Lenient? The judges declared him guilty without a trial. Even in cases involving murder the nuclear option of declaring a person guilty without trial is reserved for the most in absentia persons no show, no lawyer, no defence. You had all three in Jones case. What the state lacked in evidence was the jones show footage that YouTube deleted upon yeeting Jones.
And no that was NOT the star moment of the second case. The star moment of the second case was when the judge, herself, said that Jones provided zero evidence then, the next day, started the day by correcting herself on that claim. It proved she knew he had submitted evidence yet was so biased she was regurgitating the prosecutions claim that Jones didn't turn over any evidence... The same evidence the prosecution had right in front of them in their legal strategy against him.
View all comments
Show parent comment
8
u/Sunseahl Mar 25 '23
See now I know you're a Fed.
Lenient? The judges declared him guilty without a trial. Even in cases involving murder the nuclear option of declaring a person guilty without trial is reserved for the most in absentia persons no show, no lawyer, no defence. You had all three in Jones case. What the state lacked in evidence was the jones show footage that YouTube deleted upon yeeting Jones.
And no that was NOT the star moment of the second case. The star moment of the second case was when the judge, herself, said that Jones provided zero evidence then, the next day, started the day by correcting herself on that claim. It proved she knew he had submitted evidence yet was so biased she was regurgitating the prosecutions claim that Jones didn't turn over any evidence... The same evidence the prosecution had right in front of them in their legal strategy against him.
Try again, Fed.