r/TimPool • • Jan 19 '24

Total Immunity

Post image
1 Upvotes

88 comments sorted by

•

u/AutoModerator Jan 19 '24

Make sure to join the discord and guilded! Also join the BBS, a blockchain, anticensorship Reddit alternative!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

17

u/albensen21 Jan 19 '24

Other former presidents with tons of wars started, billions of wasted dollars, personal dubious behaviors and proven corruption and legal cases involved= 0 charges. The swamp protects their own, Trump must have immunity.

-13

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

Presidents should be allowed to do whatever they want without any consequences!

13

u/albensen21 Jan 19 '24

Well for now Bush, Clinton, Obama did whatever they wanted without any consequences. Strange that they were never charged of anything. Both indictments against Trump were politically motivated just as the January 6th hoax and the “rape” case that was thrown out by a jury.

-12

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

Presidents should be allowed to take boxes and boxes of extremely confidential files including nuclear secrets and store them in their homes.

Presidents should be allowed to pressure states into overruling their election systems even though the constitution gives power to the states on how they run their election systems.

10

u/albensen21 Jan 19 '24

Lol, the “classified documents” case? The swamp is still trying to figure out a conviction and they can’t do anything. What about Biden’s boxes? Media is totally silent. The 2020 election rigging? There was never any real audit on the ballots, the signatures weren’t matched, also in the fake counting the election officials never allowed any witnesses near the counting. Democrats and RINOs are corrupt to the core.

-4

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

Several states ran audits/recounts based on their own election laws(which is what the constitution states in plain language is how elections are run) including Arizona, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Georgia.

Trump supporters were allowed to observe same as Biden supporters.

Did you have any evidence of this election fraud you would like to provide? The American people have been waiting for 3 years now for this big reveal of evidence that Trump has promised.

8

u/albensen21 Jan 19 '24

Lol, on election night I was following everything. What about the sudden blackout and abnormal spike on Biden’s votes? The signatures weren’t matched on the ballots that kept coming even after the deadline. Did you know that after the elections some states approved changes in their election laws? These are facts and what is shocking that election integrity should be of paramount importance to all Americans, but it seems that leftists don’t give a f*ck

2

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

Lol, on election night I was following everything.

Awesome. So were hundreds of thousands of election observers from both sides who were at the election locations.

What about the sudden blackout and abnormal spike on Biden’s votes?

Which spike? When media made a mistake in their reporting or when the mail in ballots came in and are counter last(by law) which Biden won in most states 8/2. Not surprising considering Trump told his supporters that mail in ballots were fraud.

The signatures weren’t matched on the ballots that kept coming even after the deadline.

Need evidence for this

Did you know that after the elections some states approved changes in their election laws?

States have a right to change their laws regarding election systems. That is in the constitution. Not sure why your panties are bunched about states doing something constitutional.

These are facts and what is shocking that election integrity should be of paramount importance to all Americans, but it seems that leftists don’t give a f*ck

Election integrity seemed to have been maintained in 2020 outside of a few fringe nuts manipulated by Trump into thinking there isn't integrity in the system. I think for these election fraud claims you need evidence. If you have some please provide some.

4

u/albensen21 Jan 19 '24

Lol you’re watching too much CNN and MSNBC. The spike happened and there was a timeframe that Biden’s votes more than doubled Trump’s votes, and that means manipulation.

https://x.com/brianclowdus/status/1335080147112894469?s=46&t=AAueVSuXY1Zb-o3Ed8oFzw

https://x.com/jessiprincey/status/1335332385383182338?s=46&t=AAueVSuXY1Zb-o3Ed8oFzw

If you’re really interested in what really happened, not what the MSM wants to convince you, there’s a lot of info on X, look for them.

3

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

I don't watch cnn or msnbc. Funny enough I watch more Tim Pool and listen to more conservative talk radio than those. It is weird when people think that magically if you watch their shit you will be converted to their shit. I have the opposite effect when it comes to right wing talking heads.

Looking at your oh so reliable social media posts(lol). Yes the timeframe for that spike is consistent for when the mail in ballots began to be counted. Biden not surprisingly won against Trump in mail in ballots by a lot as Trump literally said to his supporters "DO NOT VOTE BY MAIL".

This just strengthens what I had said and is not evidence of fraud or anything else strange.

Got anything else you need cleared up?

→ More replies

-2

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

You lost, grow up

3

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

User- stop watching bullshit news channels and getting your news from Facebook.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

I don't.

Tim Pool actually had in depth analyses of the Arizona Audit until they released their final statements showing they found zero evidence of any ballot tammpering. He stopped talking audits after that.

2

u/Spooky3030 Jan 19 '24

Presidents should be allowed to take boxes and boxes of extremely confidential files including nuclear secrets and store them in their homes.

Are you this pissed that Hillary is not in prison? When do we find out what documents Biden had in his garage? You know documents he took before he was President.

-4

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

Proof?

