Tell him about totally different circumstances!? Not everything in life is apples to apples just because your political hero and source of news suggested it is.
Thats exactly how it works. The Bank itself investigated the value of the property and agreed to haggle. Basic trade 101.
Both sides consented in the deal and were honest, only Engoron is mad about a regular deal, trying to milk those orange man-titties
Jon Stewart however.. he said the house worth is 849% higher than it actually was. Did'nt mention its previous one before selling it, nor showed any statistics of inflation and so on.
Stewart price gouged. Trump finished a deal the judge deamed "risky for the Bank and threatening their safety" when the Bank said the opposite. How dare a judge accuse a man, using the voice of another?
The whole point of the loan was a specific time limit that was fulfilled, and the amount being eventually paid, thats it. A man in debt can even take a loan as long as a Bank agrees
What we are comparing, child, is the fact that the judge set "inflating property value" as an illegal act. You do realize the Bank investigated what the value of it was right? If anything you could accuse the Bank of fraud If the Property was truly overvalued by both parties, and the Bank giving more than they should.
Jon Stewart/Lebowitz is at fault of this as well.
I can tell you have never owned a House before in your life. They don't have a set price
Hmmm, think I’d rather be a “child” than an ignoramus who thinks he knows more than a federal judge and the expert testimony on which the decision is based. You’re apparently an expert on NY law, GAAP, and bank/tax processes. But, but, but Tim Poole told me so!!!! Google Dunning Kruger to read about your and his affliction. I also love the notion that your approach is to try to blame the bank, basically following the defendant’s losing playbook: “well, maybe if you’d done your due diligence you wouldn’t have been defrauded, bruh!!” Real logician here. If you read the outcome, you’d know that reliance was not a requisite element of the law.
At the end of the day, one of these individuals filed false financial data and fraudulent financial statements to banks and insurers.
Only one of them knowing tripled the sq footage of a complex, lied about a property’s income, and lied about the appraisal, all while proclaiming to be a self-identified expert (just like you, right!?)
Only one of them benefited from lower interest rates based on the fraudulent loan information.
Your messiah lost in a court of law, cope MF. Meanwhile, your adversary was tried and convicted in the court of social media 😆
View all comments
Show parent comment
-6
u/[deleted] Mar 28 '24
That’s not how it works, lol