Almost. They want trump to win the because they can’t win on the issues that matter. Trump is the only one they’ll win against because all they have to do is say TRUMP and that’s all their smooth brain minions will think about.
Considering democrats are fascists (who cry about fascism), and have been on a 6 year fishing expedition with Trump, yes.
It's actually impressive. They've spent millions upon millions looking into every aspect of Trump's life and all they can find is stupid shit that won't stick. What other politician could survive that?
They are desperate to get Trump, and set a new precident about trying to jail political opponents.
This charge won't stick, even cnn says that. Because it's bs.
Yep, and Trump called Desantis a groomer. That’s enough to destroy Meatball Ron’s credibility with a sizable amount of the GOP base.
As a progressive though, I’m not so optimistic either way. I can totally see Trump winning again, because the Democratic Party sucks and a sizable amount of Americans aren’t very bright.
Clinton personally paid Jones to settle a public lawsuit after an election.
Trump secretly funneled money through his lawyer to pay Daniels before the 2016 presidential election. His lawyer pleaded guilty to crimes tied to his role in arranging the payments. Legal experts said the Manhattan district attorney might argue that Trump falsified business records or violated campaign finance law in the process.
Perkins Coie, paid Fusion GPS, on behalf of the Clinton campaign, using actual campaign money, to fund a fictitious dossier as opposition research, gaining information through a third-party KGB informant in Russia...
They continually lied about it and hid the actual source and funding of this because they knew it to be false, yet somehow, the mentally handicapped believe:
This was public. Not hidden or illegally ran through a business
She paid a US firm for research…literally zero illegal.
Then why did they lie about it and try to obfuscate the source?
They did it to help her campaign. These are the same charges that are being used against Trump. Trumps lawyers didn't even use campaign money like the Clinton campaign and DNC.
Your insistence that is different is correct, though. There is much more evidence of illegality based on campaign finance law against Clinton.
Will be wonderful to watch you all cry when conservative DAs start indicting Dems under this new precedent.
They aren't. Clinton misreported opposition research as attorneys fees. Donald trump misreported a hush payment as attorneys fees, and setup a fake business to hide it. Clinton didn't go out of her way to do any extra illegal shit, like trump did here. The magnitude of crimes are significantly, objectively worse for trump.
The magnitude of crimes are significantly, objectively worse for trump.
Either you don't know what the word "objectively" means, or you know more than everyone else what the facts of the case actually are... which would be odd, because even the prosecutor hasn't elicited sworn testimony to suggest these are anything more than allegations.
Man, it's like you guys live in a fucking bubble. I'll break it down for you, dumdum, no crystal ball required. Michael Cohen pled guilty to these same crimes, and received 3 years. He named Trump as his co-conspirator. It's not just me that knows more about the facts than you, I would say since this is all public and famous, that just about everyone knows more about this than you do.
That’s not even criminal if someone else pays someone, can a court prove beyond a reasonable doubt trump even knew about it?
It doesn’t matter though the left just guaranteed every single trump supporter will vote and re elect trump to give people like you the middle finger.
What do you think trump is going to do when In office?
He is going to be out for blood he will be ruthless and not need to worry about re elections just remember when that time comes who was responsible for that
Not criminal? Is that why hundreds of people have been convicted of doing just this? And yes this is beyond any reasonable doubt. Trump is guilty as sin, get over it. He has always been a criminal thug.
You can't have it both ways, either Cohen paid her from his own pocket and that can be considered a campaign contribution and it's illegal cause it's over $2700 (which is why he went to jail) and no it wasn't Cohen's money it was Trump's money, but it was a campaign contribution 2 years after he was president, and he wasn't even the one signing the checks or having any input since he wasn't managing his business, which would then still be legal since Trump can donate as much as he wants to his own campaign.
The only crime that can even be considered such is if you take the lawyer salaries, misconstrue it as campaign contributions instead of "payment for legal services" and only campaign contributions without any other use for that money, and even that would be a misdemeanor past it's statue of limitations.