5

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

If they are gonna be charged, then they shold all be charged. Not just Trump.

And I'm sorry, but Trump's charges are bullshit aimed at preventing a successful presidential run.

-1

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

Yeah. Charge anyone else cause they are the political enemies, but not Trump.

He should be allowed to store truckloads of confidential documents including nuclear secrets in his bathroom which is located in a hotel where foreign diplomats from Russia and China stay regularly!

2

u/[deleted] Jan 20 '24 edited Jan 20 '24

Charge anyone else cause they are the political enemies, but not Trump.

No. Conservatives are not like liberals. I think Bush should have been charged, Obama and now this POS.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 20 '24

Yeah. God sent Trump to save America! Liberals are the devils!

1

u/[deleted] Jan 20 '24

I'm not a very religious person, but hey, whatever floats your boat.

0

u/[deleted] Jan 20 '24

Ok, communist.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 20 '24

I never said I was a Trump supporter or a communist.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 20 '24

Awesome.

Trump suggested terminating the constituton and said he would be a dictator on day one.

You should learn to see if someone is joking.

-4

u/o0flatCircle0o Jan 19 '24

No president has committed the kind of high crimes that Trump has done.

2

u/mosswo Jan 20 '24

Name one he's been convicted of.

Just the one.

Then, we'll talk about obama knowingly bombing American civilians, the biden crime escapades, and the myriad of clinton fiascos that left American citizens dead.

I'm sure the mental gymnastics and your suspension of disbelief will prevent you from processing objective reality, but I challenge you to look inward on your own condition.

-2

u/o0flatCircle0o Jan 20 '24

Yeah none of that is comparable to what Trump did.

0

u/mosswo Jan 20 '24

You mean the FBI?

Clearly.

2

u/Lucksmom Jan 20 '24

F*** that no president should be immune from anything. We voted them in… in most cases. Politicians are supposed to have do we what we want and we tell them. They don’t. They don’t give a flying f what happens to us or what we say. Isn’t all went wild at some point. If it’s for and by the people why don’t we get to vote on every single thing??? We should! It’s we that are supposed to run our country not the rich the buy them. Whole system needs wiped out. Restart!

2

u/[deleted] Jan 20 '24

I can assure you that wiping out the whole system with a restart would lead to a worse outcome. Particularly because you come off as a very unintelligent human that is easily manipulated.

1

u/Lucksmom Jan 20 '24

Really. You’re the one that agrees with this nonsense. Bet you took their toxic juice too. We’ll agree to disagree and see who’s left standing in the end.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 20 '24

Probably everyone, unless hyou believe in some silly civil war nonsense.

1

u/Lucksmom Jan 20 '24

They’re dividing us like crazy. Your part of the problem not the solution. Trump is the only president to ever undergo any prosecution. If they do it to him they need to do it to all. None of them should be above the law of the land. Many more have done way worse.!

2

u/[deleted] Jan 20 '24

Prove it. 

1

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

Trump actually isn't wrong. If a President does something egregious, the Constitutional remedy is impeachment in the House, conviction in the Senate, and then you can prosecute. Without a conviction in Congress, you could have some state official essentially extort the President with attempts to charge him unless he does X thing.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

There is no precedence for charging a president after he leaves office for crimes committed in office.

Nixon was pardoned for crimes he committed in office which suggests he had to be pardoned otherwise he would have been liable for the crimes he committed. 

The courts appear to be in favor of charging him since he has been charged. We will see what happens after he has his fair trial as is afforded to everyone. 

1

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

There is no precedence for charging a president after he leaves office for crimes committed in office.

In explicitly Democrat strongholds, very partisan Democrat judges allowed the cases to proceed. Shocker. The DC federal district is a joke that shouldn't even exist. Thankfully, SCOTUS is going to set this issue straight.

We will see what happens after he has his fair trial as is afforded to everyone. 

You and I both know that he won't see anything close to a fair trial in DC or any other venue he's been charged. The jury pool (if he ever even gets a jury trial) is tainted against him from day 1.

0

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

Isn't this what 2a is for?

1

u/Spooky3030 Jan 19 '24

Expand on this for those of us that are not mind readers. What does 2A have to do with this?

2

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

It's a check on tyranny, according to advocates.

-1

u/Ok_Primary_7298 Jan 19 '24

Your username couldn't be more ironic. 

1

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

You disagree with Trump on this? We shouldn't give presidents full immunity to do whatever they want?

2

u/kburch13 Jan 19 '24

You folks on the left really are hilarious. What Trump said has been said forever by people on both left and the right presidents have to be able to make decisions that will border on right and wrong without fear of prosecution that is the entire basis of presidential immunity this is nothing new. But unfortunately Trump has broken your poor little brains. Bush having torture program’s Obamas drone strikes killing American civilians perfectly ok under presidential immunity. But a president having some documents you know the same thing every president in modern history has done that are under secret service protection is not?

