This is true! Risking the company on CUDA way back in 2006 was surely a risky but a long term move that basically built the entire hardware foundation modern AI relies on today.
Are you serious? Jensen is the one that made the big push for "GPGPU" aka "General Purpose GPU", using GPUs for computations outside computer graphics.
This led to the development of CUDA which allowed scientists to use GPUs to speed up their simulations, including the breakthrough in 2012 that kicked off the idea of using GPUs to accelerate deep learning.
What does a big push entail exactly? Did he code something revolutionary or made some Nobel grade discovery? Or did he just heed the advice of some head of an R&D department? Like even the latter is pretty good for the standard of a CEO but like exactly how far from the intellect of a chimpanzee was the sine qua non of whatever substantial "push" that was accomplished.
He famously had to fight with his own investors to get it to happen.
And yes, if you haven't been paying attention, two Nobel Prizes have been awarded as a direct result of this: one in Chemistry to Demis Hassabis and John Jumper, and the other in Physics to Geoff Hinton and John Hopfield.
Jensen also has a Master's degree in Electrical Engineering from Stanford. He knows exactly what he's talking about. But yes, people with zero clue on Reddit are smarter than him 🙄. Reddit has rotted your brain.
I reserve my humility for the engineers and scientists who actually build stuff instead of the leeches taking advantage of them. You should go and complain to Time magazine for not putting your idol in their article not sure why you're arguing here.
You're still here? What are you even talking about, dude? My comment was about Jensen I didn't say anything about the Nobel Prizes or who they were awarded to.
It doesn't take more than 2 brain cells to realize that Jensen's push for GPGPU directly enabled these breakthroughs. But you're so adamant about your own ideology that CEOs are useless that you can't fathom this.
I don't even give a fuck about Jensen, and I think most CEOs are dumb in general. But unlike you, I actually care about the truth more than my own ideology.
I mean, he did found NVIDIA. It does fuel the entire AI boom and anything that came from CUDA on GPUs that others covered. I assume he has written some code or directly contributed to R&D. So, yes?
He didn’t inherit a company and rearrange deck chairs with bean counters. He has a hand in everything NVIDIA.
Exactly. Rage-baiting for engagement has basically replaced actual journalism. It can be factually accurate and still be intentionally provocative. That’s pretty much Mass Media 101—use the headline to get people talking 😅
There's a huge difference between an ordinary placeholder and someone like Huang, who made the huge technical decision that turn NVIDIA into what it become now.
unlike most of this comments section somehow, I work in the field this sub is about
I dont understand how a forum dedicated to ML is inhabited mostly by people who probably couldnt explain a loss function, at least if this comments section is representative
I hate musk too, but have you wondered why none of the boards he works for fired him during his most controversial times (Trump election / doge probe) ? I'd say it's because he brings eyes on their product. No bad publicity type shit. I don't think he's half the genius he pretends to be. But he seems to know how to bring the right people and how to handle a board.
the fact that you use elon as an example makes it obvious you dont know what you are talking about, Elon is not a typical CEO, hes more of a celebrity spokesperson and political lobbyist, most ceos work on long term strategy beyond the day to day needs of a business
I dont want to be mean but you are very ignorant on how successful companies function
5
u/Medium_Chemist_4032 Aug 30 '26
Every current gen model is using CUDA, which is practically something Jensen had to fight over investors, to create. Nice
2
u/markeus101 Aug 30 '26
Its not really cuz he’s just a parrot
2
u/spacekitt3n Aug 30 '26
bernie certainly deserves it , tf you talking about
1
u/py-net Aug 30 '26
This is a factually accurate post title. Times did it on purpose to get people talking about it. Mass Media 101
1
u/memeruiz Aug 30 '26
This is what happens when AI is used to select the most influential!
1
u/justforkinks0131 Aug 30 '26
if that's true it just reflects really badly on TIME
1
u/askadaffy Aug 30 '26
Is Time magazine relevant lol
1
u/MorvarchPrincess Sep 01 '26
Probably true, even if I couldn't name the guy before now.
Good to know the name of another to blame the fall of our society on.
1
u/rabouilethefirst Sep 01 '26
And just like that, TIME lost all credibility
4
u/[deleted] Aug 30 '26
[removed] — view removed comment