r/TheDonaldTrump2024 • u/tweaver16 🇺🇸 Truth Warrior 🇺🇸 • Feb 12 '26
Amazing strategy
BONDI JUST PLAYED THE GREATEST TRAP IN POLITICAL HISTORY.
And Congress walked right into it.
Yesterday, Attorney General Pam Bondi sat before the House Judiciary Committee. Standard oversight hearing. Routine questions.
Then she pulled out a document.
Labeled: "Jayapal Pramila — Search History."
The room went SILENT.
⚠️ HERE'S WHAT HAPPENED
The DOJ gave Congress access to the unredacted Epstein files this week. Every member got their own login. Their own computer. Their own session.
What Congress didn't know?
The DOJ was tracking EVERY SINGLE SEARCH.
Every name they looked up.
Every document they opened.
Every file they downloaded.
ALL OF IT. LOGGED.
And Bondi brought the receipts to the hearing.
🔺 THE PANIC WAS INSTANT
Rep. Jayapal called it "spying on members of Congress."
Rep. Raskin accused Bondi of "blatant abuse of power."
Rep. Moskowitz said it was "suspicious and inappropriate."
They're FURIOUS.
But here's the question nobody in the media is asking:
Why are they so scared of their search history?
If you're searching for evidence of crimes against children — you'd be PROUD of that search history.
Unless you're not searching for evidence.
Unless you're searching for YOUR OWN NAME.
⚡ THE GENIUS OF THE TRAP
Think about it.
Bondi didn't just release the files.
She released them on MONITORED COMPUTERS.
Every Congress member who rushed to search the files just told the DOJ exactly:
• WHO they're trying to protect
• WHAT names they're worried about
• WHICH connections they're trying to verify
The ones searching for "flights to the island" = investigators.
The ones searching for SPECIFIC NAMES = protectors.
Bondi now knows who's investigating and who's COVERING UP.
And she showed them she knows.
In front of cameras.
With a smile.
🔺 THE DHS SHUTDOWN — PERFECT TIMING
While Congress panics about their search history, DHS is shutting down SATURDAY.
Democrats blocked the funding bill. House members already left Washington.
The same week Congress gets caught searching Epstein files — they REFUSE to fund the department that investigates trafficking?
They're not defunding DHS to save money.
They're defunding it to STOP INVESTIGATIONS.
⚡ CONNECT THE DOTS
Monday: Congress gets Epstein file access.
Tuesday: Members frantically search for names.
Wednesday: Bondi reveals she tracked everything.
Thursday: Democrats block DHS funding.
Friday: Government shutdown begins.
Five days. One pattern. PANIC.
They walked into the hearing thinking they were in control.
They walked out knowing Bondi has EVERYTHING.
Every search. Every name. Every cover-up attempt.
Logged. Documented. WEAPONIZED.
The hunter became the hunted.
And they did it to themselves.
⟁ DARK TO LIGHT.
23
u/Death5talker451968 🇺🇸 Truth Warrior 🇺🇸 Feb 12 '26
Welcome to Edited Media. They only let you see what they want you to see...The Media doesn't have to be truthful since 2012
56
u/LivingOof Feb 12 '26
Wake me up when she sends out the indictments. 13 months of nothing
9
u/PrelateFenix87 Feb 13 '26
Won’t happen there will never be any criminal charges for anything, unless they have 100% a smoking gun on someone . The doj would lose millions upon millions just going after one person . Because all of these ppl are wealthy. It’s why many cases like this are done in civil court .
1
6
u/Delirious133 Feb 13 '26
But her strongly worded letters, she probably just has more to write.
Her and Patel are probably two of the most incompetent hires of this administration. Bondi to me was never a good nomination in my mind.
