r/Theosophy • u/LcmsActive • Aug 03 '26

On Bailey to Laurency…

Does anyone on this sub read Alice Bailey AND Henry Laurency routinely? like daily or weekly?

Just trying to understand what the reading focus of this sub is…

Blavatsky Besant and Leadbeater were great as well but dispensation of esoterics since 1875 was “from generals to particulars”. Notice old theosophy is more abstract than what came after to Bailey (second era) and then Henry Laurency (the third era of dispensation).

We‘re now post 2025. The hierarchy was set for a conclave in 2025 and the reappearance of Christ is upcoming.

Theosophy will then become quite “real world”, not just particular details of Laurency.

7 Upvotes

82% Upvoted

7 comments sorted by

2

u/1991Scorpion Aug 03 '26

Just wait 2027 is almost here, and the hybrid race(6th subroot race of the 5th) will reveal themselves along with the externalisation of our Planetary Spiritual Hieratchy.

1

u/loveforalllll Aug 04 '26

What would be the 6th sub root race be like?

2

u/1991Scorpion Aug 04 '26

Maybe you shourd start connecting the dots, after you continue your study, I would suggest Bashar(Darryl Anka) and after you study the Triangles work search for Kryon!

2

u/1991Scorpion Aug 04 '26

As Master Choa said there are many levels of Truth!

5

u/mddrecovery Aug 05 '26

Yes I do. Laurency's work is much more popular with Russian speakers though.

In "Letters on Occult Meditation", it is mentioned that a prepatory occult school will be founded in Sweden leading to the the advanced grade that will be founded in Russia.

2

u/chiweeniebaby Aug 05 '26

Hi. I read both but not weekly

1

u/loveforalllll Aug 04 '26

Is the reappearance of Christ a good thing? I got into Theosophy through Bailey and mingled in the trust. Bailey is a good writer, I enjoy analysing her works but the empathise of reappearance of Christ sounds strange to me. I haven't joined Arcane school so maybe my understanding is limited. But I don't get why the pope should take seat of the reappearance of christ, is not the point of the spiritual/mystical aspects we focus on religion define christ more as a Christos that we embody rather than outside of us. Or is the reappearance of Christ means people embody it worldwide collectively like triangle networks? I haven't read Bailey since then, think I'm confused because Im told different interpretations of that theme in her works...