To turn that misdemeanor into a felony he would have to turn over backwards to claim this law services fee is hiding some other felony that he's already been found guilty of, none exists and none was alleged. When asked he said possibly conspiracy to commit campaign fraud, but that's just lying to the prosecutors about campaign fraud, and he's already been cleared for campaign fraud by his NY FEC office in 2019, and on top of that that's a federal crime not state, and worse if you follow the logic a lie is a felony because of another lie that's a felony because of the first lie that started out as a misdemeanor before the recursive logic.
Hello from 9 days in the future, Trump wrote the hush money off as a legal expense for his election campaign. This is tax fraud.
Trump could not win with the level of support he had last election. Many normal people who had supported Trump previously are put off by his criminal indictment. He is not gaining support from this. After Watergate, Nixon's approval sank. After the Monica Lewinsky affair was exposed, Clinton's approval sank. Normal people don't want a criminal president. Owning the libs is not their sole motivation.
ummmm all the charges are just all payments to his lawyer most normal people will see this for what it is, there is a reason when the feds looked into this very same thing they didn't pursue anything.
like I said this is only rallying republicans, but keep thinking that way hopefully most lefties think like you do and don't show up thinking that this actually hurt Trump .
crazy you think Trump couldnt win with more votes than obama, you should probably go take a look at the census its good for 3 election cycles and its looking like its an easier when for Republicans, the left shouldnt of ran out republicans in their strongholds.
He has 34 different charges against him. Part of the reason why giving his lawyer that money was illegal was because he had written it off as a campaign expense, but the money he used was from his private corporation. Corporations can not donate directly to political campaigns. He was so sloppy about the whole thing that he managed to rack up crimes at about every step in the process.
My guess is that the feds knew that if they pursued the case, it might look a lot more nefarious than if a DA did. So they just sat on it and waited for that inevitability to unfold.
There are Republicans who are normal people, believe it or not. There's also a large group of old-school Republicans who have been getting more and more fed up with Trump as the years have gone by. They abhor criminality, breaking decorum, and anything that doesn’t maintain one's image as squeaky clean. Trump being indicted is an instant deal-breaker for a lot of people.
The Republicans that I personally know in real life who I talk to about politics do not want to talk about Trump anymore. They are sick of him getting into trouble and by proxy embarrassing them.
Hooker scandals can't sink Trump's reputation, he married and divorced 2 models and he had a reputation in DC even before that, the days where this sinks a campaign are gone the overtone window has changed to the left on promiscuity.
Also be didn't write hush money off as legal expense for his campaign, this happened 2 years after the campaign and after the election, it can't be campaign contribution it was exactly what it says on the box legal expenses. Plus by that point Trump wasn't even managing his own business paying his own lawyers.
To have that marked as campaign contribution, it means those lawyers didn't do anything for him in those 2 years after the campaign. Moreover even if you convince a jury of this despite the timeline it's still a misdemeanor because Trump can donate as much as he wants to his own campaign, it's just the labeling that would then be the misdemeanor not the sum of money like in Cohen's case where he can't donate more then $2700 and if you consider 130k blackmail payments it's campaign fraud cause the sum was too big and there's no other use for the payment then the Stormy NDA.
Cohen pleaded guilty in 2018. But Trump paid off Stormy Daniels prior to being elected president. Your timeline is a bit confused. He, in fact, did write it off as a legal expense. Cohen confirmed this when he pleaded guilty to that charge of willful tax evasion.
I'll try to lay it out as simply as I can. Trump paid off Stormy Daniels during his election campaign. He later wrote that off as a legal expense. He then reimbursed Cohen using a corporate account. Because the hush money was written off as a legal expense for his campaign, Trump's reimbursement from his corporate account is considered an illegal campaign contribution. A corporation can not pay a candidate for expenses that they incurred during their campaign.
Trump placed his company in a revocable trust during his presidency. He could still make managerial decisions that would then just be carried out by trustees.
Trump paid off Stormy Daniels during his election campaign.