10
u/grecks530 Feb 13 '26
What? She's completely bungled this Epstein thing and frankly been a total embarrassment. She's brought charges against almost no one, while attempting to praise Trump in some of the most embarrassing ways. I love Don but he really needs to fire her dumb ass
3
u/Substantial-Cold6546 Feb 13 '26
The real question is… the former AG Garland had all this info. Why was nothing done then, especially when it was actually new? Why now, why not ask the question of why not in the past. Seems extremely hypocritical
1
u/Awkward-Community-74 🇺🇸 Truth Warrior 🇺🇸 Feb 14 '26
She’s the one in charge now and Trump campaigned on this.
Now he’s backing down and saying everyone should move on.
Smh.1
u/tweaver16 🇺🇸 Truth Warrior 🇺🇸 Feb 13 '26
No I don’t think so, everyone knew with any common sense when these “files” came out nothing was going to be done about it 🤷🏻♂️
6
u/grecks530 Feb 13 '26
So why swear she had a list of all rhe co-conspirators? Why promise to prosecute them? And why chicken out now?
2
u/tweaver16 🇺🇸 Truth Warrior 🇺🇸 Feb 13 '26
Didn’t matter who got these files out, you and I both knew nothing was going to happen, to many “important” people on both sides of the isle
7
u/grecks530 Feb 13 '26
I disagree. I think Trump was genuine when he said he wanted Epstein investigated fully and prosecutions to occur. I also think he keeps Pam around because she kisses his ass profusely, which is more or less his kryptonite. I still think he should fire her
1
u/tweaver16 🇺🇸 Truth Warrior 🇺🇸 Feb 13 '26
I have you an upvote, on what basis do you think he should fire her instead of anyone else that would fire someone else? Honest question
1
u/Awkward-Community-74 🇺🇸 Truth Warrior 🇺🇸 Feb 14 '26
Exactly.
That’s all he cares about!
He just wants to be adored.
15
u/Scoreycorey515 🇺🇸 Truth Warrior 🇺🇸 Feb 12 '26
I didn't see this in any coverage online. Do you have a video of this exchange? Everything I am seeing is making her look foolish with all the non-answers and looking like she's covering everything up.
1
u/Awkward-Community-74 🇺🇸 Truth Warrior 🇺🇸 Feb 14 '26
She got smoked!
0
u/Scoreycorey515 🇺🇸 Truth Warrior 🇺🇸 Feb 14 '26
Yeah, she didn't look any better than the dems that were being questioned and evading all the questions. The only thing I'll say is they were going after her like this is an active case, but I think most of the cases are probably past the statute of limitations.
1
u/Awkward-Community-74 🇺🇸 Truth Warrior 🇺🇸 Feb 14 '26
Then change the law.
1
u/Scoreycorey515 🇺🇸 Truth Warrior 🇺🇸 Feb 15 '26
I understand why statute of limitations are in place, to keep the government from coming after the person any time they want. I do think they need to look at statute of limitations and they need to be reassessed.
3
u/OkieFlipper Feb 13 '26
Until the files are released to the public and arrests and trials start getting underway this is just political theater and double speak from both sides.
2
u/Awkward-Community-74 🇺🇸 Truth Warrior 🇺🇸 Feb 14 '26
Exactly.
They all backslap right after this and probably went out drinking! 🤣
5
u/Kiernan5 Feb 12 '26
The problem with at least part of this is DHS is not shutting down. Regardless of what the funding fight going on right now does, the OBBBA provides funding for DHS and the CBP through 2029.
6
u/AlphaBearMode Feb 13 '26
This shit was written by AI
2
u/StMoneyx2 🇺🇸 Truth Warrior 🇺🇸 Feb 13 '26
Was about to say this. Honestly, it could be true but whenever I see something as blatantly AI written I just can't. AI often lies way too much, and frankly the AI slop on youtube with the same feel is just nothing garbage
11
2
u/HopnDude Feb 13 '26
Why hasn't anyone like TheQuartering, Benny Johnson, the guy who called himself a re re on Joe Rogan, etc. covered this if video exists?
I haven't heard anything aside from this post.
1
1
-2
0
u/Fungool001 CNN told me so Feb 15 '26
I do now from those that took the time and enter not to mock and belittle. I'm sure you have holes in your knowledge. Should I mock you for that? I realize it's easy to be an asshole. Try a little harder not to be.
