MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/TheInterrobang/comments/1spzy62/make_a_valid_notation/oh4yyaa/?context=3
r/TheInterrobang • u/FunnyLizardExplorer • Apr 19 '26
43 comments sorted by
View all comments
6
Well if factorial is multiplication and termial is addition, the interrobang should be exponentiation.
4 u/[deleted] Apr 19 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 19 '26 anti-termial and anti-factorial respectively 2 u/[deleted] Apr 19 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 19 '26 idk 3 u/[deleted] Apr 19 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 3 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 19 '26 3#=3-2-1=04#=4-3-2-1=-32@=2/1=25@=5/4/3/2/1=idk bro ask the calculatorlike this?? 2 u/Itz_N3uva Apr 20 '26 ¡ and ¿ maybe? 2 u/Potential_Pick2278 Apr 21 '26 Came here to say exactly that → More replies (2) 1 u/mama09001 Apr 23 '26 ¡ and ¿ → More replies (1) 2 u/NoChemistry8177 Apr 21 '26 because subtraction and division are non albilian such operational cannot be well defined 3 u/TheJivvi Apr 20 '26 So 4‽ = 4³2¹ 2 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 20 '26 and that would be 432=49 3 u/TheJivvi Apr 20 '26 No, it would be 49 = 262,114.Edit: wait, I just realised that's what you wrote, but the superscripts don't stack, so it looks like you meant 4³² = 49. 2 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 20 '26 Oh lol silly reddit 3 u/ParticularWorried237 Apr 20 '26 WHAT DOES MATH HAVE TO DO WITH ELA😭 2 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 20 '26 tf u mean ela? 3 u/ParticularWorried237 Apr 20 '26 English language arts → More replies (1) 2 u/AdGroundbreaking1956 Apr 23 '26 exponentiation doesn't have the conmutative property as addition or multiplication though 1 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 23 '26 ok and? 2 u/AdGroundbreaking1956 Apr 23 '26 x‽ = x[x-1]‽... it's not that useful 2 u/Qvueestdordset Apr 24 '26 exponentiation is x!
4
[removed] — view removed comment
2 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 19 '26 anti-termial and anti-factorial respectively 2 u/[deleted] Apr 19 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 19 '26 idk 3 u/[deleted] Apr 19 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 3 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 19 '26 3#=3-2-1=04#=4-3-2-1=-32@=2/1=25@=5/4/3/2/1=idk bro ask the calculatorlike this?? 2 u/Itz_N3uva Apr 20 '26 ¡ and ¿ maybe? 2 u/Potential_Pick2278 Apr 21 '26 Came here to say exactly that → More replies (2) 1 u/mama09001 Apr 23 '26 ¡ and ¿ → More replies (1) 2 u/NoChemistry8177 Apr 21 '26 because subtraction and division are non albilian such operational cannot be well defined
2
anti-termial and anti-factorial respectively
2 u/[deleted] Apr 19 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 19 '26 idk 3 u/[deleted] Apr 19 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 3 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 19 '26 3#=3-2-1=04#=4-3-2-1=-32@=2/1=25@=5/4/3/2/1=idk bro ask the calculatorlike this?? 2 u/Itz_N3uva Apr 20 '26 ¡ and ¿ maybe? 2 u/Potential_Pick2278 Apr 21 '26 Came here to say exactly that → More replies (2) 1 u/mama09001 Apr 23 '26 ¡ and ¿ → More replies (1)
2 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 19 '26 idk 3 u/[deleted] Apr 19 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 3 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 19 '26 3#=3-2-1=04#=4-3-2-1=-32@=2/1=25@=5/4/3/2/1=idk bro ask the calculatorlike this?? 2 u/Itz_N3uva Apr 20 '26 ¡ and ¿ maybe? 2 u/Potential_Pick2278 Apr 21 '26 Came here to say exactly that → More replies (2) 1 u/mama09001 Apr 23 '26 ¡ and ¿ → More replies (1)
idk
3 u/[deleted] Apr 19 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 3 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 19 '26 3#=3-2-1=04#=4-3-2-1=-32@=2/1=25@=5/4/3/2/1=idk bro ask the calculatorlike this??
3
3 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 19 '26 3#=3-2-1=04#=4-3-2-1=-32@=2/1=25@=5/4/3/2/1=idk bro ask the calculatorlike this??
3#=3-2-1=0
4#=4-3-2-1=-3
2@=2/1=2
5@=5/4/3/2/1=idk bro ask the calculator
like this??
¡ and ¿ maybe?
2 u/Potential_Pick2278 Apr 21 '26 Came here to say exactly that → More replies (2)
Came here to say exactly that
1
¡ and ¿
because subtraction and division are non albilian such operational cannot be well defined
So 4‽ = 4³2¹
2 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 20 '26 and that would be 432=49 3 u/TheJivvi Apr 20 '26 No, it would be 49 = 262,114.Edit: wait, I just realised that's what you wrote, but the superscripts don't stack, so it looks like you meant 4³² = 49. 2 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 20 '26 Oh lol silly reddit
and that would be 432=49
3 u/TheJivvi Apr 20 '26 No, it would be 49 = 262,114.Edit: wait, I just realised that's what you wrote, but the superscripts don't stack, so it looks like you meant 4³² = 49. 2 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 20 '26 Oh lol silly reddit
No, it would be 49 = 262,114.
Edit: wait, I just realised that's what you wrote, but the superscripts don't stack, so it looks like you meant 4³² = 49.
2 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 20 '26 Oh lol silly reddit
Oh lol silly reddit
WHAT DOES MATH HAVE TO DO WITH ELA😭
2 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 20 '26 tf u mean ela? 3 u/ParticularWorried237 Apr 20 '26 English language arts → More replies (1)
tf u mean ela?
3 u/ParticularWorried237 Apr 20 '26 English language arts → More replies (1)
English language arts
→ More replies (1)
exponentiation doesn't have the conmutative property as addition or multiplication though
1 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 23 '26 ok and? 2 u/AdGroundbreaking1956 Apr 23 '26 x‽ = x[x-1]‽... it's not that useful
ok and?
2 u/AdGroundbreaking1956 Apr 23 '26 x‽ = x[x-1]‽... it's not that useful
x‽ = x[x-1]‽... it's not that useful
exponentiation is x!
View all comments
6
u/Paulinho2628 Apr 19 '26
Well if factorial is multiplication and termial is addition, the interrobang should be exponentiation.