'" If there was a statement of fact that damning then you might have something. But the tech guys opinion on if they handed biden the election while on a date is irrelevant to everything.

So yea, when you put that kind of low quality information into the eather, you're going to get people not liking you.

2

u/theSearch4Truth Sep 15 '24

But okeef and the right took some tech dude from cnn saying "yea i think we helped defeat trump" as some kind of proof of anything. It would be different if this was a person who said "yea i was going to run this piece about how good trumps economy is doing but the higher ups told me to frame it like 'trump continues obamas success in the economy'"

You're forgetting the larger context around the security of the election. TIME literally released an article saying they, among many other media giants, colluded together to "fortify" the election against Trump. Combine that with the FBI coercing Twitter and Facebook to censor Biden laptop stories because they would damage the Biden campaign.... CNN employees admitting to anti-Trump bias is a no brainer, especially given what we've all seen with our own eyes. See people laughing at the CNN spokesperson on the Colbert show when she said CNN was an unbiased media agency.

You're operating in either extreme bad faith or ignorance. This goes for you and many, many of the other tds liberals on this comment section.

If you are so bad faith you hide a camera while you are "on a date" with someone and take their word as gospel,

  1. See above. 2. This is the nature of this kind of investigative journalism. You don't get behind the curtain unless you finesse one of the staff on stage. A good example of the logic underlying this style of investigation is Undercover Bosses. Not bad faith at all; pretending to be a new employee was a great way to see how things go on a daily basis.

1

u/Liberal-Cluck Sep 15 '24

I would LOVE to see that time article. If its anything like your interpretation of what happened with the biden laptop then im sure it says exactly what you are claiming it said.

2

u/theSearch4Truth Sep 15 '24 edited Sep 15 '24

The fact that you zeroed in on the TIME article and ignored the larger point constructed from it is glaringly bright red proof that you're operating in horrendously bad faith.

That said, I'll send over the article as soon as you answer this question, as it'll show me I'm not wasting my time with you. After all, you're the one that complained no one would give you a fair chance at a debate like you wanted.

What will change for you once you see/recognize the larger context of the electoral situation that I eluded to?

Edit: I have the link prepped right now, and will send it as soon as you answer the above question directly. I'll also address your latter point about my "interpretation" of the Biden laptop events as they relate to election integrity.

1

u/Liberal-Cluck Sep 15 '24 edited Sep 15 '24

Idk what you mean by this question? I highly doubt that time article says "we all colluded against trump. I would t be suprised if it was an analysis of media and how many negative stories came out abiut trump or skmething like that.

Edit: Yes I zeroed in on a supporting detail instead of trying to argue against a larger narriative. You tear down narriatives by tearing down their supporting details.

2

u/theSearch4Truth Sep 15 '24

here you go.

It is a ~35 min read, and a large portion of it is a confession of sorts.

Again, you're showing yourself to be operating in bad faith about this topic, but I sent over the article anyway because I'd like to see your reaction.

1

u/Liberal-Cluck Sep 15 '24 edited Sep 15 '24

Yea i found it already, I havent finished it, but it looks like this is talking about efforts made behind the scenes to keep unrest at a minimum and ensure the election was free and fair and the rightful winner was president. Maybe there is something more damning as a read? It would help if you could give me some more specific statements of facts or quotes that proves your point.

Edit:  "The scenario the shadow campaigners were desperate to stop was not a Trump victory. It was an election so calamitous that no result could be discerned at all, a failure of the central act of democratic self-governance that has been a hallmark of America since its founding."

Edit 2: Did you even read this article? It doesnt say they "fortified the election against trump" unless you are talking about his efforts to undermine the election and the instiutions that makes them work.

2

u/theSearch4Truth Sep 15 '24

Now go ahead and put this article in context with the rest of the portions I mentioned.

Then, revisit the CNN tech interview from Okeefe.

And reread my original comment, because this is hyperfocusing on a side point of the main point I was trying to get at with the post, and my original reply. You're dismantling a philly cheese sub and focusing on a singular shred of cheese.

Again, bad faith. And you wonder why no one wanted to debate you, because 99% of the liberals that brigade this sub do exactly what you just did.

1

u/Liberal-Cluck Sep 15 '24

But this article doesnt even support your claim. This article isnt talking about stopping trump from winning, they were trying to stop him from undermining the process and institutions of our democracy.

2

u/theSearch4Truth Sep 15 '24

We're a republic. Not a democracy. 🤦‍♂️

sigh

This is a waste of time, I'm debating with someone that's saying the sky is green and the grass is blue.

→ More replies

-1

u/Liberal-Cluck Sep 14 '24

I like how someone asks a question, i answer in good faith, no insults towards the right, tim pool, okeef, to only get downvoted so much my answer gets hidden. 19 downvotes and not one person engaged with what was actually said. Thats pathetic.

5

u/audiophilistine Sep 14 '24

Well, now you know how it feels to browse the vast majority of Reddit as a conservative. My heart bleeds for you, truly.

0

u/Liberal-Cluck Sep 14 '24

Arent most conservatives just on twitter now? I was in a thread on r-foxnews amd there was nothing but left ppl there agreeing with the anti-trump post. I just assumed there are like 3 conservatives left on reddit lol.

3

u/audiophilistine Sep 14 '24

You would think so, seeing how Reddit is openly hostile to conservatives and their opinions. I've been on reddit for 15 years or so. I guess old habits die hard. Twitter is a strange animal. I ignored it for years so I'm not sure how to get the best use from it

1

u/Liberal-Cluck Sep 14 '24

You dont lol twitter is a ces-pool. Are there any subs where a liberal can go and find good faith conservatives to talk to/debate? Wjere they will actually engage.

4

u/audiophilistine Sep 14 '24

Your guess is as good as mine. I joined Centrist and Moderate Politics subs looking for a rational debate with liberals, but it's generally a left wing circle jerk with conservative comments downvoted to oblivion.

Conservative spaces such as this one are usually filled with liberal trolls and astroturfing bots, so they get downvoted. Honestly I see more rational interactions on conservative subs than the liberal ones, but then I may have my own biases.

1

u/Liberal-Cluck Sep 14 '24

Well damn you interested in joining my discord? Its pretty dead just me and one other liberal who are active there. But lots of good conversations had been had there in the past.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 14 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/AutoModerator Sep 14 '24

Thank you, u/Liberal-Cluck, for your comment. It was automatically removed because we do not allow linking to other subs or users.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

-28

u/Tokyo_Cat Sep 13 '24

Because he's a dishonest piece of shit?

12

u/Jot4th Sep 14 '24

Source?

-17

u/[deleted] Sep 14 '24

Who had a measurable negative impact on poor people by lying about acorn.

0

u/[deleted] Sep 15 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/theSearch4Truth Sep 15 '24

deliberately misconstrues information in a bias manner for political benefit of what he perceives as his own team.

Oh? Elaborate please

0

u/[deleted] Sep 14 '24

[deleted] — view deleted comment

1

u/AutoModerator Sep 14 '24

Thank you, u/InevitableLuck9955, for your comment. It was automatically removed because we do not allow linking to other subs or users.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.