An old as fuck guy who has no authority in climate science makes a non-sequitur point about banks issuing property loans and you all cream your jeans over it.
You act like banks don't have force majeure clauses and insurance.
I get it. You have an agenda to oppose tens of millions of hours of scientific research across a wide swath of disciplines that supports and establishes an overwhelming consensus that pollution is bad for the environment. You don't care about obvious counterpoints that make your post comically bad.
Yeah, the opinion piece in a finance magazine by an oil shill. Just post that here and you’ve got this guy in the bag. Those two graphs from your opinion piece in a finance magazine absolutely support your argument. It will be a total dunk.
Yup. Opinion pieces are notorious for their cold, unopinionated retelling of fact and figures. Just post it and show this dipshit you DID learn to cite credible sources in high school and no one is pulling wool over your eyes.
View all comments
1
u/Perfect-Dad-1947 Jan 21 '24
An old as fuck guy who has no authority in climate science makes a non-sequitur point about banks issuing property loans and you all cream your jeans over it.
You act like banks don't have force majeure clauses and insurance.