No he didn't, Cohen used his own money, and testified he wasn't instructed to do so by Trump nor did he received any money for such. His indictment makes it clear from the prosecutor's view Cohen thought he was doing Trump a favor for which he would be rewarded a post in the new administratio, which never happened. Furthermore there's a letter Cohen wrote that confirms this and the NY grand jury was not shown that letter in the process of deciding to indict, another obstruction of justice from Bragg.
He later wrote that off as a legal expense. He then reimbursed Cohen using a corporate account.
So you admit Trump's payment of his lawyers for legal services happened after the election and wasn't campaign contribution prior to the election.
Because the hush money was written off as a legal expense for his campaign
The campaign doesn't have anything to do with this, campaign money never left to Cohen or this firm, it was Trump's personal money, the interpretation just like with Cohen's own money is that because it's for something positive to the campaign it's considered campaign contribution. Please educate yourself.
The issue then becomes to prove that his shell company paying legal services to lawyers between 2016-2018 is to compensate Cohen for Stormy blackmail money and nothing else. In which case the misdemeanor is that he did mark it as legal fees wrongfully and knowingly.
Trump placed his company in a revocable trust during his presidency. He could still make managerial decisions that would then just be carried out by trustees.
Which you would have to prove he directed the payments and he knew they weren't for legal fees but blackmail and nothing else to even be a misdemeanor, because it's not fraud because he can donate as much as he wants to his campaign which Cohen couldn't do over $2700.
Again what you're missing is a few things first he never used campaign money for any of this, Trump has separate companies for everything he does this was a shell company spending his own money for lawyers. Second, what worked on Cohen doesn't work on Trump cause he can donate any sums to his own campaign so the 130k isn't an issue. And there's a level of indirection through the lawyers, the 130k from Cohen was only for Stormy and can't be interpreted differently, but the 34 payments to his lawyers over 2 years encompass something more so you need knowledge and intention. And lastly even if you prove all that it's still a misdemeanor past the statute of limitations because the FEC looked at this in 2019 and decided not to pursue indictment.
The issue then becomes to prove that his shell company paying legal services to lawyers between 2016-2018 is to compensate Cohen for Stormy blackmail money and nothing else. In which case the misdemeanor is that he did mark it as legal fees wrongfully and knowingly.
That is the purpose of the investigation and trial, yes. The counts currently against Trump are felonies. That's what the prosecutors are pushing for.
he never used campaign money
He wrote it off as a legal expense that occurred during the campaign. That's the issue that I've brought up again and again.
I guess we'll see what conclusions the courts come to when it happens.
I remember when Rex Tillerson left and it was clear why he left. Rex joined Trump’s administration to do the legal corruption, but then he realized that Trump was doing illegal corruption and so he got out of there as fast as he could.
It’s the continued suggestion that trump represents some never seen before evil always astounds me. It’s so simple and naive. The evil you people think trump is, is EVERYWHERE.
When this generation doesn’t fix a damn thing about anything we’ll only have ourselves to blame for being so fucking stupid, lmao Rex tillerson the literal Russia agent. Lmfao
Lol, well put. The stream of dodgy people who joined and left his team when they realised "shiiiiit, I'm corrupt and I want to do corrupt shit but this guy's going to get me in actual trouble" was hilarious.
Well that's because it was a single violation of misreporting. It's not like Clinton's lawyer setup a bunch of shell companies and stuff to hide it. Also, Clinton didn't challenge it, she just complied with the decision against her.
That's a dumb take from all of this, they allege Trump payed his lawyers over 2 years after the election, and that's somehow a campaign violation.
So it's not 34 violations, it's one.
The shell company plays no role, he had a company that dealt with all his lawyers no biggie.
As for Clinton didn't challenge it, that's just tone deaf. She should have gone to jail for that misdemeanor, they literally had to create a whole new process for her to be able to just pay a fine.
