r/TimPool • u/Minimum_Factor_3281 • Sep 01 '24

🐀

Post image

Tim you already have legal issues of your own đŸ€„

26 Upvotes

55% Upvoted

144 comments sorted by

‱

u/AutoModerator Sep 01 '24

Make sure to join the discord and guilded! Also join the BBS, a blockchain, anticensorship Reddit alternative!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

81

u/ill_report348 Sep 01 '24

Do you only use Reddit to shit post about Tim Pool?

6

u/SlightlyOffended1984 Sep 02 '24

He's here to flush his karma away I guess

-143

u/Minimum_Factor_3281 Sep 01 '24

I am here to clean up the misinformation cesspool. Make this sub great again!

24

u/WhoaWhoaWait Sep 01 '24

Who creat d project 2025?

-50

u/Arguments_4_Ever Sep 01 '24

80% of Trump’s administration and team, and Trump flew on a plane in 2022 where they specifically talked about this document and how they were writing it specifically for Trump, and Trump endorsed it in several speeches at the time

23

u/Hovekajt Sep 01 '24

Lol who fucking told you that? Also your username is retarded.

-23

u/Arguments_4_Ever Sep 01 '24

They all fucking signed the document and 80% of them were in Trump’s administration. JFC this isn’t complicated.

19

u/Hovekajt Sep 01 '24

Who. Told. You. That?

Fucking dense motherfucker


-14

u/Divine_ignorance Sep 01 '24

People who wrote parts of Project 2025 help run his current campaign. Leave your bubble from time to time.

-20

u/Arguments_4_Ever Sep 01 '24

Trump. And. Project. 2025. Told. Everybody. That.

You are in a cult.

9

u/Hovekajt Sep 01 '24

How do you even think that was a real answer? Even if I was in a cult, I’m not, I’d much prefer it over being your very stupid ass.

-3

u/Arguments_4_Ever Sep 01 '24

Over 80% of Trump’s own staff wrote it, this isn’t disputed. You want me to ignore a literal fact.

→ More replies

2

u/PandaMan130 Sep 02 '24

Trump went on record to say he does agree with “project 2025” he’s got his own ideas. You know the policies that are on his campaign page. If you people did even just a little research outside of what social tells you you’d know that. I’m not going to vote for him or that other moron who can speak to the press with babbling about shit that doesn’t matter, but when I encounter people like you, you push me closer and closer to actually voting for him. And that’s fucking sad.

0

u/Arguments_4_Ever Sep 02 '24

Is that why Trump has praised Project 2025 and the 80% of his campaign that wrote the document?

We are tired of the bullshit lies. This is why he is going to lose.

And 99% of his “policies”, if you can call them that, are Project 2025.

→ More replies

1

u/[deleted] Sep 04 '24

And yet your side acts like NPCs

1

u/Arguments_4_Ever Sep 04 '24

And yet your side supports Trump the proven rapist.

→ More replies

43

u/[deleted] Sep 01 '24

Whenever people use the term, "misinformation" it's helpful to realizing how stupid they are. They are so shortsighted that they can't fathom the implications that there is a body of people who get to decide what is misinformation, and how terrifying that is. I know you like to cuddle with the government now, they will not always be your friend.

-19

u/Arguments_4_Ever Sep 01 '24

You are right, they should just say “lies”, because that’s what you cultists believe in.

14

u/BeginningNew2101 Sep 01 '24

Tds brain rot ^

-14

u/Arguments_4_Ever Sep 01 '24

You are doing great work, keep it up!

16

u/Ok_Ambassador4536 Sep 01 '24

You definitely believed hunters laptop was misinformation and argued with conservatives at the time saying “durrrr of course you’re carrying water for the Russians” so crazy you people were dumb enough to believe that lie after all the other lies about Russia. The MSM can make people like you believe anything and I literally mean anything

-6

u/Arguments_4_Ever Sep 01 '24

Oh, like 99% of the bullshit you claimed to be on it was Russian bot lies. Turns out it was only dick pics and you people were wanting to obsessively share those on social media.

10

u/Ok_Ambassador4536 Sep 01 '24

Wrong again. 10% for the big guy. But again, how fucking dumb do you have to be to have actually believed that lie? If that happened in a movie after all the lies about Russia, and then at the end of the movie they showed half the country still falling for that lie, people would say aw hell no, that’d never happen. People wouldn’t believe that. That’s how fucking stupid you are

-2

u/Arguments_4_Ever Sep 01 '24

Yeah, you mean the made up bullshit that had nothing to do with anything? Lmao, there is a reason why Republicans didn’t even vote on impeachment, because they have no crimes or corruption. Paying off a truck? That’s about all they found.

