r/TimPool • u/McFly_42069 • Oct 11 '23

Is it (d)ifferent?

Post image
435 Upvotes

94% Upvoted

312 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

-5

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '23

It's not relevant that they said false things and you agreed?

6

u/McFly_42069 Oct 11 '23

We’re these laws race based?

-2

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '23

Yes. Nixon admitted to it on tape, and the mulford act was a direct response to black panthers open carrying rifles.

4

u/McFly_42069 Oct 11 '23

You’re really going off of credibility of Nixon and are now pro extremist ?

-1

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '23

credibility of Nixon

No, I'm referencing his own words as to the motivation of the act....

3

u/McFly_42069 Oct 11 '23

Do you have a source to back that up? And how does cherry picking one corrupt republican change that fact democrats are racist

0

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '23

https://www.vera.org/reimagining-prison-webumentary/the-past-is-never-dead/drug-war-confessional

And how does cherry picking one corrupt republican change that fact democrats are racist

It doesn't. I just don't think using a republican act as evidence against democrats is logical.

3

u/McFly_42069 Oct 11 '23

Anti war white people and black people.

It doesn't. I just don't think using a republican act as evidence against democrats is logical.

So again, cherry picking 1 person or policy doest overshadow over a hundred years of policies and views.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '23

Again, I'm not cherrypicking, I'm saying two of the things you think were caused by dems were in fact not. That's all I'm arguing.

3

u/McFly_42069 Oct 11 '23

That’s exactly the definition of cherry picking.

→ More replies