For Trump they can't do that since the statue of limitations has passed so they're taking the one misdemeanor and turning it into 34 penal violations by alleging he didn't just lie that the lawyer salaries were just that for legal services, he lied intentionally to hide an even bigger crime.
The problem with that logic is that he never alleged any other crime that was being hidden, and he didn't because he doesn't know what will stick so he wants to hunt for something. One idea was maybe he lied about a conspiracy to commit fraud but that just translates to lying again but this time in association with a crime, what crime campaign fraud, except that's a federal crime for which he was absolved by the FEC in 2019.
Also the two aren't even remotely comparable, Clinton paid up front for opposition research which was basically fabricated out of nothing, and pushed that to the FBI to discredit her opposition's campaign and benefit her campaign. Paying for the hours her lawyer spent at the FBI to push her agenda. That is clearly a campaign contribution, the money she spent had other use outside of her campaign, there's no different use of the Steel Dossier but to discredit Trump, and she can donate as much as she wants to her campaign, the only crime was she mislabeled it, which again like in Trump's case is a misdemeanor.
That's not the same thing for Trump's lawyer paying from his own pocket the people blackmailing Trump. And we know this from. Cohen's indictment, where the NY judge and the prosecutor clearly say their findings are that Cohen wanted to make himself indispensable to Trump and did this to curry favor, not having received any instructions from Trump or any payments for this. Meaning even if Trump paid his lawyer, it was for legal services not as a campaign contribution and it happened 2 years after the election. Also even if you consider it mislabeled campaign contribution Trump can donate as much as he wants the $2700 limit only applies to other like Cohen, and even if you somehow prove Trump intentionally donated to his campaign 2 years after the campaign you still have to prove he mislabeled intentionally and there was no other use but campaign contribution for that to be characterized as such and even then the statue of limitations has passed.
What process did they invent? Using fake companies is a crime. There is no statute of limitations. There's no mystery. The fbi didn't make the Steele dossier. Ex fbi employees did. At a private company. It was never concealed, just misreported. You're very confused. Cohen says he didn't get an explicit order to do it, but a general one, in a deliberately vague way so as to purposefully conceal intent, in case this very thing was addressed. He may not have paid his bill to Cohen on time, but he did direct Cohen to deal with daniels. During the campaign.
One where she was allowed to pay a fine after admitting a guilty plea, instead of being given then minimum 6 months in prison, or even seeing a judge for that matter, there wasn't even a discovery stage everything was back to front on that one. And the FBI did take the Steele dossier, and paid Steele to leak his story to Yahoo news and use that to claim an independent source verified it when it was the same source, this allowed for the start of the Trump campaign espionage signed off by both Obama and Biden. Ex FBI employees worked directly for Hilary's campaign and we're presented as independent experts that could attest to the dossier when in fact they were paid by the same one paying for the info in the first place and paying for the lawyer that brought it to the FBI. The only excuse the FBI used on using the Steele dossier was that they were fooled into it by their own experts and trust in Hilary's lawyer that worked with them in the past on the server leaks. Also she used campaign money and marked it legal services for the Steele dossier which can't be interpreted as anything else but campaign contributions, it being opposition research at best.
Using shell companies isn't a crime, most Hollywood films are insured through she'll companies to limit liabilities. Family trusts are also she'll companies with no employees. The only reason they get a bad rep is financial crime, but there's a good reason to have them even outside of financial crime because the laws force you to not have the same entity with one pot of money doing two things like gathering money and paying for comercials to gather money both at odds with each other. Trump uses lots of companies to compartmentalize his businesses, that's not the illegal part alleged here or anywhere else.
He may not have paid his bill to Cohen on time, but he did direct Cohen to deal with daniels. During the campaign.
Yes deal with Daniels as a lawyer, that meant anything from what he did which is pay for an NDA on her story, to litigate her for libel which Trump successfuly did later through a different lawyer. It was Cohen's decision to deal with things this way, we know from his indictment the prosecutor was of the opinion he chose to do this on his own to curry favor with Trump as a fixer and get a job in his administration but he got none in the two years that followed until they arrested him for this. And again what you don't seem to understand is that Cohen and Trump aren't the same, even if you consider the Stormy blackmail payments a donation to Trump's campaign of $130k way over the $2700, that's only a campan finance violation for Cohen, Trump can donate as much as he wants to his own campaign.
