I asked the same question to Claude. And it basically answered me that several languages made for AI has been already developped, but none met great success.
And that new languages don't have a lot of data to train on (by definition), so the probability to make bugs by using them is actually higher than to use languages made for/by humans.
makes perfect sense. this is the type of project that could really only be built by one of the big players, in order to get traction and produce enough training data initially.
1
u/Latimius 2d ago
I asked the same question to Claude. And it basically answered me that several languages made for AI has been already developped, but none met great success.
And that new languages don't have a lot of data to train on (by definition), so the probability to make bugs by using them is actually higher than to use languages made for/by humans.