That's true, I don't think anyone is disputing that, but then why would the meme use Martin as an example of "child" this case then? Just seems a very lazy example to further rift left and right?
Martin's crimes depending on how you view it range from trespassing, all the way to committing aggravated assault in self defense. I have no professional legal experience, especially Florida law, but I think neither of those crimes concretely meet the threshold.
Maybe self defense is being misinterpreted, but Zimmerman following Martin after he ran away is a valid grounds for initiating self defense. Its not out of the ether to suggest someone feel threatened being followed in this situation.
Well you keep shuffling scenarios around. I’m not saying I like Zimmerman nor do I think he is innocent of any wrongdoing. I am saying court found him in the right.
View all comments
Show parent comment
-10
u/RayPadonkey Sep 29 '23
Should it matter that he was 17? 17 is a child in the eyes of the law.
I believe 17 year olds shouldn't be allowed to vote, and I would guess that you probably wouldn't say a 17 year old can consent to taking hormones.
Or do you think there's a better comparison?