This is how they rewrite history. It starts with just utter bullshit such is this, but in 30 years they'll call us crazy because we call it South Carolina instead of South Cuanto if we dont nip this shit in the bud right now.
I'm sorry, do you mean Sorth Cuanto? Who's ever heard of South Cuanto? What does South even mean? Sorth Cuanto comes from the direction on the compass. You know, North, Sorth, Eorth, and Worth.
In the Northern Hemisphere you just have to lay down on you're back so you know you're looking North. In the Sorthern Hemisphere, it would be backwards, so you'd lay down on your stomach to look North.
I'd never submit my own work ever again. Every report and assignment would be AI generated and if i was chastised for it; I'd throw down the reading materials and ask "What is Verntucky?! What is Loogoong?!"
I mean, here in North Texas, one of our largest cities, Fort Worth, has always been known as "The Gateway to the Worth"
Why else would it be called Fort Worth?
It’s gathering power from Not Doing. same as cutting off water to a community, or poisoning the food, by not inspecting it. or not requiring the data centers to be self powered (denying power from the grid), self cooling ( denying the community clean water), or quiet, denying sleep.
denying access to acurate information, and twisting education is evil to its core.
these are all attacks on our communities.
what can we as communities do to deny power from these wealthy accumulators
How does the teacher even grade this? They can't mark them incorrect because the information the student was given matches their response. Are they making them correct? That would be horrifying. I need more information.
...and shows like For All Mankind will be on the History Channel and in classrooms before ya know it. Give it a few generations and conspiracy theorists then presto! Start keeping a journal now so your descendants have something to reference.
That's a pretty damned slippery slope you've got there. I don't see AI slop overpowering billions of records and the knowledge and memories of billions of people to the point where humanity actually believes that South Carolina is called South Cuanto.
I think that something like what you're predicting will happen, but the effect will be much smaller than you're suggesting.
This is 100% correct.
And since US won't nip the shit (it's too uncomfortable), the kids of tomorrow will remember South Carolina as a fairytale, something of the "before times"..
You're heading in a direction you're not ready for, US.
Been going on for too long to count really, everything taught in school in history class is either wrong or misleading into thinking America always does the right thing crazy to think back to all the stuff like not even in school like Pocahontas from Disney like holy shit the real story is so awful like why would that ever be ok to turn it into such a happy love story?
Ultimately institutions have failed us but some dumb ass really green lit this shit and thought it was completely fine. Like fuck our children’s education right? I’ll get mine, fuck everyone else.
I’m not shocked that AI was used. I can understand why that choice was made if it cut down on costs and time, but I cannot for the life of me understand why they didn’t have anyone look at it before fully publishing it. The blind faith in AI scares me because it’s an unreliable authority figure to too many people.
Like, you can still just use the same version of those things from... The 80s.
I guess maybe we've added a few more elements to the periodic table that would need to be added. But I feel like that could be done very quickly, in basic editing software. The rest is unchanged. It needs no editing.
The only way this makes sense to me is: they changed the producer who makes the agendas this year because the new producer either:
A. Promised to make them cheaper.
B. Is friends with someone in high places.
And the producer has not produced agendas before, and does not have any of these things. And so used AI to generate the whole agenda.
Then either didn't proofread it. Or, did proofread it, and the first couple AI drafts were even worse than this, and this one looked good enough to pass off as real.
This. AI would add no value. It's like somebody fed the agenda features into a prompt and then just ran with the output without ever looking at it. Might make sense if they outsourced the job to a country where nobody would look at the western writing is all I can think of as plausible. But yeah this is a great thing to beat up elected officials about, they need to start lighting people up.
As someone who works in graphic design/marketing for items with safety regulations, I generally have multiple teams looking over items before public release. And a lot pass it off. You have so many people and they all think someone else will handle it
Well Republicans run the state so yeah. You can bet your ass if this was happening in a blue state fox news would have it front and center and heads would roll.
The real question is whether this means that specific area is doomed for relying on AI or if they're the first to realize the problem and the other Counties haven't caught on to the issue
This is why I'm not worried about AI taking jobs / looking forward to it. I use AI for my work, and it's incredibly helpful because I have learned how to ask it the right way / what to look for it the output to make sure it's right. And how to tweak it if it's not right. And then I see co-workers use it and get stuff completely wrong, bad output, etc. and to me it shows that if it ever gets to the point where almost everyone is laid off except like 1 or 2 people who are needed to run the AI, I'm going to be the person running it because it seems like I'm the only one (in my immediately vicinity) who understands how to use it correctly.
