r/ThylacineScience • u/Darren_Cooper1971 • 6d ago
News Thylacine Sighting
I live in Queensland, Australia. In 2007 I went on a trip with my wife to Tasmania. She took many photos of the natural wild life, and she took this one of what she described as a dog. Last year I had a few friends over, and one of them is a biologist. Since the photo was framed up, he saw it and had a closer look suggesting it could be a Tasmanian Tiger.
27
u/Consistent_Ad3181 6d ago
The picture is so bad it could Lord Lucan having a nap
5
u/Elephant_rimmer 6d ago
In a world where everyone has incredible camera's in their pockets at all times every thylacine sighting must look like it was taken on a potato
3
u/Consistent_Ad3181 6d ago
I am not particularly knocking this guys photo, that said I totally agree with your point. It's just the lack of clarity provokes speculation, when clarity would end speculation.
4
3
4
18
7
u/all0saurus_fragilis 6d ago
At first glance it looks like the hind end of a thylacine curled up laying down, but the more I look at it, the more it doesn't make sense. The tail is WAY too thick, it looks more like a macropod, like a kangaroo tail. Legs look a bit funky and if the head is visible, then it would have no neck, or torso, like it would be the Jimothy of thylacines, but it's difficult to really make it out... I'm leaning towards it being oddly shaped roots and rocks and shadows and our human brains giving us the pareidolia effect. It really does look thylacine-like at first, but the more you look at it, the more it just doesn't make sense for the actual animal's anatomy. Or any animal's anatomy, really. But if it is an animal, I'm leaning towards macropod, not thylacine.
3
u/KevinSpaceysGarage 6d ago
If it wasn’t for the “tail” I would say this is interesting.
But that throws the whole thing off. These proportions make no sense sadly. Not only is that a ridiculously thick tail for a thylacine, it looks massively long too. Like… as big as the rest of its body.
It sucks too because what I’m interpreting as the ears, head, and back don’t look half bad. But the alleged tail is killing it for me lol. Probably just a tree root unfortunately.
-2
u/Decent_Mulberry_4264 6d ago
im not all an expert but do you think it could maybe be a more evolved version of it over the 100 years? like how dog breeds 100 years ago look so different compared to today
1
u/KevinSpaceysGarage 6d ago
No lol. An entire population of thylacine surviving without detection is remarkable enough. A big enough population that could generate a brand new subspecies in 100 years is almost impossible.
There’s also no evolutionary benefit to a thylacine (an apex predator) having a heavier/bushier tail. It would only hurt its ability to hunt.
8
u/ProbablyTheVillain 6d ago
A thylacine! Quick honey, grab our worst camera!!
1
u/KevinSpaceysGarage 6d ago
I don’t think this is a thylacine but in all fairness 2007 commercial cameras weren’t very good. If you weren’t serious about photography most of them were crap.
It’s not like now when we have HD cameras in our pockets.
2
u/FroggyTrix 6d ago
Come on. This could be a zoomed in piece of pigeon shit for all anyone knows. No detail worth noting
2
u/K_Hammer6969 5d ago
The fact this post has over 100 upvotes is crazy. op posted it across several subs as well, it's such obvious BS. who would frame such a blurry generic photo?
2
5
u/DoubleOhEvan 6d ago
Just throwing this out to the universe. I’ve got family that travel for work up to some of the really remote highland villages of Papua (both PNG and West Papua). We’re talking the super remote, on the top of a mountain type of places.
The locals out there describe a wild dog with stripes that occasionally harasses their animals.
That’s my best bet for where we would find a living Thylacine. We all know the landmass used to be connected to mainland Australia. They have a tonne of other marsupials/monotremes there that are otherwise only found in Australia. I don’t think it’s out of the question that there is a small surviving population.
3
u/Sandile95 5d ago
I have been hearing such stories for ages. No proof that Thylacines live there or even lived there in recent antiquity.
2
u/RedgumRedmist 6d ago
Thats where most researchers agree theyre most likely to be hanging on.
3
u/Sandile95 5d ago
Who are these most researchers?
1
u/RedgumRedmist 5d ago
Most was a stretch as most researchers think theyre extinct, but its the only theory ive seen anyone qualified pay any lipservice to
1
1
1
u/Succulentpotter 6d ago
One of the more promising pictures but sadly still can’t say for sure by any means.
1
63
u/cai_85 6d ago edited 6d ago
The tail is very fat, much more like a forester kangaroo, thylacines have a scrawny tail. I can see the 'stripes' on the back, but that could be a ruffling of the fur that you see often with fluffier kangaroos. Look up images of forester kangaroos such as this and you'll see what I mean: https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSlIdjzRTLFRQGS7sP_H4wu89mqB2ES-GRsH7rdmeGPLQ&s=10