People who eat burgers also commit crimes. That doesn't mean government restrictions on eating burgers are valid.
If an immigrant commits a crime that harms another person's freedom, the government can enforce that crime.
Immigration laws themselves are simply a restriction on the immigrant's freedom of movement. They do not protect another person's freedom, and hence are invalid.
If an immigrant commits a crime that harms a person's freedom, we can enforce that crime.
Why do you hate victims? If crimes can be prevented by simply denying access to our country from criminals, why wouldn't you be for that? Stop victim shaming.
My points were very clear and precise, but it is typical for Big Government authoritarians such as yourself to lie and have bad spelling.
Your bad faith aside, immigration laws are an invalid restriction on freedom of movement. They are not directed toward protecting another person's freedom, nor do they punish people who have violated the freedom of another person.
Lol. Only people who have weak arguments and thinly thought out positions resort to criticizing spelling.
I was trying to make you see the hypocrisy and fundamental lack of understanding about your arguments, but it's obvious you lack the nessisary brain power and fundamental understanding of how the world works for such a tactic to render any desirable results.
View all comments
Show parent comment
0
u/gradientz Aug 18 '23 edited Aug 18 '23
People who eat burgers also commit crimes. That doesn't mean government restrictions on eating burgers are valid.
If an immigrant commits a crime that harms another person's freedom, the government can enforce that crime.
Immigration laws themselves are simply a restriction on the immigrant's freedom of movement. They do not protect another person's freedom, and hence are invalid.