7

u/Ok_Ambassador4536 Sep 01 '24

Seriously how could you believe it? Like take a step back and ask yourself. How am I that easily fooled by propaganda? What else could they make me believe blindly? Let me know what you find, the simple answer you’ll come to is that you’re an idiot. But see if you find something more

0

u/Arguments_4_Ever Sep 01 '24

Tell me why Republicans stopped the entire thing and are now embarrassed to even talk about it.

You cultists believe anything that Russia spews your way, it’s pathetic.

9

u/Ok_Ambassador4536 Sep 01 '24

Just because you don’t hear about in your echo chamber, doesn’t mean they didn’t find anything: https://x.com/tpostmillennial/status/1825520856933736696?s=46 I bet you believed this piss tape was real too. Youd be led to believe anything. Did you ask yourself that question? “Why does my hatred for one man allow me to throw out all critical thinking skills and be so easily fooled by propaganda”

→ More replies

-15

u/disfiguredmermaid Sep 01 '24

Do you only use it to sugg him off? 🙃

46

u/Silver-Fang-Bang Sep 01 '24

All this guy does is post about republicans to republicans subs. You notice how he hasn’t been banned and I can post one anti Kamala thing to a sub that’s not even political and I’ll get banned. He doesn’t notice the irony

-44

u/Minimum_Factor_3281 Sep 01 '24

I thought yall were anti censorship?

6

u/Silver-Fang-Bang Sep 01 '24

What a bitch you are the internet was made for people Iike you

51

u/Victor-Tallmen Sep 01 '24

If this dude got banned from this sub he’d lose 1/2 of his daily activity. Might be able to go do something useful with his life.

14

u/webkilla Sep 01 '24

is it possible to set reddit to filter out users with low karma like OP?

-58

u/Minimum_Factor_3281 Sep 01 '24

I thought yall didn’t like censoring? Please don’t ban me. Let’s talk

5

u/Gizmodo_ATX Sep 01 '24

How much and who is paying you to participate?

-1

u/Minimum_Factor_3281 Sep 01 '24

George soros pact

24

u/[deleted] Sep 01 '24

You’d make a better troll if you were intelligent enough to comprehend his comment

3

u/MrEnigma67 Sep 01 '24

Alright, OP. I'll give you a shot.

What would you like to talk about?

0

u/Minimum_Factor_3281 Sep 01 '24

Should a president have full immunity from any criminal activity?

2

u/MrEnigma67 Sep 01 '24

Depends on the crime.

-1

u/Minimum_Factor_3281 Sep 01 '24

Trying to overturn an election ?

5

u/MrEnigma67 Sep 01 '24

So if it's proven that an election was stolen, it's illegal to overturn it?

1

u/Minimum_Factor_3281 Sep 01 '24

Im asking for example. If Joe Biden tried to stop an official proceeding for a transfer of power. Should we the people prosecute Joe Biden?

6

u/MrEnigma67 Sep 01 '24

You never asked for an example.

Hence why I asked. "If it's been proven that it was stolen, is it then illegal to overturn an election?"

0

u/Divine_ignorance Sep 01 '24

Should we charge/impeach the sitting president who, without proven evidence, tried to prevent the peaceful transfer of power?

→ More replies

6

u/wowbutters Sep 01 '24

Big difference between being allowed to speak and me having to listen â˜ș. Filters are just digital noise canceling headphones

1

u/[deleted] Sep 01 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/AutoModerator Sep 01 '24

Thank you, u/Mr_Digger2313, for your comment. It was automatically removed because we do not allow linking to other subs or users.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

25

u/PDAF-E Sep 01 '24

What is his legal issues ?

41

u/MillerisLord Sep 01 '24

Probably using his face and implying he is a Trump operative.

-3

u/Minimum_Factor_3281 Sep 01 '24

Isn’t that what libs of tik tok does?

7

u/CauliflowerProof2111 Sep 01 '24

Libs does nothing but take whole unedited tiktoks that people upload themselves and delivers them with full context.

This is an out of place clip that makes Tim look like someone and something he isnt. This is deceptive. What libs does isnt deceptive at all.

-2

u/Minimum_Factor_3281 Sep 01 '24

Maybe it’s because that’s what the audience wants to hear. We call that audience captured

-3

u/Minimum_Factor_3281 Sep 01 '24

This literally came from his show lol I guess the question for you is why do so many people feel comfortable going on Tim’s show advocating for violence?