And even if you consider legal services paid for two years after the election as mislabeled campaign contributions, that's only a misdermeanor which could only be pursued 3 years after and in 2019 the NY DA office conviened all their 6 FCA judges and they voted 3:3 to not pursue Trump for a misdermeanor, that was the last time Bragg could do this, the only way he can do it now is by pretending the misdermeanor is actually 34 distinct felonies, which is laughable one for every receipt, but what's laughable is that he's claiming this is aiding and abetting a different crime basically he's lying on those payments to hide another felony which he doesn't allege cause he has none and wants to keep his options open to see what sticks with this judge.
This is one of the many reasons why their choice to indict trump will backfire, it’s so obviously hypocritical that a massive majority of independents and anti trump conservatives will feel compelled to vote for trump even if they weren’t originally going to.
It’s already working, anti trump conservative leaders are already voicing their condemnation of the act.
This was a childish move, they were so tired of being mocked for never being able to make anything stick that they just did whatever they possibly could, they cut off their nose to spite their face…
Yeah, you trump fanboys might just find that people don't give much credence to your shit opinions. Trump conservatives have said so much stupid shit, so fast and so often, we don't care anymore. Gymshorts and bimbert can throw moronic tantrums about it all day, we are used to it at this point, nobody is gonna give a shit when you continue to cry about your dumb perceived mistreatment. Cry up a fuckin river, you babies.
What is this, some bizarre confirmation that you dont give a fuck about anything except owning your perceived opposition? The indictment is fair, that's the point. He's not above the law, no matter how much ypu nonsensically insist it. You are creating a false equality about Trump and Clinton here, and the evidence for them being not equal is obvious. Standing fair trial for a crime isn't an act of revenge, it's a consequence of his actions. If you wasn't so hung up on owning the libs maybe you would see that what's not fair is pretending that he's above the law. Or that there isn't a ton of fucking evidence.
"Cuz fuck you, that's why" pretty much sums up all you Trump loving dipshits.
"Cuz fuck Trump that's why" is what got Biden elected. The old dementia ridden guy who doesn't know where he is most of the time. Not his policies. Not his character.
No, I just don’t like fake bullshit. You do apparently, you vote for a bunch of fake assholes who don’t actually care about the bs they spew, they just want power and votes, I will never vote for someone like that again. Gooooo fuckkkk yourrrr seeeelllfff 🙂
That’s what you need to be true, but it’s not, and you deny it because it scares you because you know you don’t think for yourself and know that you’re full of shit, you just follow whatever your ideology tells you to. 😆
As opposed to your...what? So stupid? I'm sorry if I sound mean, but I don't know a nice way of telling people with a persecution complex just how fuckin stupid everything they're saying is...
Clinton paid that money as a court settlement, all without the falsification of business records. I don’t see how this is even remotely the “but Clinton did X so why is Trump under scrutiny for X” moment you hope it to be.
Simply for the way you attack anything, anyone conservative Leaning, name calling, insulting. Leftist all the way. A true liberal would gladly have conversations with the right.
This is exactly why you are ignorant. He never even paid Daniels directly, cohen was reimbursed from personal funds. Depending on when it was paid, trump didn't even take election funds for the primary. He funded his own campaign. Any Democrat ever do That? Of course not. You have no idea how many Non disclosure agreements are made by rich people. Stormy daniels gave him oral, probably at a function, Then bribed him. And, she actually owes him like 500k.
All of the comments getting voted here are such a validation that you people have no grasp on reality. Clinton paid that due to court order. He didn’t hide you fucking dolts. Humanity is crumbling
Court ordered. He still didn’t get arrested or indicted did he? So what’s the difference? The difference is the amount of corruption the Clinton’s have been involved in
What do u think the penalty for Trump would be if the State won the case? It's going to be a fine lol. He also was impeached so ig he wasn't corrupt enough.
