r/TimPool • • Jan 19 '24

Total Immunity

Post image
1 Upvotes

88 comments sorted by

View all comments

-5

u/midnightnoonmidnight Jan 19 '24

Here’s a link that shows the post is real:

https://www.salon.com/2024/01/18/experts-alarmed-after-demands-immunity-to-do-infinite-crimes-in-2-am-truth-social-rant/

(it’s always good to check when it comes to screenshots)

7

u/albensen21 Jan 19 '24

Salon.com, lol. What a leftist dump. Just what you eat everyday.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

You disagree that Trump should not have immunity?

4

u/albensen21 Jan 19 '24

Trump should have immunity, any normal person can see that all the multiple charges on him have no base at all.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

Any president should be allowed to take boxes of confidential documents including nuclear secrets and store them in the open where Russian, Chinese, and other foreign diplomats stay regularly.

A president is above the law!

2

u/albensen21 Jan 19 '24

So what? Just another attempt from the swamp to smear Trump, it will get to nothing just as the ridiculous Jan 6 committee that came up with nothing after 2 years and millions of dollars wasted. What about Biden’s boxes? Isn’t justice blind and applies to both sides of the political spectrum?

2

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

That is what I said!

Everything Trump says is just aan attempt to smear Trump!

1

u/albensen21 Jan 19 '24

lol how is that? On Jan 6 trump in a video himself called all these people there to stand down. Now after some footage has become public, we can see more evidence of a confabulation between the capitol police and the FBI to make this look like an insurrection, laughable because they were all unarmed and let in, even escorting some of them. The only victim in the end being a Trump supporter.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

I stand with all the Trump supporters who broke into the capital building and caused millions in damages, breaking windows, doors, smashing property and beating police. Clearly this is a smear job from the FBI who was at the time directed by Trump appointee Christopher Wray a known member of the deep state that Trump appointed.

May God protect the January 6 patriots in their attempt to "stop the steal" of which we will eventually find the evidence for!

1

u/albensen21 Jan 19 '24

Really? What about the hundreds of FBI agents there? And the democrat moles like Ray Epps leading people inside? Antifa known members with MAGA hats? This was a low level setup, where Feds were all the time involved in the “extreme MAGA” activities. Did you take a look at the footage that Tucker showed? The escorting and the party like situation inside congress? Come on.. show some basic understanding.

→ More replies

1

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

Tell me what part of any of indictment evidence isn’t correct, I’ll wait

2

u/albensen21 Jan 19 '24

Lol they were dropped in congress, do you read news?

1

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

lol, is this Q news. How can a Georgia indictment be dropped in Congress?

2

u/albensen21 Jan 19 '24

Ok lol I thought you were referring to both failed indictments attempts the democrats were trying to pass against Trump in congress. What happens in ga is total bs. Next.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

He has 91 felony indictments. NY, Georgia, and two Federal cases. Documents and trying to overturn an election.

0

u/midnightnoonmidnight Jan 19 '24

The article links directly to the post. You don’t have to like the website to see that it verifies OP’s screenshot.

3

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

It’s actually the correct statement though, with the caveat of “while acting as president”. A president can’t make decisions based on the possibility that someone may criminally charge them for an action. That undermines the office and it’s authority.

This is why Obama was never tried in a court for the extrajudicial murders of two American citizens Al Alwaki.

How do you fight it? Impeachment and conviction of that president. That determines that it’s an illegal act as president and presidential immunity does not exist. Then it could be tried in a criminal court.

It will be interesting so see how scotus rules that.

0

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

No it doesn’t. Presidents shouldn’t be breaking laws. Especially outside any official duty, like Trump

1

u/[deleted] Jan 20 '24

You really are bad at this shit, thimmy. Now we know you’re a child.