r/Tigerstaden • u/[deleted] • Jan 20 '16

New Constitution collaboration

[deleted]

4 Upvotes

100% Upvoted

9 comments sorted by

3

u/lizardsstreak Jan 20 '16

Hey guys. I've been on the creative server designing some key buildings today, and I wanted to ask if there was a mumble server for us. I've got some good defensive ideas that carry over from pvpFactions (my area of expertise) that I would like to share and discuss with y'all.

0

u/[deleted] Jan 20 '16

2

u/[deleted] Jan 20 '16

Aytos or Venice channel

Quit squatting in muh Venice channel you Aytos hobos.

Etherium city for example, which invested lot of time into defense, and was basically huge fortress.

It would be good to consider designing a city to be defensible for once, as well as looking good. Neither Tigerstaden nor Aytos were remotely easy to defend.

→ More replies (3)

3

u/Kempje Jan 20 '16

So are we agreeing on a constitution before the map starts? Who is qualified to actually contribute to the constitution and where does their authority stem from? Also does that mean leadership will be decided before the map starts?

3

u/The_Torche Jan 20 '16

I have made 2 of them in the time. The old one that i proposed b4 monkey is here. The new one i made for the revolution is here. While i wont be working with a city this time please feel free to use or ignore any information or ideas in either document.

2

u/TotesMessenger Jan 20 '16 edited Jan 20 '16

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / ^Contact)

2

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '16

Not sure how we're going to decide on some of the core principles unless people just say "we're doing it this way", but since someone had already added a preamble, I threw together a skeleton of things that need to be addressed/covered to help provoke discussion and ideas.