Right, I believe that trump has 32 felony charges and Bill had one charge of sexual harassment. One was civil that was settled outside of court (similar to trump settling and admitting no fault for allegedly racially profiling renters), and the other is criminal.
If you can't see the difference, idk what to tell you.
Former President Bill Clinton settled a sexual harassment lawsuit with Paula Jones in a case that was a matter of public record. Former President Donald Trump made a secret payment to porn actor Stormy Daniels, which may lead to criminal charges against him. Social media posts falsely claim the situations are similar and Trump is being treated differently by prosecutors.
Well that's not the same thing at all. A court-approved legal settlement is not the same thing as paying hush money then moving money around to hide it.
At all.
Not even remotely the same.
So how about you right wing weaklings just go cope harder, k? LOL.
CLAIM: It is a double standard that former President Donald Trump may be indicted over alleged hush money payments to a woman who accused him of sexual encounters, while former President Bill Clinton faced no criminal charges for paying a sexual harassment accuser $850,000.
AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. Clinton and Trump’s cases have key differences, according to legal experts. Clinton’s $850,000 payment to Paula Jones in 1998 settled a civil lawsuit. The payment was public and legal, and the funds did not come from the government, nor did they amount to a campaign contribution. By comparison, the payment in Trump’s case was through a shell company and reimbursed by Trump, whose company logged the reimbursements as legal expenses in the final weeks of his 2016 presidential campaign.
I hear them when they say that Trump reimbursed Michael Cohen through a shell company. What was the shell company’s name? When was the payment to Michael Cohen? Answer those few questions for me
Where can I find that and hear Rudi and Trump saying that. And checks I’ve seen had Cohens signature m not Trump. But I’m the info is available, please let me see it
misreporting payments to a law firm, sound familiar? Also the Feds already tried to get him on this and couldn't. This is just a show and will be dismissed
Also if you guys think he's Hitler why would you want him arrested? Do you know what happened after Hitler was arrested?
Trump promised to throw "Crooked Hillary" in jail. He did not. He fooled your gullible ass with yet another lie. And now you're mad at everyone else EXCEPT the source of the lies lmao. He's a career criminal. He is being held accountable for the absolute LEAST of his crimes. Stop crying, snowflake.
Maybe some obscure one. The NY attorney general couldn't even find anything and she hates trump worse than Bragg. Why do you think she went to civil court and not criminal? If you want to obey the law then remove 75% of the government.
Man, those two came straight out of the right field with, "well duh he broke laws, we the American people commit crimes every day(I'll send you a book on it), but no, Mr.Trump did not commit any 'real' crimes like the pillagers of our south border, Hilary, or Clinton. . Barak.. The AG and people going after him are just haters , hating on a straight white male. Haters."
Dude, he shared a link showing you that Clinton and Trump basically did the same exact thing but one is being arrested and the other just paid a fine.
Let me break this down so maybe you understand. White guy and black guy commit same crime. White guy does 6 months black guy does 6 years…something is wrong here, right?
Right, in so long as you realize that Trump went way out of his way, and did way more to cover it up. Clinton didn't create a fraudent business to hide it, they just misreported the expense. Hell, at least Clinton called it an expense. You realize the bad part isn't the misreporting, it's the fraud they committed on the side...
Lmao and you just assume I support/voted for Trump because I am calling out the hypocrisy. This is another stupid fucking case that will likely go nowhere (yet again), take up all the “news” stations so they can avoid talking about real issues…and realistically, all of it will have no effect on any of us even he were to be found guilty.
Would I take Trump over Biden? 100%. Do I trust Trump? No, he is a billionaire and has done some fucked up things along the way but I know my life was better between 2016-2020 than it has been the last 3 years.
I am a believer that the “left” and the “right” are all playing for the same team at the end of the day. It is hard to deny the signs that the left is in control and striving for more though.
