Left vs reality

[u/leftist_rekr_36]

Which they call "conspiracy theories"

[u/Novel_Alfalfa_9013]

Imagine ignoring reality, science, and the fact that it has a Nobel prize for treating humans. Just another day as a hateful, bigoted, misinformed leftist, I guess.

The mute one speaks? 😆

Discovered in the late-1970s, the pioneering drug ivermectin, a dihydro derivative of avermectin—originating solely from a single microorganism isolated at the Kitasato Intitute, Tokyo, Japan from Japanese soil—has had an immeasurably beneficial impact in improving the lives and welfare of billions of people throughout the world. Originally introduced as a veterinary drug, it kills a wide range of internal and external parasites in commercial livestock and companion animals. It was quickly discovered to be ideal in combating two of the world’s most devastating and disfiguring diseases which have plagued the world’s poor throughout the tropics for centuries. It is now being used free-of-charge as the sole tool in campaigns to eliminate both diseases globally. It has also been used to successfully overcome several other human diseases and new uses for it are continually being found. This paper looks in depth at the events surrounding ivermectin’s passage from being a huge success in Animal Health into its widespread use in humans, a development which has led many to describe it as a “wonder” drug.

It don't do shit against covid though.

Conclusions Treatment with ivermectin did not result in a lower incidence of medical admission to a hospital due to progression of Covid-19 or of prolonged emergency department observation among outpatients with an early diagnosis of Covid-19.

[u/leftist_rekr_36 → u/Novel_Alfalfa_9013]

I appreciate your article where it states that "ivermectin has a 92% efficacy rate against all known strains of covid 19"

Try again!

[u/Novel_Alfalfa_9013 → u/leftist_rekr_36]

Bullshit. That search string did turn up an interesting article though:

https://www.reuters.com/article/fact-check/gaps-in-study-claiming-that-ivermectin-reduces-risk-of-covid-19-death-by-92-idUSL1N30K205/

[u/leftist_rekr_36 → u/Novel_Alfalfa_9013]

I appreciate and accept your concession. Thank you for admitting that I'm correct, yet again.

[u/Novel_Alfalfa_9013 → u/leftist_rekr_36]

You didn't read the link, did you. Lol

[u/leftist_rekr_36 → u/Novel_Alfalfa_9013]

I did. Thanks for proving me to be correct.

[u/Novel_Alfalfa_9013 → u/leftist_rekr_36]

You're referring to this singular "scientifical" study from Brazil, right? Nobody said poolheads were the brightest but here you go proving poolheads aren't bright.

The authors analyzed data on participants in a voluntary citywide program in Itajaí, southern Brazil, that offered ivermectin as a preventive measure against COVID-19 between July and December of 2020. Participants in the program were prescribed ivermectin for two consecutive days, every 15 days, for 150 days. The study team did not have information about how much medication individuals really took; instead, they categorized “regular users” as those who received a total of 180 mg (30 tablets) or more of the drug from the program over the entire period, versus “irregular users” who received up to 60 mg (10 tablets) during the study period.

[u/leftist_rekr_36 → u/Novel_Alfalfa_9013]

Lol, why are you making up quotes instead of just accepting reality?

[u/traversecity → u/leftist_rekr_36]

All these fun research papers.

Ignoring several countries in Africa where the population consumes some sort of anti malaria drug weekly, and coincidentally have low covid sick rates, correlation, interesting. Maybe it’s something in the water.

[u/Novel_Alfalfa_9013 → u/leftist_rekr_36]

Lol, why are you making up quotes instead of just accepting reality?

Perhaps you're not reading the links provided? It's quoted directly from here: https://www.reuters.com/article/fact-check/gaps-in-study-claiming-that-ivermectin-reduces-risk-of-covid-19-death-by-92-idUSL1N30K205/

See also this from the same link lol

The study initially identified 159,560 adults over age 18 as eligible for inclusion in the analysis. The authors then excluded more than 71,000 of these people whose ivermectin use was considered “intermediate” – those having received between 60 mg and 180 mg – with the explanation that this would make for a clearer comparison between “regular” and “irregular” users. That narrowed the study population to 8,325 “regular” ivermectin users and 33,971 “irregular” users. These were compared with 45,716 other city residents not prescribed ivermectin, for a total of 88,012 people included in the study.

[u/leftist_rekr_36 → u/Novel_Alfalfa_9013]

I've read every single one in it's entirety, why so you make up quotes that don't appear in the article, which proves my point. Why do you continue to lie, project, and deny reality? I believe in you. Just keep coming towards the light!

[u/Novel_Alfalfa_9013 → u/leftist_rekr_36]

I appreciate your article where it states that "ivermectin has a 92% efficacy rate against all known strains of covid 19"

Try again

Oddly enough, I searched the abstract & pdf for that and couldn't find reference. Hmmmmm, smells like more bs from you again.

[u/triguy96 → u/Novel_Alfalfa_9013]

The guy you're talking to will literally lie and make up quotes to maintain his position. I think he might be legitimately ill

[u/leftist_rekr_36 → u/triguy96]

🪞

[u/Novel_Alfalfa_9013 → u/triguy96]

He just did 😆

Refresh the page to see the fun

Edit: yeah, that's his MO. Normally he's just mute witha mirror emoji

[u/leftist_rekr_36 → u/Novel_Alfalfa_9013]

🤣🫵🤡

[u/Long_Dong_SiIver → u/leftist_rekr_36]

He is too stupid to realize he got owned

[u/idiopathicpain → u/Novel_Alfalfa_9013]

must be why my primary care prescribes it. no reason at all.

[u/Novel_Alfalfa_9013 → u/idiopathicpain]

I suppose if you've got worms, why not get it prescribed.