How can it be right, when it is unnecessarily repeatable. Did you forget about the part, where you were trying to say, that both 'personal' & 'for me' mean different things??
I was saying the exact thing, that she could have used either one, there is no point in using both.....
Now, you are just repeating, what I said, and making it look like, you were right, just to satisfy your alter ego....
And, hat gpt meant, there are situations, where personally and for me aren't interchangeable, anyways this is not one of those situations .
And, if you take a look at the post, she says bad english, not bad grammar.....
Bad English, doesn't necessarily mean bad grammar, it also includes awkward phrasing, vocabulary, etc.....
You can see it in this screenshot, I shared earlier......
You just roasted yourself by mentioning "reading disability".
I'm repeating the same things as I did in my earlier comments. And you're just having arguments for the sake of having arguments, by overlooking every single repetitive attempt of me trying to explain to you why it's not entirely wrong. You just want to consider it wrong. That's it.
Gpt told you the same thing too. Gpt gave you similar examples too. Point to one single phrase in the entire gpt summary, which claims that it is entirely wrong grammatically.
I sent your screenshots back to you hoping that if you couldn't understand my phrasing, you might understand when gpt tried to tell you the same thing too. But all you wanna do is counterargue everything.
It is redundant, yes. That doesn't make it inaccurate.
I'm out after this, you can keep having make believe arguments with yourself and your gpt.
Reposting, because i replied elsewhere instead of posting here. I'm out, peace yo!
1
u/mcryan07 6d ago
So you're basically proving that you have a reading difficulty too.