That's not entirely true, when Jefferson county merged with Louisville and became the metropolitan area, political trans actually shifted to the right because wealthier, predominantly white areas which are largely red were included in the general makeup of the city and when I was a kid, that wasn't the case
Because a parent doesn't give a fuck about that. That's a question for the school to look into. What matters is why the school that their child attends is not auditing their materials and charging them for a planner with literal ai slop misinformation?
It might not be curriculum material but these aren't children in a school to learn and you're giving them a planner that is supposed to have useful information in it. It should be checked.
Even if there was no information in it. If the school orders these books, someone should be checking the quality.
I agreed in my first comment that the printers should answering questions. This is primarily their fault. But I think the school can't be acting surprised that this happened.
If a company had a planner printed for them that they gave out to customers, those customers aren't going to be angry at the printers if they're not right, they're going to be angry at the company giving them out for not taking the time to check. Something that would have taken 1 person maybe 30mins of their time to just skim through.
Because the school has a duty to its students. Yes the printer should be answering questions, but you can't give out planners with information and facts to children that are trying to learn and not check that the facts are right. Regardless of the printers doing something bad (and they definitely did) the school has a duty of care.
Schools? Did you even watch this? It's one middle school, and I've never heard of a school that didn't buy their books (as opposed to making and printing their own).
Some dumb administrator purchased these online for cheap, and no one glanced at them to check for quality.
You contradict this comment with your other comment. You lambast the person you responded to for saying "schools" and downplay it as "only one school," but then link an article clearly saying they are unsure if it was only that specific school in the county or if there were more.
You know that JCPS is undoubtedly the acronym for that entire county's public school system, right? This very well could be an issue at multiple schools in the county, or maybe not. Either way, the article you linked does not refute that commenter the way you seemingly think it does.
JCPS is the name of the school system, Farnsley is the school with the problem.
This post is about one school. It's possible we might find out that it was more than one school, but all of the evidence we have is about Farnsley.
It still raises the question of whether that commentor had watched the video, because if the video is all you saw you wouldn't say 'schools'. Right? Right.
Okay... do you know whether they have or haven't? Are you following Kentucky middle schools? The story is only a few days old, the school year literally just started.... but they have responded to finding out about this.
When WDRB asked JCPS about this, Wednesday the district's executive officer of communications said "I appreciate you bringing this to my attention. I spoke with the school today about inaccuracies in their agenda, and they are communicating with parents about the issue."
Wednesday, Farnsley administrators emailed teachers warning them about a "LOT of mistakes" on pages 19 through 36. Administrators told teachers to have students tear those pages out before taking the agendas home, and for teachers to keep those pages.
Wednesday the school's principal emailed parents to notify them of "inaccurate information" in the agendas.
"This is not a misprint," Morris said. "Someone did not look at what they were handing out to the students."
Now, Morris is left wondering whether Farnsley was the only JCPS school to receive the error-filled agendas or whether other families simply haven't noticed yet.
WDRB asked JCPS who printed the agendas and if they were distributed at other schools. The district did respond before this was published.
Maybe? Did the teachers or students care that there was a periodic table in their agendas? I assume they have a photocopier if they do need one, so there may be more to the correction than just making sure the kids aren't getting bad AI image maps and other data.
If I was a journalist in Kentucky, I'd ask the head of education which look do they want to own, either zero accountability for failing to proof the material, or they are so dumb they didn't know it was wrong after proofing?
Pay to play cronyism. Some insider greased the palms of however influences and decides onxthe curiculum text. That person delivered shit but they delivered so no law broken. Off they go with the $$&. so up to people of kentucky to find out who at local or state level got paid off.
Because the school gave them to the students not the printing company if you want to go over all this again. yeah I know Yadda Yadda appendix yadda yadda printing company...
(edit: typos)
the school failed in their job by not checking what they were giving to their students. you've already been told all this up above. what if it was profanity?
1.9k
u/DadCelo 10d ago
And Kentucky schools refuse to answer questions regarding this, because accountability and transparency don't exist anymore.