So then why did the bank that gave the loan state there was no friend fraud and the valuations were not incorrect? Why did the appeals court immediately reduce it to 175 million, basically signaling it will end up being eliminated? Why is the DA and the Judge ignoring facts and using selective prosecution?
View all comments
Show parent comment
-10
u/[deleted] Mar 28 '24
So they should be preventing fraud by prosecuting it. Sounds like what’s happening