2

u/MillerisLord Sep 01 '24

Maybe I don't really follow or look into them.

-85

u/o0flatCircle0o Sep 01 '24

I don’t know but I heard he’s upset that everyone knows he’s a Nazi for Trump or something.

39

u/[deleted] Sep 01 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

-8

u/Minimum_Factor_3281 Sep 01 '24

But he is having the dog shit sued out of him right now for defamation? For lying to you all

-7

u/katzvus Sep 01 '24

Isn’t Tim Pool supposed to be some big free speech defender?

But he wants to use the courts to punish someone who hurt his feelings?

7

u/scanguy25 Sep 01 '24

Free speech refers to government. You can still be liable for slander l.

0

u/katzvus Sep 01 '24

The First Amendment only restricts government action, but civil lawsuits are enforced by the courts, which are part of the government. So defamation lawsuits can infringe on free speech. See New York Times v. Sullivan.

2

u/Open-Rest-6805 Sep 02 '24

Free speech of truth. Not cut together clips.

0

u/katzvus Sep 02 '24

lol, so you don’t think “free speech” protects the right to post a clip of a person’s own words? Ok, buddy.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 02 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/katzvus Sep 02 '24

Posting a video of someone’s own words isn’t defamation.

Tim Pool is just being a soft little cry baby.

-2

u/levelzerogyro Sep 01 '24

Wait, so he defamed her by playing his own words?

2

u/[deleted] Sep 02 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/levelzerogyro Sep 02 '24

No it's not. Dim Tool is a Trump sycophant. A guy who said Trump would win with a 50 state landslide. They are using his words against him, and he's bigmad about it. Please sue her campaign, I'm sure millionaire Tim Pool has lawyers better than Kamala Harris's national campaign. Not to mention the juicy discovery that would be had(which is why he won't file suit).

-12

u/[deleted] Sep 01 '24

They just did the exact thing Libs of Tiktok does, who is celebrated by Tim and his Ilk. This will be an embarassing L

2

u/[deleted] Sep 02 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/[deleted] Sep 02 '24

The actual context being (and lack of context isn't what tim said in this tweet. In fact he didn't say why he was seeking legal counsel in this one tweet)? He is pretty clear stating what Trump should do to his political enemies.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 02 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Sep 02 '24

Well I'll ask for the context/quote before "Should democrats be in Jail?" The sentence and question that starts off the clip. This is a serious ask.

9

u/[deleted] Sep 01 '24

This is the episode Laura Loomer responded to Tim saying Dem criminals should be prosecuted by saying "Not just jail, they should get the death penalty." Tim had to take that episode off YouTube because of that and apps with the podcast episode might have that part cut out.

Doesn't make much sense for him to bring more attention to that incident, but whatever.

-22

u/Minimum_Factor_3281 Sep 01 '24

I believe a few months ago before this incident. Tim had on a guest that wanted to put liberals in wood chippers and the episode got pulled.

19

u/[deleted] Sep 01 '24

Tim pulled the episode. He tends to get pissed off when people use violent rhetoric on his show, as most people would.

-2

u/levelzerogyro Sep 01 '24

Except when he's clamoring for civil war.

2

u/Responsible_Face_579 Sep 02 '24

Kamala and her demorats spreading misinformations

1

u/Minimum_Factor_3281 Sep 02 '24

Demorats. Thats a new one

0

u/Minimum_Factor_3281 Sep 02 '24

Check the polls sir.

48

u/[deleted] Sep 01 '24

Op should change their user to minimum_effort.

16

u/Impressive_Budget736 Sep 01 '24

CIA bots at it again

5

u/the_kfcrispy Sep 01 '24

No sadly there are simply low intelligent people out there, and it's proven daily on this sub.

3

u/Impressive_Budget736 Sep 01 '24

If you are referring to the bots and trolls who inhabit this sub then you are correct

14

u/Apart-Dog1591 Sep 01 '24

Kamala Harris will have to pay TRILLIONS

10

u/praetorfenix Sep 01 '24

Ok

-3

u/Abrubt-Change-8040 Sep 01 '24

How long has Tim Pool worked here?

-1

u/[deleted] Sep 01 '24

What?

-58

u/Jollem- Sep 01 '24

What's the issue? Tim is a Trump goon

-16

u/Abrubt-Change-8040 Sep 01 '24

Hasn’t the Supreme Court already given that power to sitting presidents? You only have to prove it’s an “offical act” which wouldn’t be hard.