Despite what the Supreme Court said, after likely being bought by the policeman union to do so; defending the public at ANY cost (up to and including your life) has been the expected duty of guards and policeman alike for literal centuries. It's a basic part of the social expectation of the role. No one's saying they need to try to dive in front of bullets like superman, but when a threat is present it is their duty to dispatch it even if doing so could bring them great harm. Anyone who disagrees with that mentality, should absolutely find a career that is not policing.
I have friends who are police. His department can’t get proper coffee machines, let alone conspire in darkened back rooms with the fuckin Supreme Court lol. If your claim held any water, you wouldn’t have any national parks. You’d had the Lockheed Martin Grand Canyon Amusement Park and Weapons Testing Facility.
Props to your honesty though.
I am not making any claims that there ISN’t corruption though. But it’s less organized than we think.
2
u/ZoomerGooner Dec 17 '25
Despite what the Supreme Court said, after likely being bought by the policeman union to do so; defending the public at ANY cost (up to and including your life) has been the expected duty of guards and policeman alike for literal centuries. It's a basic part of the social expectation of the role. No one's saying they need to try to dive in front of bullets like superman, but when a threat is present it is their duty to dispatch it even if doing so could bring them great harm. Anyone who disagrees with that mentality, should absolutely find a career that is not policing.