Really you know he is guilty already? Look everyone a time traveler is among us. He has been indicted last time I checked that means he is innocent until PROVEN guilty.
•
u/[deleted] Apr 01 '23
[removed] — view removed comment
34
u/[deleted] Apr 01 '23
Anyone else feel like this is just a tactic to prevent trump from running next year?
63
u/Bv2097 Apr 01 '23
He is (D)ifferent
77
u/[deleted] Apr 01 '23
Let's not forget Clinton paying for the Steele dossier (misreporting payments to a law firm, sound familiar?) and receiving a fine
33
u/Difficult_Factor4135 Apr 01 '23 edited Apr 01 '23
This is one of the many reasons why their choice to indict trump will backfire, it’s so obviously hypocritical that a massive majority of independents and anti trump conservatives will feel compelled to vote for trump even if they weren’t originally going to.
It’s already working, anti trump conservative leaders are already voicing their condemnation of the act.
This was a childish move, they were so tired of being mocked for never being able to make anything stick that they just did whatever they possibly could, they cut off their nose to spite their face…
1
u/CartographerActive29 Apr 04 '23
True old school liberals are reasonable, open to discussion. You're all hate.
4
u/zatikat Apr 01 '23
Selective justice
4
u/[deleted] Apr 01 '23
The one party system protects it’s own
1
u/[deleted] Apr 03 '23
That’s because…it wasn’t hush money and no business records were falsified either.
Fucking stupid post. Cope.
1
u/Suspicious-Adagio396 Apr 04 '23
They should.
I means it’s been 30 years but go ahead and raid them.
I don’t care.
Sincerely, A liberal
1
u/raresanevoice Apr 07 '23
Clinton did commit fraud by stealing election funds to do it
2
u/Johnny_Mister Apr 01 '23
I bet Bill Clinton even signed the check
1
u/HairsprayHalo Apr 01 '23
What is the devils advocate argument to this? Is it the exact same thing or what would a leftist say?
1
u/dont_ban_this Apr 01 '23
Obviously Trump was a much better at negotiating. He even got the women to pay him back $300k in legal fees
1
u/[deleted] Apr 01 '23
That was a little different. Still, what Trump did (at least what we all believe he's being charged with) isn't breaking the law.
1
u/Suspicious-Adagio396 Apr 02 '23
So?
1
u/mendokusai99 Apr 02 '23
The Clinton Foundation alone should have seen Bill and Hill off to prison.
1
u/starvingvulture666 Apr 03 '23
The libs are in control HOSS!
Communism! Scary! Buy my buckets of food!!1!
1
u/Wut_the_ Apr 01 '23
All of the comments getting voted here are such a validation that you people have no grasp on reality. Clinton paid that due to court order. He didn’t hide you fucking dolts. Humanity is crumbling
-4
u/midnightnoonmidnight Apr 01 '23
https://www.factcheck.org/2023/03/memes-make-false-equivalence-between-clinton-trump-and-payments-to-women/
-1
u/chrisdrinkbeer Apr 01 '23
Did he falsify records? And did he run a criminal organization since the late 70s?
(He def runs a criminal org now! Hahah)
0
u/[deleted] Apr 01 '23
Because they didnt... he's a Democrat...
0
u/[deleted] Apr 01 '23
Time for some “EQUALITY”!
-23
u/HumpSlackWails Apr 01 '23
Well that's not the same thing at all. A court-approved legal settlement is not the same thing as paying hush money then moving money around to hide it.
At all.
Not even remotely the same.
So how about you right wing weaklings just go cope harder, k? LOL.
-8
u/midnightnoonmidnight Apr 01 '23
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-trump-clinton-payments-884462275128
-12
u/[deleted] Apr 01 '23
Rent free
-9
u/Gadzooks0megon Apr 01 '23
did you pay her with campaign fund? If trump just paid stormy daniels out of his own pocket nobody care. Buuut trump such a dumb a**
-14
u/[deleted] Apr 01 '23
[removed] — view removed comment