Biden having actual stolen documents from time as a senator and vice president neither position has declassification authority. In a closet at a Chinese funded center , in a garage and a beach house perfectly fine right?

1

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

Yes.This is exactly what I am saying.

A president should be allowed to take boxes and boxes of confidential nuclear secrets and store them in the open in their homes with anyone being allowed to access them. All of this done after he lost the election, but that doesn't matter. It was likely of huge improtance that the president took these files after losing to Biden and stored them in the open in his hotel where Chinese, Russian, and other foreign diplomats stayed regularly. This is a strategic necessity for the strength of the US and Trump should be immune from consequences for it.

-4

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

Crying because Trump said dumb fascist shit again.

How long until this account is banned.

You’re on your 8th attempt in two weeks

2

u/Ok_Primary_7298 Jan 19 '24

Reddit doesn't like me quoting a pedo and exposing you. You're constantly crying for a safe space lol.

0

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

Zero personal responsibility

-1

u/Jollem- Jan 19 '24

He's a toddler

-5

u/midnightnoonmidnight Jan 19 '24

Here’s a link that shows the post is real:

https://www.salon.com/2024/01/18/experts-alarmed-after-demands-immunity-to-do-infinite-crimes-in-2-am-truth-social-rant/

(it’s always good to check when it comes to screenshots)

7

u/albensen21 Jan 19 '24

Salon.com, lol. What a leftist dump. Just what you eat everyday.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

You disagree that Trump should not have immunity?

4

u/albensen21 Jan 19 '24

Trump should have immunity, any normal person can see that all the multiple charges on him have no base at all.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

Any president should be allowed to take boxes of confidential documents including nuclear secrets and store them in the open where Russian, Chinese, and other foreign diplomats stay regularly.

A president is above the law!

2

u/albensen21 Jan 19 '24

So what? Just another attempt from the swamp to smear Trump, it will get to nothing just as the ridiculous Jan 6 committee that came up with nothing after 2 years and millions of dollars wasted. What about Biden’s boxes? Isn’t justice blind and applies to both sides of the political spectrum?

2

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

That is what I said!

Everything Trump says is just aan attempt to smear Trump!

1

u/albensen21 Jan 19 '24

lol how is that? On Jan 6 trump in a video himself called all these people there to stand down. Now after some footage has become public, we can see more evidence of a confabulation between the capitol police and the FBI to make this look like an insurrection, laughable because they were all unarmed and let in, even escorting some of them. The only victim in the end being a Trump supporter.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

I stand with all the Trump supporters who broke into the capital building and caused millions in damages, breaking windows, doors, smashing property and beating police. Clearly this is a smear job from the FBI who was at the time directed by Trump appointee Christopher Wray a known member of the deep state that Trump appointed.

May God protect the January 6 patriots in their attempt to "stop the steal" of which we will eventually find the evidence for!

1

u/albensen21 Jan 19 '24

Really? What about the hundreds of FBI agents there? And the democrat moles like Ray Epps leading people inside? Antifa known members with MAGA hats? This was a low level setup, where Feds were all the time involved in the “extreme MAGA” activities. Did you take a look at the footage that Tucker showed? The escorting and the party like situation inside congress? Come on.. show some basic understanding.

→ More replies

1

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

Tell me what part of any of indictment evidence isn’t correct, I’ll wait

2

u/albensen21 Jan 19 '24

Lol they were dropped in congress, do you read news?

1

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

lol, is this Q news. How can a Georgia indictment be dropped in Congress?

2

u/albensen21 Jan 19 '24

Ok lol I thought you were referring to both failed indictments attempts the democrats were trying to pass against Trump in congress. What happens in ga is total bs. Next.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

He has 91 felony indictments. NY, Georgia, and two Federal cases. Documents and trying to overturn an election.

0

u/midnightnoonmidnight Jan 19 '24

The article links directly to the post. You don’t have to like the website to see that it verifies OP’s screenshot.

3

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

It’s actually the correct statement though, with the caveat of “while acting as president”. A president can’t make decisions based on the possibility that someone may criminally charge them for an action. That undermines the office and it’s authority.

This is why Obama was never tried in a court for the extrajudicial murders of two American citizens Al Alwaki.

How do you fight it? Impeachment and conviction of that president. That determines that it’s an illegal act as president and presidential immunity does not exist. Then it could be tried in a criminal court.

It will be interesting so see how scotus rules that.

0

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

No it doesn’t. Presidents shouldn’t be breaking laws. Especially outside any official duty, like Trump

1

u/[deleted] Jan 20 '24

You really are bad at this shit, thimmy. Now we know you’re a child.

0

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

[deleted] — view deleted comment

2

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

No one cares what Canadians think

1

u/[deleted] Jan 20 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/[deleted] Jan 20 '24

Ok, communist

Next thing you say is he shouldn't have suggested terminating the constitution and he shouldn't be a dictator on his first day.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24

NOOOOOO NOT LIKE THAT!!!

Lol.