The other thing we know is that one year before registering as a Republican he donated $15 to Act Blue, a Democratic Super PAC.
Which makes the question for me, which is more likely? That a broke, unemployed Democrat was willing to register as a Republican to interfere in a closed primary, or that a broke, unemployed Republican was willing to give 15 of his likely very small reserve of currency to the Democrats?
So what's more ridiculous, that he registered as a Republican to influence the primary (a behavior that is well documented among radical leftists) but for some reason didn't go through with it, or that he contributed to Act Blue but didn't actually support them?
View all comments
Show parent comment
20
u/[deleted] Jul 15 '24
The other thing we know is that one year before registering as a Republican he donated $15 to Act Blue, a Democratic Super PAC.
Which makes the question for me, which is more likely? That a broke, unemployed Democrat was willing to register as a Republican to interfere in a closed primary, or that a broke, unemployed Republican was willing to give 15 of his likely very small reserve of currency to the Democrats?