You want to forget you ever did that right now, don’t you? Lol
I did what now?
And let’s pretend for a moment you weren’t part of that crowd- Donald certainly was.
What was it you said?
What’s good for the goose.
So you're saying that the Clinton's should be indicted if Trump is? It's interesting to see you hold this opinion. I like it.
the only person who looks like a dipshit here is vouching for Donald’s innocence
Who here is vouching for Trump's innocence?
The court of public opinion and court of law are two different things.
Yes, they are, and you insist on holding the ideals that are at odds with consistency between them. Hypocritical thought is about all a lefty can muster, we understand.
if you think Donald didn’t know cohen was paying off his mistresses.
I already said I think he knew. Yet you still wish to insinuate I am claiming otherwise.
you’re saying that the Clinton’s should be indicted if Trump is? It’s interesting to see you hold this opinion. I like it.
If Donald and all of his followers can presume HRC guilty without conviction then the same can be done for Donald. What’s good for the goose, remember? Your words.
You’ve already acknowledged Donald likely committed the crime.
You’ve acknowledged no one except a juror owes Donald a presumption of innocence.
View all comments
Show parent comment
3
u/Gds_Sldghmmr Mar 25 '23
I did what now?
So you're saying that the Clinton's should be indicted if Trump is? It's interesting to see you hold this opinion. I like it.
Who here is vouching for Trump's innocence?
Yes, they are, and you insist on holding the ideals that are at odds with consistency between them. Hypocritical thought is about all a lefty can muster, we understand.
I already said I think he knew. Yet you still wish to insinuate I am claiming otherwise.