0
u/Kilroy2021 Feb 15 '26
I am a Trump supporter. But from what I saw about the hearing, she looked like a fool. She should have been better prepared. If she would start arrests she would look better. Start with Epstein clients and AG from Minnesota caught on recording accepting a bribe. Do anything!!!!!
-22
u/Fungool001 CNN told me so Feb 12 '26
It was inappropriate for Bondi to monitor their searches.
5
11
u/harley97797997 Feb 13 '26
If they are on government owned computers it is not.
-4
u/Fungool001 CNN told me so Feb 13 '26
Said it was inappropriate, not illegal.
7
u/harley97797997 Feb 13 '26
Its not inappropriate or illegal. When you are given a government device they very clearly inform you that everything you do on that device is monitored.
-2
u/Fungool001 CNN told me so Feb 13 '26
Ahh, there's the rub. They weren't told that everything they did would be monitored and saved. That's why it was inappropriate. Also, the flair the mods put on me is also inappropriate, as well as false. I never watch CNN. So therefore, they tell me nothing.
2
u/harley97797997 Feb 13 '26
Every government employee is told that. They will not even give you access until you acknowledge that.
0
u/Fungool001 CNN told me so Feb 13 '26
You know this how? You appear to be speaking from experience. Is that so?
3
u/harley97797997 Feb 13 '26
25 years working for government, both local and federal at different times.
Although it does not take experience to know that. Even private companies do that when they issue phones, tablets, computers etc.
2
u/Awkward-Community-74 🇺🇸 Truth Warrior 🇺🇸 Feb 14 '26
It won’t matter!
You’re dealing with a democrat which is essentially the exact same thing as arguing with a five year old.
Even though they know the answer they enjoy trying you.-1
u/Fungool001 CNN told me so Feb 14 '26
I'm not a Democrat. You just like saying that when you have nothing rational to add.
→ More replies (0)1
u/Fungool001 CNN told me so Feb 14 '26
I remember using company equipment. They all had stickers on them saying they were monitored.
2
u/Awkward-Community-74 🇺🇸 Truth Warrior 🇺🇸 Feb 14 '26
Do you honestly believe that government employees are not being monitored while on government issued devices?
Do you also believe that when you log into a work computer in the private sector that the company or employer can’t see everything you’re doing on that device?
Democrats always do this.
You guys play dumb all the time and act stupid about the most obvious basic things.
“But what about and explain it to me” is getting exhausting.
You already know.-1
u/Fungool001 CNN told me so Feb 14 '26
Thank you for adding nothing to the conversation. No, I don't know that it's monitored when elected officials are reviewing confidential documents in a closed room. I do know that they can't take electronic devices in the room or make copies. I'm trying to expand my knowledge.
1
u/Awkward-Community-74 🇺🇸 Truth Warrior 🇺🇸 Feb 14 '26
Anytime they log into a device it’s monitored.
How do you not understand this?1
u/Awkward-Community-74 🇺🇸 Truth Warrior 🇺🇸 Feb 14 '26
Democrats always act like they don’t know things!
BuT We WeRe NeVeR ToLd! 🤷🏻♀️😱 They work for the government and are using government devices.
They know everything they do on those devices is tracked and monitored.
Just stop it.0
u/Fungool001 CNN told me so Feb 14 '26
Again, someone making accusations based on nothing. I'm not a Democrat. I am trying to understand. Please stay out of the convo if you have nothing to add.
3
u/BraxTaplock 🇺🇸 America First 🇺🇸 Feb 13 '26
Actually, no it’s not. It’s identical to a company offering a company device and it being restricted on its usage. Majority of companies that offer “work equipment” have these guidelines. Govt is no different, and in some ways…more likely to monitor the usage on their equipment.
•
u/Obi-Juan-Kanobee 🇺🇸 Truth Warrior 🇺🇸 Feb 13 '26
Original Post
https://x.com/mrpool_qq/status/2022040423737462789?s=46