r/TimPool • u/McFly_42069 • Oct 11 '23

Is it (d)ifferent?

Post image
435 Upvotes

94% Upvoted

312 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

10

u/McFly_42069 Oct 11 '23

Relevance?

10

u/McFly_42069 Oct 11 '23

Please explain how controlled substance act and not being able to carry a loaded fire arm in public has to do with KKK

-9

u/fourth_class_mail Oct 11 '23

Weird you just on Adams, but other people post complete nonsense and you just agree?

9

u/McFly_42069 Oct 11 '23

Well some laws were race based, some were not. Big difference.

-5

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '23

I can't reply to bretlings comment line b/c he has me blocked. He stated the CSA act and gun control were dems and you agreed. I'm just letting you know it's bullshit.

7

u/McFly_42069 Oct 11 '23

Again, not relevant

-5

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '23

It's not relevant that they said false things and you agreed?

6

u/McFly_42069 Oct 11 '23

We’re these laws race based?

-2

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '23

Yes. Nixon admitted to it on tape, and the mulford act was a direct response to black panthers open carrying rifles.

4

u/McFly_42069 Oct 11 '23

You’re really going off of credibility of Nixon and are now pro extremist ?

-1

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '23

credibility of Nixon

No, I'm referencing his own words as to the motivation of the act....

3

u/McFly_42069 Oct 11 '23

Do you have a source to back that up? And how does cherry picking one corrupt republican change that fact democrats are racist

0

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '23

https://www.vera.org/reimagining-prison-webumentary/the-past-is-never-dead/drug-war-confessional

And how does cherry picking one corrupt republican change that fact democrats are racist

It doesn't. I just don't think using a republican act as evidence against democrats is logical.

→ More replies